Sentences with phrase «too uncertain»

We reserve the right to value less frequently than daily in extreme circumstances, where the value of the assets may be too uncertain.

Pynchon says that since 90 percent of all litigation involving people (not corporations) will end with a retired judge telling these people that litigation is too expensive and a jury trial too uncertain for them to bear, why not just litigate virtually, «giving the parties the experience of litigation that will eventually drive them to settlement?»

It's just too uncertain for both lawyer and client.

There is nothing new in questioning the function of, and relationship between, the «selling arrangement», the «insignificant» effects criterion, and the concept of effects «too uncertain and indirect» as limits on the scope of the Treaty freedoms.

How can such decisions be rationalised with the continued application of the «selling arrangement», the «insignificant» effects criterion, and the concept of effects «too uncertain and indirect»?

On the one hand, it relies on the «selling arrangement», the criterion of «insignificant» effects, and the concept of effects «too uncertain and indirect» to place certain non-discriminatory Member State measure beyond review against the Treaty freedoms.

«Based on the evidence presented to me, I can not come to any conclusion other than the services provided in British Columbia today are too little, their longevity or consistency too uncertain.

The principal complementary devices are (1) the criterion of «insignificant» effects and (2) the concept of «effects too uncertain and indirect.»

The point is, there is no real scientific justification in assuming a strong positive vapour feedback in the first place as it all comes down to your initial assumptions about a) natural variation, and b) aerosols, both of which are acknowledged to be too uncertain to make such assumptions.

But, its just seems wrong to then go on to say that the science is just too uncertain, and that climate scientists don't know enough to get involved in policy issues.

1989 Fossil - fuel and other U.S. industries form Global Climate Coalition to tell politicians and the public that climate science is too uncertain to justify action.

However, its unlikely that any climate models have incorporated the physical processes involved as they are just too uncertain, controversial and speculative at this time.

For decades, one of the main tools in the arsenal of those seeking to prevent actions to reduce emissions has been to declare the that the science is too uncertain to justify anything.

Basically, we could just say that this is all too uncertain and thus any attempts at prognosticating are useless or actually likely to be biased and / or counterproductive.

The main conclusions of the Cosmos paper, including the most - referred - to quotes like «Look before you leap» and «The scientific basis for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time,» both appeared before the publication of the Cosmos article, in a separate paper authored by Fred Singer alone in the journal ES&T (see archived PDF here).

Exxon used the American Petroleum Institute, right - wing think tanks, campaign contributions and its own lobbying to push a narrative that climate science was too uncertain to necessitate cuts in fossil fuel emissions.

Infilling occurs in the USHCN network in two different cases: when the raw data is not available for a station, and when the PHA flags the raw data as too uncertain to homogenize (e.g. in between two station moves when there is not a long enough record to determine with certainty the impact that the initial move had).

This highlights an inconsistent view of uncertainty, and an unwillingness to weigh the evidence: «If it causes cooling, the uncertainty (or lack of evidence) doesn't matter; if it causes warming, it's too uncertain (and no evidence strong enough) to matter».

Some argued that it was overly optimistic or too uncertain because it left out most ecological detail, while others said it was possibly overly pessimistic, based on what we know from species responses and apparent resilience to previous climate change in the fossil record — see below.

The science is, purportedly, too uncertain to take steps to stabilize emissions as there are opposing theories as to why the climate is changing, differences in opinion as to how atmospheric concentrations of GHGs will affect the climate and various viewpoints on whether changes will be good or bad; beneficial or dangerous.

my point was made in this thread https://judithcurry.com/2011/01/24/probabilistic-estimates-of-climate-sensitivity/ too uncertain to even put probabilities on this, IMO.

2 (Recent warming is unprecedented over the past millennium): I would agree with Judith that this is far too uncertain.

That same year he wrote: «The scientific base for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time.»

In the area of advertising, however, the figures and sources of data are too uncertain to arrive at totals and comparisons for either side.

