Sentences with phrase «topic here»

We previously discussed this case and the topic here and here.

And 2 and 3 are really more of requests for legal advice, which are off topic here on LSE.

Professor Lande and Peter Benner engaged in an interesting dialogue on this topic here and then published a paper detailing the results of his interviews with a number of U.S. senior business executives.

There are a few conclusions that I have made at this early stage: (1) this research is needed more than I originally anticipated and I am already certain that I will only scratch the tip of a large iceberg (there is more than one PhD topic here); (2) the standards, rules and codes are not helpful; and (3) the process will provide the margins of accepted norms, but I anticipate three distinct spheres of behaviours will emerge — one for each ADR process.

Most recently, in R v Oakes, 2016 ABCA 90, the case that is my topic here, the majority ruling of Justices Myra Bielby and Frederica Schutz, at para. 11, adopted the opinion in R v Truscott (2007), 225 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont CA) where a unanimous five member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal stated, at para. 110, that the power to overturn a conviction founded in a miscarriage of justice, ``... can reach virtually any kind of error that renders the trial unfair in a procedural or substantive way.»

We do not assist with the return of security deposits but you can find out more information about this topic here.

The offshore outsourcing speaker was lawyer Gavin Birer of Legalwise Outsourcing Inc. (who wrote a good introductory article on the topic here on SLAW earlier this summer).

First of all, you're basically asking for a wide range of legal advice, which is off - topic here for any number of reasons.

Reason I ask is that you're close to asking for specific legal advice, which is off topic here.

See my blog on the topic here and the LinkedIn Legal Tech Interoperability group which I moderate.

Apple in legal practice is a popular topic here at Lawyerist, as well as, around the web.

2) However, understanding the reasons behind anti-science (in general, and this particular one as well) is actually a serious research topic here and there in academe.

RC also had some posts on the same generic topic here and here.

In this case the paper opens up by saying the topic is oceanic warm pools and the topic here is anomalous warming of the abyssal ocean.

And — the topic here — it was the occasion for a formal, day - long, plenary workshop on the topic of «Equitable Access to Sustainable Development» (hereafter «EASD»).

I cited Saur et al in my May 31, 2008 post on the topic here.

Note that greenhouse effects are critical on Earth, but play no part for the much simpler case of the Moon, which is the proper topic here.

I have a mathematical physics treatise on this topic here: http://theoilconundrum.blogspot.com/2013/03/ocean-heat-content-model.html

Thanks for these additional comments, and thanks also for the RC for allowing this brief foray into a subject which I am sure are far beyond the topic here.

topic here at TreeHugger, for good reason; they can provide an alternative to gas or electric heating, and generally have fewer particulate emissions than burning wood.

[Response: A quick reminder that nuclear energy is always off topic here.

And I am going off topic here, sorry... Seeding reasonable doubt to sink a scientific theory is not exactly brand new.

Rather than continue on this topic here, I will discuss it in more detail after we construct the fault tree below.

Forget about creationists (that is not the topic here, as you know full well).

«Well Zeke Hausfather's article was about measured temperatures, not about proxies, thus you are changing the topic here...»

Well Zeke Hausfather's article was about measured temperatures, not about proxies, thus you are changing the topic here, but what makes you saying what you just claimed?

My second topic here used to be Europe and the European Union.

I know it's off topic here but since Tom P has mentioned DO I will repost a comment I made there that is still in moderation.

As this is directly on topic here, I'd be curious to hear your source for confidence on < 2 ° C climate sensitivity.

Where I wrote PDA's question (first comment on this post): «As this is directly on topic here, I'd be curious to hear your source for confidence on 1 ° C climate sensitivity.»

Joshua == > Please, your (or anyone's) political views are just off - topic here.

Before we get way off the topic here in offending and defending Phil Jones and CRU, I would think we should note that the current situation involves the inability of CRU to provide to the all of the historical the raw data used in producing the value added data set.

Let's try to stay on topic here.

Sorry, Martin, but things which destroy the entire universe are off topic here.

More on that topic here.

They could have posted as a Discussion topic here at Bishop Hill without even asking the host, and I very much doubt that [Montford] would have removed it.

This sounds like it may just be a waffle to avoid the real topic here, but I'll assume for now that it was an honest question.

# Eli (# 19)- Thanks for these additional comments, and thanks also for the RC for allowing this brief foray into a subject which I am sure are far beyond the topic here.

Im getting comments back that Im not on topic here when surely the primary criterion for determining what proposed action is reasonable and appropriate depends on our common perception of what is real.

There are two points topic here.

He went off topic here, but that's his business.

Iremain to be convinced, but an article on sunspots by an appropriate expert would make a good discussion topic here if Judith is listening.

Sorry to go off - topic here but it appears that the denialosphere (one blogger in particular who shall remain nameless) have already picked up on SKS's sidebar gray flash countdown thingy.

Policy makers need clarity of information, and the communication to them by scientists (the topic here) needs to be clear in what is said.

If you can not do this with your resources, then further discussion of this topic here is useless.

(See Finlay Colville's alternative view on this topic here - he argues that a shakeout in China would encourage more upgrading.)

I have written this comment up as a post at my own place as it is a bit off topic here I welcome your response over there.

I published an Op Ed in the National Post on a similar topic here http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=66

Debate on physicsforum and don't raise the topic here!

However, policy is not our topic here.