Sentences with phrase «too much benefit»

Well, it turns out I gave Gelbspan too much benefit of the doubt there..........

It's also possible to enroll the Chase card into Southwest's Dining Rewards, and get additional bonuses that way, although since I don't live in an area where there's many restaurants involved in Dining Rewards, I don't get too much benefit out of that at all.

I can consume in small doses (2 TB or so per week) without consequence, but in that small amount, I don't believe too much benefit can be reaped, if any at all.

Not exact matches

Yet despite the trendiness and numerous health benefits of getting out of the office from time to time, most employees still spend way too much time planted in front of their computers.

Third - party contracting firm benefits aren't only less generous, but the exorbitant Silicon Valley housing prices and rents make life as a contractor so difficult workers from contract companies often can't afford to elect a benefits package, because doing so will take too much out of their paycheck.

It's still too early to assess just how much a more restrictive U.S. immigration policy will hurt U.S. tech companies or benefit tech economies elsewhere, says Michael Tippett, cofounder of True North, a firm that specializes in helping tech companies set up offices in Canada.

Whether scheduling takes too much time, plugins don't talk to each other, or there is another area that would surely benefit from automation, invest in the right tools.

They're friends with your ideal customer, or they're similar in some way, or they see how much your ideal person benefits from what you offer, so they want it too.

Additionally, the Tax Policy Center has argued that many businesses with too little income or are losing money don't benefit from bonus depreciation, especially in times of economic recovery, and that it may not have much of an impact on long - term investment.

Most business can benefit and achieve a remote workforce without too much implementation woes, just think «do your staff come to work just to sit on the computer and access the business data store?»

It's a deferment of your benefits designed to keep you from spending too much too soon.

If your benefits have been reduced due to earning too much prior to reaching your FRA, you will get these benefits back at your FRA when your monthly Social Security check will be increased to account for benefits withheld earlier due to excess earnings.3

This power shift is often a result of voter frustration with one party's propensity to do «too much» or «too little» to benefit its political agenda.

Millions of Americans own stock in their employer through various employee stock ownership plans and 401 (k) plans.1 While there can be discounted prices and specific tax benefits to buying employer stock, many investors hold way too much of it.

On more than one occasion, President Barack Obama has proposed capping the tax benefit, on the grounds that too much of the $ 30 billion or so a year in foregone federal taxes ends up in wealthy investors» pockets.

Investors feel encouraged to invest in economies with stable interest rate policies and it is to Canada's benefit not to change interest rates too much or too often.

More than that may reduce the diversification benefits, with too much of your portfolio's risk then coming from commodities alone.

You think Jesus would stand with the rich while they take benefits away from the poor, all the while moaning about what parasites the poor are, and that the rich pay too much as it is?

While we may be smart enough to benefit from the text, maybe it is too much to assume that it doesn't require engaging that intelleigence with some sacrifice over a period of time.

So, while it may be problematic to make too much of the distinction between Scripture and Christ, I think that evangelicalism will benefit from a reminder that our faith centers around the living person of Jesus Christ — the World Made Flesh — not on the sacred texts that point to him.

My basis for flatly opposing reproductive and research cloning is that it offers too little human benefit at the cost of too much likely harm, not that it is an offense against human dignity.

And while each chapter did indeed contain some helpful background information on each of these subjects, such information was too scattered and disorganized to be of much benefit to the reader.

Nevertheless, some people just want to give and do not care too much about receiving the extra benefits of membership.

Rich people and huge corporations have too much political power and manage to get laws passed that benefit them.

I mean, even though I personally have no direct need for meal plans, I bet there are A LOT of people out there who would greatly benefit from a little help, and I would surely appreciate some extra recipe inspiration too (there's no such thing as too much recipe inspo, right?

Moreover, it's beneficial too, here are its benefits https://farmerunclefruits.wordpress.com/2017/09/04/dragon-fruit/ thank you so much for sharing this salad recipe with us i am so gonna try it.

We examine the papaya fruit, including a look at some of the potential health benefits, how it is used, and the potential risks of consuming too much.

