Sentences with phrase «took much issue»

While she apparently initially took much issue with the role, as it was practically non-existent in the original script, it was expanded upon once she agreed to do the film.
As readers are probably aware, I haven't taken much issue with temperature data other than pressing the field to be more transparent.

Not exact matches

These are very deep - seeded systemic issues that take a long time to resolve, but with authors and activists like Leader - Chivée at the helm, progress just might move forward that much quicker.
What's more is that Eisenberg failed to have a commanding presence on screen, feeling too much like a spazzed out tech genius with serious inadequacy issues than anyone who could exhibit the confidence it takes to rule over Metropolis.
The company has avoided much of the issues that have derailed its peers, and while its stock price did take a hit over the summer after it cut its production guidance, it's still in good shape.
Successfully addressing such an issue will take much more time and effort, and will have a lower chance of getting the desired pay - off — the «thumbs up» rating in the impending follow - up email.
While some observers take issue with the suggestion that the city is in some way «closed for business,» others wonder if Ford's penny - pinching, tax - cutting agenda goes much beyond the platitudes that helped vault him into the city's top office.
You could argue that McInerney inherited several problems at the company, but none of those issues has shown much sign of improvement since he took the reins.
The legal issues that followed the initial 2014 contest meant the contest didn't happen that year, much to the disappointment of fans who had taken Buffet at his word that he wanted the contest to be easier to win in 2015.
In response, lawmakers like Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee, said that although Facebook's revelation was a good first step, «I'm disappointed it's taken 10 months of raising this issue before they've become much more transparent.»
However, the accessibility issue mainly concerns workers in part - time and nonstandard jobs who take much more than a «couple of months» to accumulate 360 paid hours.
The first is legacy: that most firms still have so much «clean - up» to do to fix longstanding technology and data issues that have built up over the years: systems don't talk with one another; data aggregation takes days or weeks, when the needs are really more immediate; and data quality isn't what it needs to be.
Step 5: In the next few years, the U.S. Treasury can be expected to issue up to $ 1.5 trillion in new Treasury debt to the public, taking in much of the $ 1.5 trillion in base money created by the Fed in Step 1.
Does it take fear of a refugee crisis for Mr. Trump to make the disaster as much of a front burner issue as a perceived lack of patriotism by some of the 1,700 or so players in the National Football League?
I liken this to a scuba diver who goes down and he has about an hour's worth of air, and then he's got ta come back up again and either get another tank or refill his tank, so you're limited on how much air you can have if you're scuba diving, but in business, unless you have a scuba diving type business, you don't wan na have to keep having to refill your tank, and so that's the issue that I see faces a lot of entrepreneurs and startups, is the amount of time and energy it takes to raise money for your business.
Now, if a company takes its IPO proceeds and invests them in cash and marketable securities, then as long as it doesn't generate net losses or other liabilities, the company must be worth at least the value of those assets, regardless of how much money was raised by issuing stock.
These days it takes much longer, because there is no observable difference between the currency units that are being issued today and the ones that were issued in the past.
From time to time, you might be called for some maintenance issues, but normally they don't take that much time and effort.
The issue is, a lot of people don't have a lot of money to invest, and they also can't afford to take too much risk because they don't have that much to invest.
In recent issues of The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor I've covered the U.S. government's ongoing «War on Cash»... how our government is trying to take over the Internet with the latest push for «net neutrality»... the risks and advantages of digital currency like bitcoin... how U.S. banks are preparing for «bail - ins» during the next financial crisis... how the U.S. government is using Common Core to indoctrinate children so they'll submit to the coming socialist society... and much, much more.
Barlow was much more prepared this time and took Smith to task on a number of issues of local concern.
I'd MUCH rather be in a church that takes 600-1200 years to study the issue.
The biggest problem with how people voted for President is that social issues took too much of a precedent.
Mr. Muhammed Ali Jinnah, hitherto a nationalist, was so much impressed by his discussions with Iqbal that he took up the cause for Pakistan and made it a live issue from then on.
General human nature can always take some other issue to fill in the so called void, even a currently open issue that didn't get as much attention previously.
