Sentences with phrase «too much argument»

I have not been making any money this year, but I have ribbon from last year's and I'm sure I can add Bleach to the list withou too much argument from my non-creative husband.

Not exact matches

But the glut of digital communication, from Facebook romances to arguments that take place solely over text, has made Turkle worried that people have come to expect too much from their devices.

This could actually be arguments 1 through 10, but its many nuances are being boiled down to the essence of «there's just too much of it, and most of that is because all E.U. citizens have the right to come and work here.»

On the other side of this argument are those who believe that the massive amount of debt is too great for central bankers to overcome, no matter how much money they can create.

But that argument proves too much.

So it's not only longer than the bonds we were issuing then but the argument, «well, it's not really that much longer than this bond is,» is perhaps that extrapolation that makes me a little bit nervous, that there is too much complacency.

But I think too much water has passed under that bridge for that argument to be effective.»

I'm not a Libertarian but even I understand the arguments and complaints about giving too much power to a government, no matter what government that may be.

If We are to «Go G - dless» as the graphic suggests just because a few Fools abuse religion, then by the same logic We should also abstain from alcohol just because a few Fools drive drunk, abstain from communicating just because a few Fools put forth unsound argument, and abstain from eating just because a few Fools eat too much.

One might say that the foregoing argument hinges too much on the assumption of a traditional Last Judgment.

It's too much to reiterate in the limited space we have left, so I urge you to pick up God and the Gay Christian for the full argument.

Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than repeat old arguments.

But Duffy never wanders too far from this one persistent argument» that much of the vitality and resiliency of Catholicism is found in its rituals and worship, in lay devotions and Marian piety, in veneration of the Church's blesseds and saints, in acts of communal discipline and obedience that bind the faithful together as a living organism.

Readers» comments on the piece included much criticism, too (although there was plenty of support for Helminiak's argument).

How would any country in the mid east react if I and 30 Christians hoped in planes and took out 3000 people... (I am not Christian and would likely not ride in a plane with that many neurotic people, but for arguments sake... personally I think religion is the fastest road to hell, but that's another debate)... the answer is simple... Jihad... how do I make such a simple 1 word answer... Ayatollah in Iran... he has a Jihad panic button... Osama Bin Laden... he has one too... that dude in Iran that no one knows or cares how to pronounce... has 2... one for the world and one for Israel... and pretty much anyone with keys to a mosque.

But this argument concedes far too much in the way of black dignity for the sake of being able to demand sympathy.

Nevertheless, I pursued a running argument with Barkun: he was wasting too much intellectual energy on the lunatic fringe.

Some may propose, however, that a convincing argument for communicative rights achieves too much because it contradicts the assertion that moral theory requires such a telos.

But in the eyes of many middle - of - the - roaders, both sets of arguments have lost plausibility by virtue of being too much disputed.

I love how arguments are conveniently directed towards «our sin» and «the universes answers would be too much for our feeble brains» And «it's not that h doesn't love us, we bring this upon ourselves.»

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

We may reconstruct the adjectives and phrases used to describe him both at the cocktail parties of the Corinthian elite (if the latter was aware of him at all) and in the pubs where his petit - bourgeois clientele would gather: «fundamentalist,» «simplistic,» «compulsive - neurotic,» «asking too much of sensible people,» «never listening to the other side of an argument,» «perhaps a little crazy» — in sum, some thing of a disagreeable fanatic.

Altizer's literal interpretation of the Incarnation in this third argument seems ultimately even more self - destructive than Origen's well - intentioned but much too literal interpretation of Christ's words to his disciples about those who have courage to make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven (Matt.

The problem with this argument is that it proves too much rather than too little.

I've heard the arguments of some preachers too: that some debt is a sin but other sources of debt are not, or, as you say, «too much» debt is a sin.

As we shared our experiences, she agreed with all my well - rehearsed reasons for not giving too easily, but then she said, «You know, if I could do those years over again, I wouldn't worry so much about all those arguments.

