The collapse of the Sc clouds occurs because, as the free - tropospheric longwave opacity increases with increased CO2 and water vapor concentrations, the turbulent mixing that is driven by cloud -
top radiative cooling weakens, and therefore is unable to maintain the Sc layer.
Not exact matches
That's far from the worst flaw in his calculation, since his two biggest blunders are the neglect of the
radiative cooling due to sulfate aerosols (known to be a critical factor in the period in question) and his neglect of the many links in the chain of physical effects needed to translate a
top of atmosphere
radiative imbalance to a change in net surface energy flux imbalance.
A compelling argument for the positive longwave response is a leading alternate to Lindzen's IRIS although it receives less attention, and is known as the FAT hypothesis (from Dennis Hartmann) and arises from the fundamental physics of convection only heating the atmosphere where
radiative cooling is efficient, and thus the temperature at the
top of convective cloudiness should be near constant as it becomes warmer.
@RI: More CO2 raises the optical depth (in layman speak, the
top of the GHG
radiative «fog» above which IR is free to radiate to space and
cool).
More CO2 raises the optical depth (in layman speak, the
top of the GHG
radiative «fog» above which IR is free to radiate to space and
cool).
This unique feature of the Antarctic atmosphere has been shown to result in a negative greenhouse effect and a negative instantaneous
radiative forcing at the
top of the atmosphere (RFTOA: INST), when carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are increased, and it has been suggested that this effect might play some role in te recent
cooling trends observed over East Antarctica.
The presence of BC resulted in positive
radiative forcing in the atmosphere leading to warming effect (+ 2.1 W / m2) whereas
cooling was observed at the
top of the atmosphere (− 0.4 W / m2) and at surface (− 2.5 W / m2).
The higher cloud
tops have less atmosphere above them to hinder
radiative cooling to space so they
cool faster without getting warmer.
Your claim proven as a theorem now means basically (with some
radiative cooling at the
top for the return flow) that it does not need confirmation by numerical modelling, but rather, application, to see how it plays out in real atmospheric problems.
The evaporative, conductive and
radiative processes combined then set up a thermal gradient causing an upward flow of energy from water to air from where that 1 mm layer touches the ocean bulk below, up across the
cooler layer then to the Knudsen layer by reversing the normal (warm at the
top and
cool at the bottom) temperature gradient which exists from that 1 mm layer down to the ocean bottom.