Sentences with phrase «too deep questions»
The only issue with too deep questions is that, if there is no member in the public with enough knowledge of the issues, it might go unanswered.
https://politics.stackexchange.com/ Not exact matches
Too many IT professionals think they are keeping score, but they aren't really asking deep enough questions or looking hard enough at what's going on in order to actually know the score.
Before getting too deep into the process of a huge business loan, ask yourself these three tough questions.
Woody poses basic religious or philosophical questions often ignored by the secularly oriented as «too deep» and skipped over by religionists engrossed in particular issues.
Yeah, I have lots of questions too, and know that while my attempts at answers will not be satisfactory to all (they don't fully satisfy me either), I hope that what I write can help move people toward a deeper conversation about these things and a way of viewing God that looks like Jesus on the cross.
They taught me too that our biggest questions, our deepest desires and fears and joys, often meet us in the quotidian challenges of marriage, parenting and home life — at the 3 a.m. feeding, in the tantrum at Costco, amidst piles of dirty laundry, at the community playground, in the bouquet of weeds left carefully on your pillow.
His presence with us will speak deep within them too and they will know we have something different about us and then may want to ask questions and seek for themselves.
Too bad Mediaite couldn't figure that part out, but perhaps it was because the question was just too deep to be quickly answered with a mindless soundbiToo bad Mediaite couldn't figure that part out, but perhaps it was because the question was just too deep to be quickly answered with a mindless soundbitoo deep to be quickly answered with a mindless soundbite.
Of course there are endless problems, questions, difficulties, concerning immortality where the mystery is too deep for our plummets.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Delve a bit deeper into my blog and you will see that since having Leo I haven't always loved motherhood, I struggled a lot when Leo was 2 and went through a biting phase and throwing serious toddler tantrums, I have often questioned if I'm doing it all wrong and have felt the unwelcome effects of «mum guilt» on an all too regular basis.
It isn't just self - interest which is plunging Labour into civil war; there's a deep philosophical division about both the means and the ends too (as well as questions of individual competence).
Your other question was not too deep (relates to a very complicated issue), it was too broad (asks a lot of issues in one question).
I think that this question is really too broad and opinion based to effectively answer on Stack Exchange (see my comment), so I will just say in passing that there are deep cultural, ideological, religious and political differences between the two that lead to these extreme actions
However, in a separate question, 59 per cent agree with the suggestion that the cuts are «too drastic and too deep.»
He has pushed the hypothesis of morphic resonance for 20 years and claims, rather bitingly, that his motivation is a too - rare reverence for science as a vehicle for addressing deep, difficult questions.
«BoJack Horseman» gets off to a superb start in Season 3, pushing plot quickly in order to dig into the deep emotional moments — all while asking a question too many people (and animals) readily dismiss.
When the questions Kevin and Madeline fire at each other start to hit too close to home, the actors succeed at taking their performances to a deeper, more real place without getting maudlin, and without the movie getting ponderous.
The Digital folks have done well for themselves out of this whole affair, as the three books in question (two of which were deep backlist) have gotten a lot of attention; advertising them as too hot for digital is a pretty shrewd move.
by Kristen Eckstein Before we get too deep into answering this question, know upfront this is like asking a mother of three which child is her favorite.
The simple answer to that question is that lenders have to lend if they are to make any profit at all, but there is a deeper reason too.
A question like that is the perfect chance to explain San Francisco Renters Insurance to them without dragging them too deep into the specifics.
It's not a truly profound story, though, as there were moments where the game didn't delve as deeply into the moral implications of Hollow Children as it could, or even should, have, yet the final hour of this seven hour single - player campaign had me on the edge of the seat, eagerly trying to anticipate what was coming next Sure, it's not going to have you questioning your moral values or beliefs too much, but by shooter standards this is some deep stuff, making Binary Domain's story its greatest asset and worthy of your time.
17 QUESTIONS with Guy Overfelt «I'm a card - carrying member of the In Too Deep Club.
I may have questions about the focus on big donors — too often at the expense of deeper analysis — in the opening exhibitions at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, which opens to the public May 14.
But as an explanation of what they're up to: «ICES 1999 Annual Science Conference CM 1999 / L: 19 Nordic Seas Exchanges The Deep Overflow through the Faroe Bank Channel» In this paper he doesn't make any firm commitment to trends, but notes «a slight indication of a decreasing trend in ISOW transport»; «as yet the ADCP measurements in the Faroe Bank Channel are of too short duration to allow any conclusions on this important question.»
A question like that is the perfect chance to explain San Francisco Renters Insurance to them without dragging them too deep into the specifics.
When a life insurance agent gives you a quote that you know sounds a little too good, do you question it or set yourself up for disappointment by choosing to believe something that, deep down, you really know -LSB-...]
Marvin Minsky questioned the many algorithms used by AI researchers, like deep neural networks to mimic strong AI — which he felt are too opaque and can be easily fooled.
This one, too, could be about questions, but digging deeper into the individual instances of «why» in viral headlines revealed that there's more here: «Why» promises an explanation.
And if couples get too deep into wedding season without focusing on the right questions, they may have a wonderful ceremony that (sadly) ends up being the highlight of the marriage.