Sentences with phrase «tort claim cases»

Not exact matches

In no case shall Slickster Magazine, our directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, interns, suppliers, service providers or licensors be liable for any injury, loss, claim, or any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special, or consequential damages of any kind, including, without limitation lost profits, lost revenue, lost savings, loss of data, replacement costs, or any similar damages, whether based in contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, arising from your use of any of the service or any products procured using the service, or for any other claim related in any way to your use of the service or any product, including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the service or any content (or product) posted, transmitted, or otherwise made available via the service, even if advised of their possibility.

A «CLAIM» IS ANY CASE, CONTROVERSY, DISPUTE, TORT, DISAGREEMENT, LAWSUIT, LEGAL ACTION, OR CLAIM NOW OR HEREAFTER PENDING BETWEEN YOU AND PyramidCreditRepair.com, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY ALLEGED STATE OF FEDERAL STATUTORY VIOLATION, OR ANY DISPUTE OVER THE INTERPRETATION OF THE WEBSITE TERMS OR THE ARBITRABILITY OF ANY CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE WEBSITE TERMS.

In a country in which we are spending over $ 11 billion annually on health care for companion animals, lawyers are going to see more and more animal - related issues coming to them, from tort claims against veterinarians to landlord - tenant disputes to animal custody cases.

Brought on data protection and English tort claims, the case required a legal framework including 10 key elements that pulled from criminal, civil, English and European law.

Of over 62,000 commercial cases filed since 2009, 80 percent include a breach of contract claim and 57 percent include a business tort claim.

Even if claims against individual health care providers were likely to be successful, it should be added that tort law challenges to individual decision - makers may not be ideal from the perspective of patients with rare diseases as a group, as the individualized outcome in tort cases does not necessarily lead to the larger, policy change desired by many patients.

For example, in Colorado civil cases, some of the more common grounds for an award of attorneys» fees to a defending party are: (a) a two - sided contractual fee shifting term, (b) dismissal of the case before filing an answer for failure to state a claim when tort claims were asserted, (c) a determination that the suit was groundless, frivolous or vexatious, (d) violation of certain rules relating to disclosure of information to the other party, (e) a statutory fee shifting provision in the case of a claim based upon a statutorily created right which is present in some statutes but not others.

There may be laws that require a person initiating a claim to first file for an administrative remedy (as in the case of a tort under the Federal Tort Claims Atort under the Federal Tort Claims ATort Claims Act).

If you are unsure whether or not your case qualifies as an intentional tort, it's best to speak with a Tort Claims lawyer so you can fully understand your legal rights and what kinds of compensation you may be entitledtort, it's best to speak with a Tort Claims lawyer so you can fully understand your legal rights and what kinds of compensation you may be entitledTort Claims lawyer so you can fully understand your legal rights and what kinds of compensation you may be entitled to.

The Supreme Court combined these three cases and ruled that the United States was not liable for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act and prevented soldiers from filing similar claims in the fClaims Act and prevented soldiers from filing similar claims in the fclaims in the future.

John concentrates his practice in business litigation and has handled a variety of cases, including constitutional and state tort claims, unfair trade practice actions, class certification issues and divorce actions.

Gibson has also handled business disputes, toxic torts cases, legal malpractice cases, construction defect claims and class actions.

I understand that by settling now, my tort claim may now be of no value since even if my case «crossed the threshold», I would be required to give credit for weekly indemnity payments made by the accident benefit insurer.

The case involved issues as to the interpretation of DIFC regulatory law and claims against the defendant bank in both contract and tort.

Defendants often have a legal team of top notch lawyers who are experts in tort law and well versed in all the ways needed to minimize or deny the settlement claims in personal injury cases.

He has litigated, arbitrated and mediated cases involving banking (workouts, foreclosures, «lender liability,» and other aspects of loan enforcement and collection), real estate (developer disputes, landlord / tenant litigation, broker commission disputes, boundary disputes and adverse possession), partnerships and family - owned businesses (issues involving company control, buyouts and valuation), real estate finance (default resolution, servicing and lien priority, trust disputes and guardianships), intellectual property (prosecution and defense of cases involving trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents) and other matters involving various contract and business tort claims.

The city sought to dismiss the case, pointing to the plaintiff's tort claim notice, arguing that she explicitly said there were «no injuries.»

Under the facts of this case, the Indiana Supreme Court held that the plaintiff's notice was adequate because the Indiana Tort Claims Act does not reference specifying any particular type of damages; only that a claim may be brought.

Mr. Porada's experience includes complex breach of contract cases and business torts, as well as monopolization claims, oil and gas controversies, and insurance coverage disputes.

Self declared «tort reformists» use exaggerated headlines about these rare cases to malign the claims of innocent victims.

She has a wide range of experience representing clients in contractual disputes and business disputes in Texas, as well as in cases pending throughout the United States, involving product liability, including pharmaceutical product liability, commercial and creative contract negotiations and claims, wrongful death, toxic torts, mass torts, environmental exposures, technology matters, premises liability, deceptive trade practices, and warranty claims.

