Sentences with phrase «too little debate»

There is far too little debate about alternative responses to this crisis.

Not exact matches

While the debate around the fiduciary rule has focused on fees and conflicts of interest, too little has been said about the diligence required.

Atheists, well, most of»em spend a little too much time debating something that doesn't mean a bloody thing.

Without going into details here, there are too many assumptions in dating techniques used by evolutionists, but don't take my word for it... just do a little unbiased research on «flaws in dating techniques» and go through these sites just to get you started for the major flaws in evolution that even evolutionists can not debate.

Now at some time in the eternal security debate, after all this talk about grace, someone says something like, «I think you're taking this grace thing a little bit too far.

This Arsene Wenger debate is becoming all too familiar and there is very little left unspoken about his situation, besides the actual fact as to whether he is leaving or not.

It is too important for its future to be determined in a back room deal which would then be bounced on MPs with precious little scope for proper debate let alone public consultation.

As the debate unfolded the questions consisted of too much historical and philosophical minutia seemingly tailor - made to make Libertarians seem hopelessly eccentric to a national audience, far too little dealing with the news and concerns of the 2016 election.

Then, too, the wannabes have little to debate since they agree on just about everything from immigration to affordable housing.

Since the Rosetta spacecraft's arrival last August (SN: 9/6/14, p. 8), researchers have debated whether 67P was a comet that lost some weight around its waistline or two comets that got a little too...

, researchers have debated whether 67P is a comet that lost some weight around its waistline or two comets that got a little too attached to one another.

u «Since the Rosetta spacecraft's arrival last August [2014], researchers have debated whether 67P is a comet that lost some weight around its waistline or two comets that got a little too attached to one another.

Ok firstly, I'm not here to debate on a bodybuilders level of protein consumption and what is too much or too little to become Mr. Olympia.

I'm a a tad late to the party (debate) on the candles: all wicks n waxes!!!! The truth is there is always going to be a «they said, they said» issue... All waxes have or contain naturally occurring, usually mild toxins, burning anything will pollute your environment - I am a bit of a hippie & have been making candles (I prefer soy, beeswax & blending the two) the pure essential natural fragrances I use can be extremely harmful when incorrectly used (too much) or even the natural soaps I have started making the wrong amounts of fragrance & «natural» preservatives used can cause serious skin & health issues... I use all natural cleaning products, I will start to make my own soon (again a little more research & I'm good to go) for example Spagnham moss is a brilliant disinfectant 100 % natural) and yet so strong even slightly inhaled can cause breathing issues!!!

I honestly debated whether or not I was going to post this outfit because well, it just felt a little too vulnerable.

I'm debating adding a little «snow» to the stars too, or giving them a coat of metallic silver paint.

At first I debated putting it with a green vegan leather jacket but it ended up being too much color and a little too out - there for my style.

Greg I see your point, the fact that the republican debates spend too much time talking about gen 3 pokemon rather than gens 5 and 6 is a little unsettling.

Instead of quickly releasing the drone's missiles and taking out the terrorists, the fate of that one little girl, whom they can see all too clearly, becomes a sticking point as issues of ethics, propaganda, and legalities are debated among people whose world views that don't necessarily mesh with one another.

Second, these heated debates have led school - choice proponents to pay too little heed to crucial questions of market design and implementation — especially the extent to which reforms have, or have not, created a real market dynamic in education.

Imagine someone beginning a debate by saying, «I am arguing that kids have too much [substitute «too little» here for the pro-homework side] homework but I must admit that I have no idea how much they currently have.»

Despite debates in the media over whether American students are academically overburdened, 85 percent of parents believe their children are doing the «right amount» or «too little» homework, and three - quarters of students say they have enough time to complete their assignments, according to a survey released this week.

The bottom line is that «developmentally inappropriate» is too often used as a shut - down phrase, one that adds little to debate or understanding.

Ongoing public debate about whether the United States, specific states, and local communities spend too much or too little on education and whether those dollars are spent correctly can be traced through the case law history associated with various school finance law suits.

But the issues raised remain important ones which receive too little thought and open debate, a point also made in this posting on the Brave New World blog.

Then they debated and deliberated and decided just one more and therefore got twins — Rigel and Orion — who were no doubt going to voice hostility about their names when they became older than four, especially when Rigel found out he was named after the constellation's toe, but who for the moment were too little and too loud to care.

We can debate all day on whether or not that price is too high, but what really has people up in arms is the little note under the picture of the XOOM that reads «To activative WiFi functionality on this device, a minimum of 1 month data subscription is required.»

It's too easy on a messageboard to be distracted by debates and arguments that have little value, better to set the agenda and as you say invite criticism of your investment case.

Doing too little may expose Australia to ongoing changes elsewhere, yet this strategic repositioning to the rest of the world gains only marginal interest in the public and political debate.

I might add that Captain Kangaroo turns up when things get a little too partisan and there is less interest in science than schoolgirl debating points.

The title Climate change debate: «calm, civilised, informative» on Andrew Neal's blog, while snappy and appropriate to the discussion that took place, is also a little too sickly sweet.

For too long, the national and international climate debate has been little more than that: a debate.

Others, such as Confucius, had talked about ideal populations, but it was Malthus» notion of too many humans for too little food that galvanized the modern debate.

Thanks to the lobbying work of the coal and oil companies, and the vast army of thinktanks, PR consultants and astroturfers they have sponsored, thanks too to the domination of the airwaves by loony right shock jocks, the debate over issues like this has become so mad that any progress at all is little short of a miracle.

The topic of legal education gets, in my view, too little attention, so I'm always pleased when leading figures in the field stimulate the debate.

I too have a stairway that I am debating and saving up for... And I tell you we have walked a lot of stairs that don't have carpet and where they are pretty - they are so slippery and dangerous for little feet!!