«One year later, in a discussion of Senator Gore's book Earth In Balance, Gregg Easterbrook notes that Senator Gore failed to mention that» «before his death last year, Revelle published a paper that concludes, «The scientific basis for greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic» action at this time.»»

Since then, while debate continues between the two camps, it has been much more civil, with researchers on both sides conceding the data is problematic, and that it is probably too uncertain to establish conclusively whether the cyclonic activity of the 1990s and 2000s were unusual or not.

I suppose they could say that it's possibly quite high, but its all too uncertain etc etc..

The more likely reason is related to her desire to convey the message that levels of climate change are too uncertain to be bothered about.

In March 2001, George W. Bush's administration declared that climate science was «too uncertain» to justify action (such as ratifying the Kyoto treaty) that might put the brakes on economic growth.

However the complexity of sea surface makes for instance any application of Henry's law be too uncertain, even impossible, to reach any quantitative results concerning the influence of global sea surface temperature on the CO2 content in atmosphere.

Despite some initial sympathy for the claims that the climate is too complex to analyse and any projection too uncertain to be useful, I was persuaded by the History of the development of the science, a close contemporary of Darwinian evolution.

«on timescales below 17 years, we have to admit natural variability is going to make climate trend detection too uncertain to be worth discussing, until we get past the 17th year, and preferably 30 years or more.»

However, on timescales below 17 years, we have to admit natural variability is going to make climate trend detection too uncertain to be worth discussing, until we get past the 17th year, and preferably 30 years or more.

If the data is too uncertain to show it then you can't claim it.

He said the data was too uncertain to be sure.

I find it tremendously ironic that many of the same people who are saying «AGW is too uncertain» are now advocating that we quit funding the science.

The dating is too uncertain; the frequency is too low.

The great global - warming debate has taken shape around those who say the science is too uncertain to justify action and those who warn that we can not afford the luxury of waiting for science to answer all our questions.

Climate etc itself has become an advocacy group peddling the message that the science is all just too uncertain and therefore there is no case for action to mitigate climate change.

While it is a scientist's job to answer genuine scientific questions, getting pulled into contrarian linguistic frames helps maintain the fiction that the science is still riven with fundamental equivocations and therefore too uncertain to form a reliable basis for public policy.

Rather, contrarians put forward a number of different objections such as: «it's the sun»; «it's ocean cycles», «it's undersea volcanoes», «it's planetary cycles», «it's cosmic waves»; «the CO2 comes out of the ocean»; «it's all too uncertain» and so on.

They do not include «rapid and dynamical changes in ice flow», because the IPCC was too uncertain about how likely or influential these changes might be.

Of the many inane arguments that are made against taking action on climate change, perhaps the most fatuous is that the projections climate models offer about the future are too uncertain to justify taking steps that might inconvenience us in the present.

But at some point, both the temperature data and the CO2 data are too uncertain to give a precise value to that effect.

The result, says an article they published in the journal Climatic Change, is «a misguided perception that climate science is too uncertain to play any significant role in policy decisions.»

a cadre of scientists who share the industry's views of climate science and to train them in public relations so they can help convince journalists, politicians and the public that the risk of global warming is too uncertain to justify controls on greenhouse gases, â??

I agree the OHC data are incompatible with a predominately internal contribution (although I'm sure Judith would argue those data are too uncertain, though I don't think anyone has argued OHC decreasing over the last half - century, at least not at the ocean basins / depths that communicate with the atmosphere on the relevant timescales).

Dan H. has long held (in classic denier fashion) that the climate feedbacks are too uncertain to accurately constrain the climate sensitivity to the values that the IPCC has determined are the consensus opinion.

1989 Fossil - fuel and other U.S. industries form the Global Climate Coalition to tell politicians and the public that climate science is too uncertain to justify action.

S. Fred Singer, 1990: «My conclusion can be summed up in a simple message: The scientific base for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic actin at this time.