Sentences with phrase «too much regarding»

We haven't seen too much regarding the phone, but this week a new set of images has given us our best look yet.

However, I do not worry too much regarding the size of portfolio: some will start with $ 5K, others with $ 5M or $ 50, whats really important is passive income and I keep track of it and regularly post them including my purchases, so, you can follow that.

I'm 54 yr old female... I take 2 TBSP of ground organic flax each day... hope it's not TOO much regarding the cadmium... so easy to include in Greek yogurt, oatmeal, or on a green salad, etc..

All in rapid real time, while a third cast of thousands seeks emphatic endorsement of interpretations that add or subtract from the global warming meme without too much regard for the toils of the other groups.

Not exact matches

As a small country, Denmark rates much better than most developed nations in this regard, but it too is seeing an erosion in that trust, Nørretranders says.

Michael Jordan, a machine learning expert and computer science professor at University of California, Berkeley, said there is «way too much hype» regarding the capabilities of so - called chat bots.

However, those no - action letters might not actually mean too much, at least in regards to the JOBS Act and Title III, despite what you may have heard.

If you're depending on your portfolio to throw off a certain amount of cash and you take too much risk by choosing investments that are too volatile, you could come up short regarding your living expenses and be forced to accelerate withdrawals, increasing the chances that you'll run out of money or shortchange your estate.

«But in regards to our industry, I don't see Trump pushing for too much regulation, given his business background,» Cody adds.

I don't focus too much on the stock price or book gains / losses regarding my investments, but it is still interesting to see how some short term market expectations can lead to quite a nice entry price.

Remember, you always have Thomas Aquinas too — regarding reason and revelation, this man and his writings are a truly a divine gift (I say this not knowing much of divine gifts).

He will have no regard to your welfare, nor be at all careful lest you should suffer too much in any other sense in only that you shall not suffer beyond what strict justice requires.»

Inspired by his own speculations, Lemert even suggests that «had America had (or taken) time, it might have called Stalin's bluff without exciting too much its trigger - happy self - regard.»

(Not that power isn't an issue too, I'm just wondering how much damage is done to young men's psyches regarding their sexuality.)

Jeremiah 18:21, 23) A notable amount of praying in the Old Testament is thus cursing, and lest Christians should assume too much credit in this regard, a similar abuse of prayer, all the more inexcusable because sinning against light, stands in the New Testament — «How long, O Master, the holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?»

Regarding the relationship between love and power, Hartshorne began by stating that «the real trouble is not in attributing too much power to God, but in an oversimple or too mechanical conception of the nature of power in general.»

I'm saying you probably shouldn't put too much weight on testimonies that differ on important points regarding the same events.

Hartshorne attributes this consistent violation of the principle of dual transcendence to the fact that classical theism has placed too much faith in Greek philosophy, and to a Western prejudice according to which absolute independence along with the power to the cause of events is regarded as a superior attribute while relativity and the capacity to be an effect is mistakenly regarded as an inferior attribute.»

Yet a proposition regarded simply in terms of its logical subjects admits too much vagueness to have a de facto truth value.

Before laying out his own categoreal scheme he warns the reader that all such formal schemes are strictly speaking false, due to an irremediable partiality of formulation.36 He explains in the same context that the only» reason a categoreal scheme is even needed is to prevent philosophers from thinking too much like mathematicians regarding the clarity; completeness and certainty of their activities.37 Bergson would heartily agree.

There are even signs, though one would be foolish to read too much into them, that some American Jews may finally be willing to recognize the wisdom of Kristol's advice in this regard.

To make absolute claims regarding such doctrinal statements gives too much weight to specific formulations of doctrine.

Edward Ferrars in Sense and Sensibility is a nonentity in this regard, and one fears that Henry Tilney of Northanger Abbey is too detached and ironic to be much of a pastor, though he provides both intellectual and moral training for the heroine, Catherine Morland.

Because images, in a book or in a sermon, are generally regarded as decorative and hence optional in their bearing upon the principal form and content of the communication, the imaginative preacher may have to endure such comments as «His sermons don't seem theologically weighty» or «It was too interesting to have contained much truth», or perhaps such inverted compliments as «I was much involved in your talk, or whatever it was.

