Sentences with phrase «tort auto insurance laws»
They have tort auto insurance laws that are in many ways the opposite of no fault laws.
http://www.autos.com/
Clearly, no fault and tort auto insurance law differ greatly in the way they set up the specifics of insurers» and policy holders» rights and responsibilities regarding both groups» response in the aftermath of a car accident.
Not exact matches
Jason manages litigation dockets in the areas of construction defects, auto accident liability, premises liability, first party insurance claims, products liability, contracts, personal injury, employment law, consumer law, and toxic torts.
University of Southern Colorado - Business Law, Business Law II Pueblo People's Law School: Tort Law, Auto Litigation, Insurance, Professional Negligence, Civil Procedure CLE Presentation - Recent Problems in Dealing with No Fault Cases, May 1991 CLE Chair, CTLA - Hot Topics in Personal Injury, May 1992 CLE Presentation - Biomechanic Experts in Auto Litigation, October 1992
In tort states like Illinois, each time an automobile accident happens, law enforcement and each auto insurance corporation will decide which driver caused the crash.
Mississippi auto insurance does not follow the no - fault laws since it is a Tort state.
For US auto insurance this is the most common kind of tort — it's clear that an accident is most likely to involve some form of contributory negligence for which a party (or parties) to that accident will most likely be held liable in a court of law.
Lawmakers in the State of Mississippi designed the state's auto insurance laws to be similar to those of most states around the country; this particular system is known as the «tort» system.
Iowa follows the «tort» system for their auto insurance laws, like many other states across the nation.
Like the majority of states, lawmakers in Washington DC chose to operate the District's auto insurance laws under the «tort» system.
Why Colorado Dropped PIP Car Insurance On July 1, 2003, Colorado became the latest in a string of U.S. states to repeal no fault auto insurance law and go back to a tort based reaInsurance On July 1, 2003, Colorado became the latest in a string of U.S. states to repeal no fault auto insurance law and go back to a tort based reainsurance law and go back to a tort based read more...
People who espouse this sort of belief think that no fault is superior to tort law because if no one gets assigned blame, then no one's insurance rates need increase in the wake of an auto collision.
Tort law as applied to US auto insurance covers the harm that one party visits on another either by intention or by...
As is typical with many states, Georgia auto insurance laws follow a «tort» system, which means that in an accident, someone will be considered «at fault» and that person and their insurance company will be on the hook for damages.