If there are too many borders and graphics or
too much text too close together, it'll seem that you're trying to overload your resume with information.
You need to make sure this section is well formatted, doesn't have
too much text, and highlights your key skill sets to keep the reader's attention.
Too much text is an automatic reader turn off.
This means that if your resume seems too long or full of
too much text, then they will be put off at first glance — which is something that you want to avoid at all costs!
3 — C. People tune out when there is
too much text in a paragraph.
Applying the right line spacing is better than including
too much text.
For example, a letter without the correct spacing between paragraphs, or with
too much text on a page, is going to look cluttered, or a letter saved as a file type that is not meant for a text document (such as a.
Too much text (over 4 lines deep) or too dense of an executive resume and you will lose the reader.
If you have
too much text to comfortably fit two pages, don't be afraid to edit.
Too much text is overwhelming to the reader and may even stop a potential employer from reviewing your information.
I didn't want to complicate things with
too much text and left the layouts pretty simple as to not take away from the game art itself, plus it gives it a «retro» feel.
They're not going to spend a lot of time digging through
too much text or endless graphics to find what they are looking for.
Too much text there can be intimidating.
Many people assume the solution to
too much text is to either drop the point size or extend the trim size or margins.
This is an example of a book cover that just has
too much text.
Yet when it was laid out in the right format, I felt it looked like
too much text.
Is there
too much text in big, blocks of hard - to - read type?
You can have too much design elements on your book cover (like too much images or
too much text with no hierarchy) and that would look confusing to people.
When it is power point presentation for the classroom, don't use
too much text or whole speech on presentation slides.
They are not going to spend a lot of time digging through
too much text or endless graphics
This is the idea that «less is more», that your cover shouldn't include too many graphics or
too much text.
Too much text all at once puts them off.
White space is meant to help learners see what is really important and focus on that information instead of getting confused by
too much text or simply decorative images.
Too much text is overwhelming.
Avoid crowding pages with
too much text or too many images, and cut down on clutter wherever possible.
Not
too much text, don't» explain everything but have depth.
Don't drain your audience with
too much text - based eLearning content.
However,
too much text tends to complicate matters.
While the entire trailer is in Japanese and there isn't
too much text to gain new insight from in the video's...
There's wasn't
too much text outside the story mode that would need to be translated.
Bertrando3 agreed, writing, «The styling is a mess, there's way
too much text, the cover looks like ELLE magazine and Anja does not bring any energy there.
Other than that, typical VJ cover with
too much text drowning the cover subject.»
Don't use
too much text to distract from the story that you're telling in - person.
«If you've got
too much text on the screen, you can't compel an audience in any emotional way at all,» says Altman, author of the just released Why Most PowerPoint Presentations Still Suck & How You Can Make Them Even Better.
It's super annoying to make a post and then get an error message saying you can't promote it because the image has
too much text.
Often, people have a tendency to overcomplicate a presentation slide with flashy images, quirky transitions, and
too much text.
My thumbs are sore from
too much texting, face booking and baby holding.
Not exact matches
Over the years she's tried to offer more prompt replies by
text message, she said, but ultimately she realized the medium was
too much to keep up with.
But the glut of digital communication, from Facebook romances to arguments that take place solely over
text, has made Turkle worried that people have come to expect
too much from their devices.
«
Too much of the debate about monetization and the future of publishing in particular has artificially restricted itself to monetizing
text.
While we may be smart enough to benefit from the
text, maybe it is
too much to assume that it doesn't require engaging that intelleigence with some sacrifice over a period of time.
Our Lord warned enough about the experts of his day who loved long tassels, and who swore by the gold of the temple rather than the temple, to stay us from placing
too much hope in ritual and
texts to save lives.
So, while it may be problematic to make
too much of the distinction between Scripture and Christ, I think that evangelicalism will benefit from a reminder that our faith centers around the living person of Jesus Christ — the World Made Flesh — not on the sacred
texts that point to him.
Personally, I think sticking to one
text would have been better, but these men didn't seem to have
too much trouble flipping through the pages of Scripture.
The issue of freedom and determinism, even in Process and Reality, is
much too involved to pursue here.9 But Mays's discussion (PW, chapter 17) contains not one footnote to this basic
text.
Considering such
texts (and
much else) over the past months, I have found myself wondering: has not the Christian religion put far
too much emphasis on sin, and far
too little on finitude, mortality, creaturehood?
One side expects
too little from the Biblical
text; the other,
too much.
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates
too much on a few selected biblical
texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
I've heard something to this effect
too, but not just the Talmud, but that that what we have in the Masoretic
Text, was «
too messianic» and that got change, and that the» 70» or septuagint, is
much closer to the originals than the Hebrew
Text.