Sentences with phrase «total change in terms»

Not exact matches

Even a small change in your mortgage rate could lower your monthly payment, and greatly reduce the total interest you pay during your loan term.

In percentage terms, 2014 is starting with fewer downgrades than in 2011 or 2012 (62.7 % and 60.0 % respectively vs. 59.2 % in 2014), but these years both had very quiet starts in terms of the total number of ratings changeIn percentage terms, 2014 is starting with fewer downgrades than in 2011 or 2012 (62.7 % and 60.0 % respectively vs. 59.2 % in 2014), but these years both had very quiet starts in terms of the total number of ratings changein 2011 or 2012 (62.7 % and 60.0 % respectively vs. 59.2 % in 2014), but these years both had very quiet starts in terms of the total number of ratings changein 2014), but these years both had very quiet starts in terms of the total number of ratings changein terms of the total number of ratings changes.

That changes things entirely, in terms of how much time he'd miss versus the total amount of time the Yankees could keep Chapman around.

Even if the spread had moved a few points, we likely wouldn't have seen any changes in terms of NCAA Title odds, SEC Title odds, Win Total OU, etc..

In terms of the total, the over has gone 7 - 6 since 2004 including four consecutive overs prior to the format change.

Long answer: Every country in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)(195 countries in total), plus the institution of the EU (the 196th member) agreed to the terms of the Paris Agreement - the UNFCCC can only pass agreements without objection,...

So what do these population figures mean in terms of which constituencies may, or may not, be likely to have their election boundaries changed following on the upcoming Consituency Commission report, especially given that this body effectively will have eight different options in terms of total Dail seat numbers to choose from?

Heart failure linked to temperature spikes Schneider and her collaborators published two studies this year, one in the journal Heart examining short - term temperature changes and heart health, and another paper published in Science of the Total Environment looking at how pollution and temperature influence health risk.

Although similar numbers of total splenic gp33 - LCMV — specific T cells were observed between genotypes (Fig. 5B), the distribution of gp33 - LCMV — specific CD8 + T cell effector and memory subsets were altered, such that there was a significantly lower percentage of short - term effector T cells and reciprocal changes in memory precursor cells among gp33 - specifc CD8 + T cells in WT relative to DKO mice (Fig. 5C), with a trend in changes in absolute cell numbers, consistent with temporal data from peripheral blood (Fig. 5A).

Long - term (decadal and multi-decadal) variation in total annual streamflow is largely influenced by quasi-cyclic changes in sea - surface temperatures and resulting climate conditions; the influence of climate warming on these patterns is uncertain.

By utilizing paired genome - wide high - throughput DNA sequencing (DNA - seq) with RNA - seq, we found that gene dosage, at the level of individual genes or chromosomal «somy» (a general term covering disomy, trisomy, tetrasomy, etc.), accounted for greater than 85 % of total gene expression variation in genes with a 2-fold or greater change in expression.

«When someone starts to exercise,» she says, «they might increase muscle mass as well, and therefore might be frustrated not to see too much change on the scale in terms of total weight.»

Furthermore, if we take into account total and HDL cholesterol, lauric and stearic acid both become better than carbs in terms of favorable changes in the body.

When we stratified our analysis by weight at baseline (normal weight [BMI < 25 kg / m2], overweight [BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg / m2], and obese [BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2]-RRB- the negative weight change associated with greater intake of fruits and vegetables was stronger among overweight individuals compared to normal - weight individuals (S10 Table, p - values for interaction terms between total fruit and BMI 0.03 in HPFS, 0.06 in NHS, and 0.09 in NHS II; p - values for interaction terms between total vegetable intake and BMI 0.03 in all three cohorts).

Dark chocolate consumption has also been suggested to have lipid modifying effects, decreasing total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and increasing high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.11 However, these changes have also only been explored in short term trials, lasting 2 - 18 weeks.

The total value of Internet sales by UK non-financial businesses employing 10 or more people in 2008 was # 222.9 b, up 36.6 % on 2007, which shows in economic terms the pace of this change.

Did some research, removed incorrect information, i still think its an unfair comparison with rolling resistance changing as well in terms of total contact patch (your article has a 40 mm difference between the largest and smallest set of tyres).

