Not exact matches
Topics are presented
in a
logical and accessible style
in order to enhance the usefulness of the book as a reference volume.
It sometimes felt that it jumped from
topic to
topic, without always being
in a
logical order, however each new
topic was interesting, so this didn't impact my enjoyment.
Mixed
in with the text, which discusses
in logical order the different facets of presidential elections, are numerous sidebars describing such diverse
topics as presidents who won the popular vote but lost the election, third - party candidates, the
order of succession
in the event that something happens to the president, first ladies, and vice presidents who went on to become presidents.
I have tried to
order the sheets
in a
logical way, although not necessarily
in «difficulty»
order, the
topics are grouped.
Have students establish, individually or
in a group, a
logical order of
topics (general to specific, first step to last step, etc.).
It must also contain the major
topics and the subtopics
in a
logical order to explain the rationale to support your facts and become more credible.
However, afterward, he outlines these written materials to check, whether the
topics appear
in the most
logical order and are given proper emphasis.
Now compare the
logical standard above with that of Vincentrj, who is trying to make Argument from ignorance
in order to confuse us, and he didn't even explain how his troll relates to the
topic at hand.
The
topics are arranged
in logical order like a school curriculum, so it starts at the beginning with «How to Install Apps,» then progressively covers more difficult
topics as you learn.