Man in the High Castle disappoints, as the whiff of leftist self - regard permeates far too much of the second season.

This whiff of leftist self - regard permeates far too much of the second season.

I think that one reason for this, on both sides, is that a look at man, as he is, may give us too much confidence when we are superficial in our looking or too much despair when we only regard man's condition as «cabin'd, cribb'd, confined» and as failing so terribly in its accomplishment.

Though I think the Bible is held to too high a regard, there have been many lessons from it that has done good, and much which has done bad.

Regarding macros I stopped counting or elsewise tracking them quite some time ago because it messed too much with my head.

It's kind of the perfect dessert in that regard: you just can't eat too much at once.

I've read different things regarding vinegars and haven't come to any conclusions if I think they are good or bad — I haven't done too much research into it.

As regards our defense i won't blame the players too much for last night result, the manager is to be blamed for not fully prepared and playing players out of position, i think if the manager had called the players in a week earlier than he did, Mustafi at least would have been fit to play, but the result wasn't that bad as most fans make it seems..

«I suspect the event is a little too... too cowboy for most Easterners, though; I think they regard it as just so much ya - hoo and barbecue.»

I too have much regard for Giroud but we are never going to win the title with his standard as main striker, despite his relative success and at 31 he can not be expected to play third fiddle behind the LACAZETTE and P - MA.

Regarding Brozovic, he is a good player but not too much of an upgrade on what we have, there are better midfielders available like Nzonzi / Carvalho / Perreira / Krychowiak / Seri / Banega

L'Equipe further claim that Arsenal not having Champions League football will not be too much of a problem as the player will look to develop under Gunners boss Arsene Wenger, who has a reputation of nurturing young talent, especially in regards to Frenchmen!

Im with you Mick, I too find it almost impossible to comprehend — but I did see di Maria has come out and said pretty much the same thing regarding his torrid season.

However, the former Juventus boss needs to be careful with regards to changing too much and unsettling the balance at the club as he looks for immediate success in his first season in charge in the Premier League.

In regards to the concern about having too much on campus housing.

With regards to the money part i fully agree with fefu but with regards to showing too much humility i agree with you linez

I think we Arsenal fans should not get our hope up too much as regards Mbappe, he is definitely too costly for Arsenal and Wenger.

Manchester City, United and Liverpool, and probably Spurs would be too much to handle for Atletico and that's a group of clubs who we were once comfortably regarded as being as good as.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Love him or HATE him, the delusion one will still be our manager next season, the facts are that there's too much respect and high regards for Mr Wenger to be sacked by the board / owner and it's no secret that his contract extension is only awaiting his signature.?

(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and very few of our players are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes

Whatever your beliefs are regarding the intentions of this club moving forward, don't think for a second that it has to do with appeasing the fans, winning the highest honours and / or changing the stagnant culture that permeates this club... every decision is made for one sole purpose and that is to maintain the delicate balance between Kroenke's unyielding need to acquire more wealth and Wenger's fragile psyche, which is why we have this ridiculous wage structure that pays deadwood too much and makes it incredibly difficult to attract special players... personally I believe that Wenger's greatest fear isn't that he won't win a big trophy again but exposing himself to the overwhelming criticism he will face when people discover the totally dysfunctional state of affairs that exist at Arsenal due to his antiquated practices which have gone relatively unchecked and unchallenged since the departure of Dein

I appreciate what your saying but there's an opportunity here to go to the next level and really really become a power and we all know they wont take the chance because there's too much caution with regards to money, both from the board and Wenger.

I fear it will be Walcott and giroud up front next season as that's a cheaper option and we wont spend too much this season as per AW's previous ambiguous statements regarding the transfer window.

Just go look at the analysts discussions regarding the expansion draft and you'll see that the majority think Columbus gave up way too much.

If we conduct ourselves and apply ourselves when we do nt have the ball as we have been this season then we should come out on top but I hope we do nt miss Flamini too much in that regard.