Ask whether additional fees would be assessed for these changes, and calculate how much they total in the long term.

In terms of market caps, which is the total valuation of companies based on their current share price and the total number of outstanding stocks, your allocation should rarely change at all.

The total return of a security, or in this case the index, refers to the gain or loss, in percentage terms, derived from both the price change as well as any income the investment pays over a specific time period.

I measure [Delta] LEVER as the historical change in the ratio of total long - term debt to average total assets, and view an increase (decrease) in financial leverage as a negative (positive) signal.

Keep in mind that reclassifications are not a change in the total amount of the payout, but adjustments of payouts into subcategories (like long - term capital gains or return of capital) or a change in the tax year of the distribution.

Ask the lender whether additional fees will be added for these changes, and calculate how much they will cost in total for the long term.

However, in order to do so in a way that will pay it off at or before the total repayment term (usually 10 to 20 years), the composition of each payment is changed, and typically now includes not only interest, but also a sizable bit of principal.

Altas is now effectively highly leveraged (in terms of total liabilities vs. total assets), so investors should be pretty wary of the potential NAV impact of even a small change in assumptions about its eventual asset / liability values.

Refinancing either to lower the monthly payment or change from a variable - rate to a fixed - rate loan could result in an increase in the total number of monthly payments and interest charges paid over the full term of the new loan.

In terms of power integrated over area, only northern Eurasia has a higher regional warming in absolute terms — which suggests to me that sea surface warming in the Arctic west of the Canadian archipelago might change the total sea energy balance by quite a biIn terms of power integrated over area, only northern Eurasia has a higher regional warming in absolute terms — which suggests to me that sea surface warming in the Arctic west of the Canadian archipelago might change the total sea energy balance by quite a biin absolute terms — which suggests to me that sea surface warming in the Arctic west of the Canadian archipelago might change the total sea energy balance by quite a biin the Arctic west of the Canadian archipelago might change the total sea energy balance by quite a bit.

As we discussed at the time, those results were used to conclude that the Earth System Sensitivity (the total response to a doubling of CO2 after the short and long - term feedbacks have kicked in) was around 9ºC — much larger than any previous estimate (which is ~ 4.5 ºC)-- and inferred that the committed climate change with constant concentrations was 3 - 7ºC (again much larger than any other estimate — most are around 0.5 - 1ºC).

Instead, to constrain the Charney sensitivity from the ice age cycle you need to specifically extract out those long term changes (in ice sheets, vegetation, sea level etc.) and then estimate the total radiative forcing including these changes as forcing, not responses.

Doubled - CO2 experiments indicate the total change to which we are «committed», in the long term, after raising GHG levels by this amount.

The short - term trend in total water storage adjusted over this 7 - year time span is positive and amounts to 80.6 15.7 km3 / yr (net water storage excess)... Expressed in terms of equivalent sea level, total water volume change over 2002 — 2009 leads to a small negative contribution to sea level of — 0.22 0.05 mm / yr.

Likewise, the head equation in your poster is also in terms of the total forcing and total temperature change, not forcing per year or temperature change per year.

During the solar minimum of 2008, the value of total solar irradiance at 1 AU (TSI) was more than 0.2 Wm - 2 lower than during the last minimum in 1996, indicating for the first time a directly observed long - term change.

The total uncertainty is much less than the long - term changes in climate during the last 150 years.

It seems that in terms of the total amount of energy coming from the sun there is only a very small variation due to the changing level of solar activity during a single cycle.

Many opponents of climate change policies argue that countries like the United States should not have to reduce their ghg emissions until China reduces its emissions by comparable amounts because China is now the largest emitter of all nations in terms of total tons, yet such an argument usually ignores the historical responsibility of countries like the United States which the following illustration reveals is more than twice as responsible for current elevated atmospheric ghg concentrations than China is.

From this, it should be sufficiently clear that, when viewed in absolute energy terms, the viable margin between life and death in the Earth's biosphere is remarkably narrow — so much so that a seemingly insignificant 1 % to 2 % change in the total energy of the global environment will invariably result in serious disruption of the established infrastructure of life in the biosphere.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for 1990 at 39.4 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, suggesting that the Nigerian emissions may have represented approximately 0.09 % of the total in terms of CO2 and 0.76 % of the total in terms of methane, using the IPCCs 100 - year global warming potential for methane of 25.

