Sentences with phrase «took on bank loans»

Not exact matches

For instance, Wanda no longer has to record debts associated with those theme parks and hotels; all it has is the bank loan it took out to advance money to Sunac, which is now taking on the property and related leverage.

The bank sought to fill the gap with a $ 200,000 SBA loan, something Wald wanted to avoid at all costs, recalling the consequences of the $ 30,000 SBA loan he'd received in 1996 (and since paid off): NetForce had trouble securing the kind of financing it needed because the SBA had taken a blanket lien on all the company's assets.

«Taking a focused look at clarifying the regulatory environment around online lending, reducing some of the burdens of regulation on small and community banks, and reducing the burdens on community banks so they can go back to making more small - dollar loans is a good thing,» she says.

Taking into account that banks and traditional financial institutions tend to not offer loans to cannabis businesses for the time being, many cannabis entrepreneurs fall back on family members and friends for seed capital — and this is probably the way to go at first.

Mosaic's business model is similar to that of a bank: It charges an origination fee up front to the developer and takes a 1 % «skim» on top of the loan.

In the aftermath of Zirtual's failure, Young, who was on the board, reflected on the entrepreneurial struggle and asked, «What about taking out an old - fashioned bank loan?»

Private lenders are looking for the same information and will conduct similar due diligence as the banks, but they typically specialize in an industry and are more willing to take on higher - risk loans if they see the potential.

Banks prefer to write loans based on the value of specific assets and take liens on those specific assets.

Amongst other things, banks and other lenders need to consider the risks they are taking on, not just from individual loans, but from the collective effects of lending decisions on the system as a whole.

The Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project (NEDAP), which brought the suit against Chase on plaintiffs» behalf, says banks shouldn't be willing to let online payday lenders take money out of customer accounts in states where such loans are illegal.

Most of WeLab's borrowers are individuals and small businesses who don't have enough established credit to take out loans from traditional banks at a low interest rate and typically rely on friends and family or microloan programs instead.

Short Sales — A bank will often take less than the loan amount on a property to save the hassle and costs of foreclosing.

MEII took the additional step of training loan officers at the participating local banks on how to evaluate risk — a skill most local loan officers lacked.

In general, banks that lend money for mortgages or other loans take a look at the credit histories of everyone whose name is on the loan application.

The impact of higher oil prices on the country's current account deficit and inflation rate, the Indian banking system's struggles with demonetization, scandals, bad loans and a government looking ahead to next year's general election have all taken a toll on investor sentiment.

Finance brokers meet with clients (business owners) who are looking for funding to launch or expand their businesses, but for whom traditional bank loans are either inaccessible, or undesirable because they don't want to take on any extra debt.

WASHINGTON — President Obama pressured the heads of the nation's biggest banks on Monday to take «extraordinary» steps to revive lending for small businesses and homeowners, drawing a firm commitment from one large bank to make more loans and vaguer assurances from others.

A bank can foreclose on a home that has $ 100 in outstanding loans as easily as it can take a home with $ 1 million in outstanding loans — in fact, much easier.

Moreover, regulators don't want banks using loan participations to take on credit risks they don't understand and can't control or indirectly do what would otherwise be prohibited on a standalone basis.

With the majority of the fixed income world taking sides on prize fights like Greece, the European Central Bank (ECB), inflation, and energy - related debt, you may have missed the beating leveraged loans have been receiving in the media.

if they can find Banks willing to take a «long «position that will allow them to have a non-expanding debt load and interest only payments on a loan, they might be able to withstand the low price cycle until opec led by Saudi Arabia can get world producers to curtail production and elevate prices to a point where all producers are making some money.

Proof, something that not one religion has you take your religion on faith, and that doesn't fly in this world, try telling a bank to give you a loan of faith, try convicting someone of a crime based on faith, try claiming ownership over something on faith.