Furthermore, the Catholic emphasis on the role of natural law does nothing to dispel the idea that too much use of scripture in moral argument can be inappropriate or impolitic because it can make universal truths seem to be based only upon specific revelation.

I posted this a week ago to my personal blog and intended to cross-post it here without too much delay, but I've just realized that I never got around to it.There's a particularly bad argument against those who accept the biblical prohibitions against same - sex sexual acts, and I think I've....

Once or twice a month I'd bring up the possibility of adopting a puppy, and he would say it would be too much work, that we should wait until we have a house with a yard etc., and then I would respond with the ever - convincing argument of «but I waaaaaant one!»

The most common complaint I hear about this diet is that «it costs too much to eat healthy»... well, I have an argument to that!

Supporters for Jack Morris usually don't appeal too much to the statistical argument, other than the bloated win - loss record.

There is an argument that others could also be included in this list, but whether City's incoming boss is ready to rip up the entire manual and start all over again is debatable as too much change and losing fundamental players could be a big risk.

When adversaries stick it to you from outside the club, always trying to cause a stir within and among us and we have so called fans agreeing with these failed pundits who prolly do nt even have a voice in their own households, we like illegitimate children back up their unsincere arguments, hell Piers Morgan does it from a place of genuine concern, the AKBs and AOBs too, Fatboy gooner and NY gunner on here even and we are happy to have them but when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame again.

The interviewer asked the predictable question about «how good is Sanchez blah blah» and Wenger basically said he is so talented that he often tried to do too much by himself — the individual v the team argument.

Of course like anyone the 1st choice would be Aubameyang, but can we really pull it off, probably too much money asked (but we have arguments).

The argument of spending too much will put the club in debt and in a bad position is rubbish, and it is mentioned far too many times to scare fans.

I don't have too much of an argument.

ZILLER: I'm sympathetic to any argument that reminds us Scott Skiles and Jim Boylan having been running the Bucks» rotation, but «Henson has too much talent not to be playing 30 minutes a night» is something you could say about 50 other guys collecting DNPs.

Getting tired of this argument Too easy for players to hide behind Wenger, if he's guilty of anything it's protecting them too mToo easy for players to hide behind Wenger, if he's guilty of anything it's protecting them too mtoo much

Well, this same argument can be made against Benz and true, he's not as indispensable as some say he is and CR will definitely not suffer too much in his absence if we bought another striker but we mustn't reduce his work to nothingness and rubbish him at the slightest chance we get.

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

They may be a bit more too much towards the critical bracket for many but I have always thought you mostly back your comment with an argument that seems considered.

I wasted far too much time wading through testimonials and arguments on why this method is best.

I think the top commenter was much too kind to Elicia with the «you're young and don't know» argument.

Need to remember though that they are driven solely by incentives and pressures at that age, so don't expect too much by way of reasoned argument at the family meeting!

If you want to ignore the facts and live in blaming - the - victim - ignorant - bliss then that's fine, but your argument smells a bit too much like «she shouldn't have been wearing that short skirt.»

The foundation of the life chances argument is that who your parents are and where you are born does far too much to determine opportunities and outcomes, and that politics needs to break that down.

A second question is what's the best way for countries to work down their debt - to - GDP ratios, and the argument is that focusing too much on cutting the numerator is self - defeating and countries should instead prioritize growing the denominator, i.e. implementing long - term structural reforms to spur growth, thereby growing their way out of their debts.

And, while senior Labour politicians are busily apologising for spending too much in the past, the Oxford economist, Simon Wren - Lewis, has shown that the argument that the last Labour government seriously mismanaged the nation's finances is a myth.

State senators in favor of this bill made a three - pronged argument: property taxes have become too burdensome for middle - class homeowners; the property tax caps for municipalities outside the city have been — according to Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan — «a tremendous success,» as well as a job creator; and that the city had benefitted so much from uncapped property tax collections that the mayor shouldn't be surprised about the governor's proposal to shift Medicaid cost to the city.