He specialises in high value domestic and cross-border disputes, including advising on commercial contract disputes, commercial fraud cases, warranty claims, tort claims and judicial reviews.

She has litigated cases involving Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the National Labor Relations Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, various state discrimination statutes, and common law and tort claims, such as retaliatory discharge, defamation, and breach of contract claims.

Arish has acted on a wide array of commercial disputes in the English Courts and in English seated arbitrations, including cases involving civil fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, complex contractual claims, negligence claims, economic torts, shareholder, joint venture, partnership and insolvency disputes and jurisdictional battles (amongst others).

During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.

The regulation sets the appropriate national law to be applied in cross-border cases (for example, parties in tort claim to live in different countries and tort has allegedly taken place in third country).

Among the 62,000 cases, the company said, 4 in 5 include a breach of contract claim, and 57 percent include a business tort claim.

The association sought to dismiss the claim on the basis that they were immune from suit under G.L. c 231, s. 85V, which specifically governs the tort liability of a nonprofit association conducting a sports program, and a Superior Court judge agreed and dismissed the case.

In other cases, the existence of a remedy may depend on whether there is a specific tort claims procedure in place, or which covers certain types of claims, such as those brought by casino patrons.

Tom has experience across a wide range of commercial cases, including disputes regarding contractual construction, duties under contracts and in tort, issues of quantum and substantial banking & finance and civil fraud claims.

These legal professionals share resources, coordinate case reviews and draw upon industry experts to meticulously examine and evaluate mass tort claims.

Our firm aims to minimize the costs and exposures associated with mass tort claims by evaluating cases early in the process and working with our clients to design legal strategies that resolve cases as promptly and economically as possible.

Dan McFadden represents clients in cases involving business torts, contract and insurance claims, and allegations of professional misconduct and malpractice.

Her practice includes antitrust, business torts, class action, consumer protection, constitutional, contracts, False Claims Act, securities, trade secrets and other cases.

Some examples of cases where tort claims may be made include motor vehicle accidents where the driver of the other vehicle or the driver of the car where you were the passenger was negligent, workplace accidents, and slip and fall incidents.

If you've been involved in an accident of any kind that resulted in a personal injury, knowing the basics of tort claims may be important to you and your case.

When it comes to motor vehicle cases, some lawyers will handle only the tort action or only the accident benefits claim, not both, but they fail to put this limited retainer into writing.

The wrongful death claim may be an intentional tort, which could be filed in the case of murder, or a negligence tort, which could follow a fatal collision.

In 2005, led by personal injury attorney Deborah J. Gander, the firm obtained the largest amount ever awarded in a Federal Tort Claims Act case.

The attorneys at our firm have also represented clients in a variety of other class action cases, ranging from mass tort litigation, including asbestos claims, to pharmaceutical and medical devices.

In a post on this site last November, «Why the new s. 258.3 (8.1) of the Insurance Act will retroactively scale back prejudgment interest rates in MVA actions,» I stated that the statutory amendment reducing the rate of prejudgment interest for non-pecuniary damage awards (damages for pain and suffering and the non-pecuniary portion of dependent family claims) in automobile tort cases must be applied retroactively.

The litigation lawyers at Colson Hicks Eidson have decades of experience handling Federal Tort Claims Act cases.

David is generally instructed in high profile and heavyweight cases in the High Court, frequently involving conspiracy and economic torts, unlawful competition, team moves, the protection of confidential information, post-termination restraints, wrongful termination / expulsion, carried interest and bonus disputes (where he has acted in most of the landmark decisions such as Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald, Keen v Commerzbank and Anar v Dresdner Kleinwort), as well as claims arising in a regulatory context which raise important reputational issues, and whistleblowing and discrimination claims in the Employment Tribunal.

In addition to the largest award for its time ($ 60.8 million) in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, our law firm has handled many complex, high - profile claims involving brain injClaims Act case, our law firm has handled many complex, high - profile claims involving brain injclaims involving brain injuries.

Before talking with your lawyer, it can be helpful to know the difference between a tort claim and benefit claim so you fully understand what they have to say about your case.

Often victims of crime would seek a trial lawyer (i.e. someone who does plaintiff's tort claims) or general practice lawyer, who is familiar with the Internet to bring a tort claim against the perpetrator, to seek a TRO, or to assist of making a persuasive case to criminal prosecutors to press the case (a difficult thing to do).

In Wisconsin, the Supreme Court held in a 2001 case (Rabideau v. City of Racine 243 Wis. 2d 486, 627 N.W. 2d 795) that public policy precluded a pet owner's claim for emotional damages based upon the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress in connection with a negligent destruction of a companion dog.

Attorney John R. Orton successfully mediated in Federal Court (Western District of Wisconsin) the resolution of a personal injury case arising under the Federal Tort Claim Act.

He tries cases involving claims of medical malpractice, professional negligence, sexual molestation, product defect, property damage, major auto / truck accidents, premises liability, construction defect, labor law, environmental / toxic tort and defamation.

An experienced trial lawyer, he has pursued or defended numerous nine - and eight - figure cases, which includes obtaining a full defense jury verdict following a multi-month trial for an institutional client facing $ 100 million in contract and business tort claims.