Sentences with phrase «tort car insurance systems»

Not exact matches

After all, the existing tort - liability system is flexible enough to cover autonomous cars, and accident victims are extremely likely to go after automakers with deep pockets for product liability suits rather than individuals with auto insurance policies with lower limits.

Alberta has a tort system (or «at - fault» insurance approach) for bodily injury and car damage liability but uses «no - fault» approach to accident benefits coverage.

New Jersey offers a unique way to purchase car insurance - East Brunswick drivers can choose to either work under a tort system (the driver who is at fault for the accident pays the damage) or a no fault system (every driver is responsible for his / her own damages, regardless of who is at fault).

The tort system mandates liability coverage to pay for medical bills and car repairs for accident victims, but drivers can now choose to purchase additional medical coverage for themselves based on their health insurance and personal financial needs.

When you compare Ewing car insurance, be sure to consider whether you want to insure under a tort or a no fault system, whether you want basic coverage or standard New Jersey vehicle coverage and whether you want to keep the mandatory limits or go for extra coverage.

No matter what system your state requires - no - fault or tort - you can save money on your car insurance by keeping a clean driving record.

The state of Texas uses the tort system for its Lincoln car insurance mandates.

Idahoans are held to a Tort system meaning someone must be found to be at fault for causing the accident, and in turn, that person and his or her car insurance company will be responsible for all damages accrued from the accident.

Hinesville and the rest of Georgia work under a tort system when it comes to car insurance.

Making Sure You Have Adequate Murrieta Insurance California operates under a tort system, meaning drivers must have a minimum amount of liability insurance to cover medical and property damage costs to the other car if they are atInsurance California operates under a tort system, meaning drivers must have a minimum amount of liability insurance to cover medical and property damage costs to the other car if they are atinsurance to cover medical and property damage costs to the other car if they are at - fault.

Illinois is a tort system state meaning they hold whichever driver responsible for causing the accident, financially responsible so his or her Urbana car insurance policy will be charged.

Colorado car insurance now operates as a tort system, meaning that fault must be established before an insurance company will pay a claim.

Missouri follows a tort system for car insurance, meaning that fault is assigned in an accident, so liability coverage is required:

Louisiana is a state that follows the Tort system for car insurance.

Alberta has a tort system (or «at - fault» insurance approach) for bodily injury and car damage liability but uses «no - fault» approach to accident benefits coverage.

There are several differences in car insurance across Canada: First, provinces use different insurance systems, either no - fault or tort (which is at - fault) or a mix of both.