But not everyone agrees with us on this issue and the families of those who want nature to take it's course sacrifice so much and love while they do it.
I ended up taking much of the material I had developed on that issue — how Christians relate to the wider society — out of that book.
I'm not sure I understand a) why atheism is mentioned in response to an article on abortion (since atheists also take both sides on this issue), and b) why there is so much fear and stereotyping about atheism in general.
The two groups were highly polarized on these two issues, differing almost as much as they did on the abortion items, with the NRLC being much more likely than the NARAL to take the «pro-life» position.
Given the range of pressing moral issues that Küng takes up (including war genocide and ecological destruction), I would not make so much of this issue except for two things.
However, China takes issue with the agreement, saying that it would interfere with their nuclear interests, and as much has threatened South Korea's economy.
Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like to..
They need to be able to explain to members what is happening in processes of debate and resolution; and to do that in the midst of an often emotional give - and - take is much more difficult than preparing a sermon on a social issue.
Although I am a Sikh, I do not wear a turban and have no problem with them checking for security issues but what I don't understand is that they can scan through pretty much everything so why do they need to take «extra attention» to the turban?
Churchmen tend to take issue with much of what he writes, in my opinion because they do not like him.
I don't think of Alise's belief as denial so much as a difference of opinion, akin to taking opposite sides on a political issue.
To describe the Church as a community of memory and hope, sharing in the common memory not only of Jesus Christ but also of the mighty deeds of God known by Israel, expecting the coming into full view of the kingdom on earth and / or in heaven; to describe it further as the community of worship, united by its direction toward one God, who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet worshipped more as Father or as Son or as Holy Spirit in this or that part of the community; to describe it as a community of thought in which debate and conflict can take place because there is a fundamental frame of agreement and because there are common issues of great import — to do all this and the much more that needs to be done would be to essay the work of a large part of theology.
Instead of skirting the issue, much of the heat the catholic church is taken would probably be alleviated by simply just requiring those in power to report abuse to local authorities and levying swift and severe punishment on those who condone and cover up abuses.
But it matters little as far as the main message of the Apostle is concerned, for what concerned him was not so much the specific doctrines at issue, but (or so I think) the fact that any doctrine, any putative representation of the «wisdom of the world,» should take the place of the Gospel that is the «word of the cross.»
Many acting like the Three Wise Monkeys on this particular issue if they believe and have that much faith in their bibles they should take it all and all signs not just take the bits they like or fits situations?
Though such theological murders are not as common today, they still do take place in various parts of the world, though generally, the issues are not as much over theological issues, but economic and social issues.
Agreed, only I'd take it a step much further — this is obviously how he truly feels, so it's liley this is how he's felt for many years and give him position of running a facility for priests to «get away» during times of stress — it would be interesting to see if he harbored priests accused / involved in abuse — if so, then he's part of the issue and should be prosecuted accordingly.
Instead he only wants to talk about what will get a rise... Does he protest so much that we take our eyes off the real issues?
Yourgrau has a talent for raising uncomfortable issues, and his slim biography of Weil will outrage Christians as much as Jews, for he takes Weil's side against her detractors from both religions.
He also thinks Barth is too much of a «biblicist,» which I take to mean that despite Barth's often fascinating and imaginative exegesis there are some issues that require much more of a theologian than exegesis alone.
It took me a long time (and an absurd number of yelling matches) to see my wife's «issues» were actually just a reflection of much deeper brokenness in me.
However, adopting statements is easy compared to the much longer journey the Church must take as it begins to fully grasp the magnitude of this dark issue in our midst.
It seems strange that we can all hear God on fairly trivial matters — which church to attend, which course to study, which job to take — but on big issues dividing the Church, we seem to hear much less clearly.
My only issue is that the chicken took much longer to cook than in the recipe.
I get more affirmation of our research as I explain all these issues, which exposes the claims of anti-GM groups that we are taking too much time to develop Golden Rice.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z