In one sense, it seems
too obvious an answer to the constitutional - jurisdiction version of this question, but in another it's important to trace out a pretty clear legal standard for good and bad in this context.
Not exact matches
Are you really so naive that you think you have the
answer and the rest of the world is just
too dumb to see what's so
obvious to you?
Regrettably, the
answer is often all
too obvious when your partner ponders, even if briefly, which of his cards to play.
This is an incredibly difficult question to
answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but
too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was
obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball
too long, gives the ball away cheaply far
too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so
too... Xhaka is a little
too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way
too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far
too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far
too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus
too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table
too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit
too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball
too long and he will give the ball up a little
too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter...
too slow,
too inefficient and way
too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
There is no real
answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our
obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having
too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «
too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address
obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Let me
answer some
obvious questions
too: Can we compete for the EPL title without one of these signings?
Can anyone explain to me why this story has received ZERO media coverage, or is the
answer just
too obvious?
@DVK If there is evidence that it's a very small fraction engaged, that'd
answer the question, but I discuss why this possibility alone doesn't seem to
answer the question in the 1st paragraph after the bullet list (tldr; ISIS are split between as many if not more fronts
too, so there's no
obvious reason why the % of Iraqi / Peshmerga troops engaged with ISIS would be lower than the % of ISIS fraction engaged with Peshmerga)
And investigators typically thought the
answer was
obvious — we eat
too much — and so the experiments were not worth the effort.
So what causes teeth marking and well the
answer to this is just about everything we come in to contact with will stain the teeth and this ranges from the
obvious perpetrators like coffee, tea and nicotine to stuff like cherries but the thing isnot to get
too stressed about as there's a good solution.
The fact is, it's never
too late to clean your life up and that's why I'm (re) posting this as I felt it was truly inspirational for young and older worldly people alike who are perhaps thinking of getting married and pondering the; «should I not have sex before marriage» question (the
answer to which is incredibly
obvious from reading The bible and yet we all get bogged down in questioning it's clear abstinence stance on the issue because the world confuses Christians and no - Christians alike).
Setting aside for a moment the question of when exactly it was finished, the
answers seem
obvious: there were already
too many action films jostling for position this summer (including the ill - fated Batman & Robin), and the film is just
too smart and well - crafted to have risked getting lost in that shuffle, a fate which the equally worthy Face / Off narrowly escaped.
Here
too, the
answer is an
obvious yes.
There's also the skillful art of directing the player to consider: make it
too obvious what they should be doing and where they should be going and players will feel little satisfaction in completing tasks, and yet fail to give them enough direction or well though - out hints and they'll end up going around in circles, growing frustrated until they finally discover the
answer through sheer stubbornness.
Cases will typically have two or three different outcomes that you can pick from, and the game's brilliance is that it rarely makes the correct
answer too obvious, although I have to say that Crimes and Punishments was far more subtle with its hints.
If the
answer seems
too obvious for words, Ed Winkleman, Elizabeth Dee, Richard Lehun, and Nicholas O'Donnell tally up the financial and ethical implications, while Dee looks for an
answer in Independent Projects.
The
answer is
obvious, but politicians world - wide, at least the few of those who even understand the situation, put the problem on the
too - hard pile.
Just because you are
too lazy to do a full analysis and quantify all quantities and effects does not mean that we have to take the only «
obvious» solution to the problem as the
answer:
We faced
too many issues, trying to help job seekers
answering the most
obvious questions.