There are still more health benefits... but too much for me to list here.

It just makes so much sense to me that the spontaneous natural proliferation of microbes that create lacto fermentation happens simply by adding water and some salt to produce, and those same bacteria that preserve and increase the nutrition of the food make our bodies benefit in a multitude of ways too!

Please remember that gluten - free bread dough is stickier and much more fragile than its conventional counterparts, so don't add too little water in an effort to create dough that can be rolled, for example, without benefit of plastic wrap.

It pretty much cancels out any benefit you get from a protein powder when you see a bunch of added sugar (Shakeology Protein Powder is guilty of this too).

It makes pretty much any sandwich low carb and gluten free too, two nice side benefits.

However Ms Holgate said Australia Post, which returned to a $ 95 million profit this year after a $ 222 million loss in 2015, don't want to spend too much on infrastructure for Amazon's benefit and be left with legacy infrastructure.

Almost all of my recipes fit in my weight loss program and one of the benefits of the program is there's no need to count calories or take too much time with nutrition labels.

These homemade vegan maple marshmallows are easy to make and thanks to my burning myself, setting my agar agar before it went in to the batter and using too much lemon (trust me, just use the 1/2 teaspoon) you benefit from the wisdom of my many, many mistakes.

Although dark chocolate can benefit from a little sweetness, too much will muddy your palate.

Cork Dork is an informative and riveting read that doesn't take itself too seriously — a much needed dose of reality the wine world could benefit from.

Most people reach for one because the red they've pulled is too young and needs some softening via aeration, but you'd be surprised how much even a simple white will benefit from a splash.

After showing a significant upturn in pace at the season opener, some teams are concerned that Haas may be benefitting a bit too much from its partnership with Ferrari

Basically he SHOULD be sold for the teams benefit, but whether he will be is another matter and I'm not going to complain too much if he stays cos I love the guy.

The benefits for both sides made too much sense.

Alexis Benefits - has it all n supports defense Demerits - except he tends to hold the ball that bit too much.

We'll give Smith the benefit of the doubt and suggest that he was getting ready to get back on defense as the shot clock was winding down, but that might be giving him too much credit.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

While this injury to Lucas may not affect the manager's plans too much for this weekend's Premier League trip to Sunderland, it might do for the weeks to come, so one player who could benefit from this is our big French centre forward Olivier Giroud, as he is now the only real alternative to the Chilean star Alexis Sanchez.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

Ozil needs to be played more centrally if we hope to benefit from his creativity with the ball and Welbeck's first touch is far too sloppy to be played along side Lacazette... we need to find a formation which allows more service to those making runs from the middle of the pitch... Lacazette can not play so much with his back to goal or we're simply playing the same unsuccessful offensive scheme we played with Giroud, who is much better in that type of role... I can only hope we keep Sanchez and purchase a true defensive midfielder then switch to a 4 -4-1-1, which allows us to have Ozil play more centrally with Sead and Sanchez on the left side and Ox and Bellerin on the right, which would stretch defences so much that we could overwhelm most opponents with both runs in behind and overlapping runs out wide

At the same time, no one is complaining about the 6th or 7th team from the ACC or Big 12 - its the 11th and 9th place teams getting too much of a benefit of the doubt.

Huddersfield are without Nahki Wells, Jonathan Hogg, Martin Cranie and Jon Stankovic KEY FACT: Huddersfield's last top - flight match was in April 1972 and was also away at Crystal Palace MATCH ODDS: Palace 4/5 Draw 12/5 Huddersfield 15/4 ANDY SAYS: Be an interesting one this, and I think my old club might get held here — 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: Such a tough call, how do Palace play under De Boer, I will give them the benefit of the doubt — 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Be a close game this one, but I fully expect Palace just to have too much — 2 - 1 LADBROKES PICK: Crystal Palace and under 2.5 goals @ 21/10 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Christian Benteke is still a class performer and for us could still be a very good addition to your portfolio

I wonder, too, what the long term benefits are for children whose mothers did make that sacrifice (when able) and how it impacts society on a much grander scale than cost of formula vs. cost of breastfeeding.