BLA BLA BLA BLA SAME ALL SAME ALL we need some excitement in our club new blood new frontiers go places where no Arsenal manager has gone before, i here Benidorm is nice this time of the year, I hate myself for getting too involved with football i should of taken up Flamingo dancing, just think four hours spent on dancing with the ladies rather then reading Arsenal articles on why we are so crap in the eyes of the world and most important Michael Owen, stress of having over 170 million in the bank but we can only spend 20 million + 1 pound and knowing we will sell this January and get someone on loan so just to add to the 170 million why o why o why,

regarding the stadium, all economist knew that we had to expand on the capacity or we were going backwards, the board took a vote, it was passed that we would develop a new stadium, accounts were produced bank loans were excepted, AW was asked if he can take on the huge task of staying in the EPL with a shoe string budget, he excepted the challenge did a great job until we got rich but AW LOST THE ART OF SPENDING and forgot how to manage top players,

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

In other words, you're taking a loan on your account in the Bank of Good Will that you are promising to pay back, with interest if necessary.

20 per cent of the gross interest might actually be more than the profits the bank ends up earning on that loan (once it takes its business expenses and US tax into account).

Many businesses are taking a wait - and - see approach about decisions coming out of Washington, before taking on new debt through loans, a top M&T Bank executive said.

The group is urging the bank to take responsibility for maintaining buildings that they've foreclosed on after issuing property owners unsustainable loans.

Competition among global banks is good for small businesses and will provide better rates on loans taken out by small to medium enterprises, the shadow business secretary told Daybreak.

The military practically abolished Nigeria's federal system in favour of a unitary, distributive economy in which we all shared proceeds of oil; they created more and more states eroding sub-national economic viability; they nationalized and indigenized banks and declared that government would hold the «commanding heights» of our economy, marginalizing investment and the private sector brought in «big government»; they implemented «Udoji awards» and other elements of oil and FX subsidies that Nigeria battles to overcome today; and the about - to - depart government of Murtala / Obasanjo took the first $ 1billion jumbo loan that set Nigeria on the path to debt peonage!

Adapted from Michael Lewis's bestselling book The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, Adam McKay's stylized comedic take on the international banking collapse of 2007 - 08 nerds up Steve Carell, Ryan Gosling, Brad Pitt and an Oscar - baiting Christian Bale as real - life money - managing eccentrics who, independently, come to realize a market based on subprime loans is going to tank.

It's the dealers who have signed personal guarantees on loans from banks and have taken out second and third mortgages on their homes to finance their dealership operations.

As it turns out this dealership is fairly incompetent at the paperwork as it took them a little over 5 months to finally get the title transferred (this was after multiple calls from me to them, the bank that serviced my loan, and a final complaint to secretary of state) in that time I received 1 and only 1 call from the dealership after I made a complaint to secretary of state updating me on the progress.

Similarly, if you default on your automobile loan, your car can be repossessed — which means the bank takes ownership of it.

Because banks take on less risk than they would with a traditional loan, financing for veterans is more accessible.

Of course, if you're planning on taking out a loan, your banking situation will become more complicated, and the best bank will most likely be one that you can visit in person.

This is essential when seeking approval for online loans as, with no branch to visit, an online lender relies on bank accounts to both issue loan funds to and take monthly repayments from.

Traditional banks and credit unions have tightened their credit policies and do not usually take on large unsecured loans, especially for those with bad credit.

One common problem experienced by those with bad credit is that many banks will require a guarantor or cosigner on any loan that they take.

Due to some of these factors the borrower may not be able to take a loan or mortgage on their property from Canadian banks or other financial institutions.

With bad credit, getting a personal loan can prove to be quite difficult because banks don't want to take on too much risk when lending to someone who has a bad history with borrowing.

If you got a loan with 20 % down and a good income, you're taking on some risk of your own and putting some skin in the game, and hopefully you've thought about it more... so the bank is going to be happier with your incentives.

In today's economy more and more people put purchases on credit cards or take out personal bank loans just to make ends meet.

If a borrower defaults on a personal loan, the bank can not take the borrower's assets.»

A debt consolidation loan can take the form of a second mortgage on your home (also called a home equity loan), a line of credit or a bank loan secured by some other asset or guaranteed by a family member or friend.

Doing research on how to boost your credit score fast can result in so - called financial «experts» giving misguided advice, such as taking out a small loan from your bank to buy a car.

Dealerships take a loan from the bank and tack on a few percentages to the interest for themselves.

Be prepared to hand over information from bank statements, credit reports, or other financial documents that can help prove that you are ready to take on this loan.

Even if you don't have the money on hand, you may want to consider taking out a bank loan or borrowing from friends or family.