Sentences with phrase «too opinion based»

I hope this question isn't too opinion based, even if I'm afraid it might be.

If that were the answer the question required, the question should be closed as «too opinion based».

Not exact matches

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

That is not to say there shouldn't be Christian or other religious values present but it is to say that people shouldn't be conned and public opinion shouldn't be manipulated by claims of righteous values — as we have seen, it is just too easy to fake and sway people to support what may not be in their best interests based on having a cloak of religion.

Top - 25 rankings are just based off of the opinions of a group of people, but public bettors often take them too seriously.

In my honest opinion, I think 3 -4-3 limits our players, particularly Ozil and other technical players.The formation is too flat therefore in most cases we will always have narrow wins unless we are playing on the counter.But hey, our playing style is based on moderate to high possession.Formations that favour possession based style are 4 -2-3-1,4-1-4-1, 4 -3-3 (holding) and for more technical players 3 -2-3-2 (3 -5-2).

Too many opinions based on perception not facts.

We hear it from our family members, our schools, our pediatricians, our politicians, parenting books that continue to be published influenced by this old - fashioned thinking despite the mountains of research to the contrary — ideas of how children should be raised, based on personal opinion rather than research - backed fact, subtle revelation of how our society is still scared of giving «too much» nurturing to our children.

It's good to see as I read far too many pieces that are muddied by personal opinions or «advice» rather than fact based information.

The cargo area is a little too small and the wheel base was too wide (in my opinion).

I think that this question is really too broad and opinion based to effectively answer on Stack Exchange (see my comment), so I will just say in passing that there are deep cultural, ideological, religious and political differences between the two that lead to these extreme actions

Also, some users thought that the question was too opinion - based, but I've posted this because there's a similar question (related to the USA) that hasn't had that response.

Far too often it seems like the phrase «evidence - based policy» is thrown around but then politicians sometimes disregard academic studies that disagree with their own opinions.

«I'm going to run against him,» he said, arguing that the governor made too many decisions based on public opinion polls.

Of course, this is not true to all older or mature singles, this is only based on opinion because some young adults are more safer too if they only use their proper judgement.

This is, in my opinion, because all too often women are viewed as being materialistic by nature based on the fact that women tend to appreciate and enjoy having nice things.

As a successful dating site of more than 8 years of experience, thousands of hundreds of married biker couples started their first date from BikerNext.Therefore, the highlight of the dating site — the section of successful stories was given birth, where you can read various kinds of love stories based on 100 % true dating experience.Whether you were once heartbroken because of a breakup, a single parent who feels it is too complicated for you to date again, or even some realists who have never believed in long - distance relationship, you can always find a true romantic experience which would be inspiring enough to reverse the deep - entrenched stereotypical opinion and encourage you to be brave enough to make the first move on this awesome dating site — BikerNext

Unlike the Greek brothers who want the world on a platter, the soft - spoken ruler is easy to empathize with, even though he too suffers from making decisions based on pride, revenge, and the miscalculated opinions of his superstitious spiritual advisers.

However, the two negative opinions I have towards this game only regarding its game - play, are that it is probably just a little too distant from the previous titles, and that much of it is based off too much luck (which gets cheap at times) for my liking.

I don't think we should base our opinions on the design too harshly as it may just be an early design / model.

Why spend years writing pitches and tweaking pitches and making more and more revisions and edits based on so many other peoples» opinions (ever heard the phrase, too many hands in the pot?)?

Before you get too far into this post, the following initial results (an opinion) with the Amazon KDP Select program are based on my personal non-fiction, niche ebook.

In my opinion, that means they should have a fixed claim on principal repayment, with risk - based capital factors high enough to take away the incentive invest too much in non-investment grade fixed income claims.

Now, to prevent this question from being marked as «too broad» or «primarily opinion based», I should clarify what I'm asking:

interesting discussion, thanks for your counter opinion Jason and cheers to this site:) please try to keep the discussion fact based and unemotional too guys, good investing is done without emotions.

It's too vague and is based entirely on opinion and not fact.

A responsible skeptic will request that you remain open minded to opinions from both sides, and consider the uncertainties involved * without * prejudging them based on the demonstrable human predilection toward a «herd mentality» — by «herd mentality», I mean that once a consensus is formed, a flock of «me too» science papers become much more easily accepted, by peer review journals, than the skeptics» papers.

I think he is fundamentally mistaken on this point and his too - frequent absolutist statements based on preliminary science are a classic example of why «consensus» reports are both more careful and more correct than an individual opinion.

On no more than the basis that «climate change is occurring», moral philosophers tell us what is right, social historians invent lessons from history to make climate criminals in the present, science historians invent conspiracy theorists, and psychologists tell us how to apply distress to change public opinion, and why debate is just too risky to trust to the public.

Obsolete, because: (1) it uses the least experienced of legally - trained people as the basis of the most important legal service — legal advice and opinions — and, (2) because it is too cost - inefficient.

For example, Madam Justice Deschamps wrote a concurring opinion in Alberta Teachers» Association on the view that judicial deference is based upon the principle of relative expertise or experience in a particular area, and thus a bare assertion of a presumption of deference simply because a statutory decision - maker is interpreting its home statute pays too little attention to whether the statutory decision - maker actually has sufficient expertise or experience to justify deference to its determination of a legal question (Alberta Teachers» Association at paras 82 — 89).

For too long in this area of law, judges have set out operational rules based on their own personal views of the proper relationship between the judiciary and administrative decision - makers and their own freestanding opinions — not well - settled doctrine and well - accepted principles of a longstanding and durable nature.

I note that the majority of the SCC of Canada made this point expressly in the 2001 TWU decision (I note too that the dissenting opinion consisted of Justice Heureux Dube and can be dismissed on that basis alone — though it's also a very poor reasoned opinion).

Speaking of court Ross Wilson, my opinion is neither cynical nor based on negative experience, I just simply refuse to place any of my clients in such a precarious position — I like and respect them far too much to diminish the service I promised to provide and immediately deny any buyer expecting I'd be more than happy to give them a break in price because I'd get all the commission — after all, every single one always say that to me, to every Realtor I know who has been so approached.

But this particular issue is tied to the cold hard reality of there being too few registrants like you (and a few others who have commented herein on this subject, both pro and con vis a vis my opinion) out there, but far, far too many unlike you (the incompetents, the ethically challenged) out there which the public in general does not want to be tied to on a contractual basis when looking to buy vs. sell.