Section 1 contains five subsections with results on 27 - day response of low - latitude ionosphere to solar extreme - ultraviolet (EUV) radiation, response to the recurrent geomagnetic storms, long - term trends in the upper atmosphere, latitudinal dependence of total electron content on EUV changes, and statistical analysis of ionospheric behavior during prolonged period of solar activity.

Response: Suggest you ask «If CO2 is the main cause of climate change, in ppercentage terms, how much CO2 is in the atmosphere when compared to all other gases in the air, and what proportion of this total CO2 amount is man - made?»

In terms of how I got the numbers, I integrated the rate of anthropogenic CO2 emission to measure the total CO2 emitted versus time, then compared it to the % change in concentration leveIn terms of how I got the numbers, I integrated the rate of anthropogenic CO2 emission to measure the total CO2 emitted versus time, then compared it to the % change in concentration levein concentration level.

In terms of emissions the A1B / A2 pathways are pretty close, but if you look at estimates of total radiative forcing change (e.g. from GISS) there is zero increase since 2000.

I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by people who imply they are smart, or at least smart enough to know more on this issue than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.

Therefore, changes in density N of total air are governed by hydrostatic equilibrium condition dp / dz = - ρ g = - NM g. Using the hydrostatic equilibrium and the ideal gas law you can easily express the reference term γ ∂ N / ∂ z via g and temperature.

«If climate change continues to happen at the rate it is, it will impact our business model and will impact what we can insure going forwards, so there is total consistency between our core business and what we do in terms of offsetting our own emissions»

RE: 4th Error -RCB- Poses an objection to the non-scientific term catastrophic [NOTE: Scientific «consensus» is often being used & / or implied in standard climate - change discourse - Yet Consensus is a Political Term - NOT a Scientific Term]- HOWEVER - When Jim Hansen, the IPCC & Al Gore, et - al - go from predicting 450 — 500 ppm CO2 to 800 — 1000ppm by the end of the 21st century -LCB- said to the be highest atmospheric CO2 content in 20 — 30 Million YRS -RCB-; — & estimates for aver global temps by 21st century's end go from 2 * C to 6 * C to 10 * C; — & increased sea level estimates go from 10 - 20 cm to 50 - 60 cm to 1M — 2M -LCB- which would totally submerge the Maldives & partially so Bangladesh -RCB-; — predictions of the total melting of the Himalayan Ice caps by 2050, near total melting of Greenland's ice sheet & partial melting of Antarctica's ice sheet before the 21st century's end; — massive crop failures; — more intense & frequent hurricane -LCB- ala Katrina -RCB- for much longer seasonal durations, etc, etc, etc... — IMO That's Sounds pretty damned CATASTROPHIC toterm catastrophic [NOTE: Scientific «consensus» is often being used & / or implied in standard climate - change discourse - Yet Consensus is a Political Term - NOT a Scientific Term]- HOWEVER - When Jim Hansen, the IPCC & Al Gore, et - al - go from predicting 450 — 500 ppm CO2 to 800 — 1000ppm by the end of the 21st century -LCB- said to the be highest atmospheric CO2 content in 20 — 30 Million YRS -RCB-; — & estimates for aver global temps by 21st century's end go from 2 * C to 6 * C to 10 * C; — & increased sea level estimates go from 10 - 20 cm to 50 - 60 cm to 1M — 2M -LCB- which would totally submerge the Maldives & partially so Bangladesh -RCB-; — predictions of the total melting of the Himalayan Ice caps by 2050, near total melting of Greenland's ice sheet & partial melting of Antarctica's ice sheet before the 21st century's end; — massive crop failures; — more intense & frequent hurricane -LCB- ala Katrina -RCB- for much longer seasonal durations, etc, etc, etc... — IMO That's Sounds pretty damned CATASTROPHIC toTerm - NOT a Scientific Term]- HOWEVER - When Jim Hansen, the IPCC & Al Gore, et - al - go from predicting 450 — 500 ppm CO2 to 800 — 1000ppm by the end of the 21st century -LCB- said to the be highest atmospheric CO2 content in 20 — 30 Million YRS -RCB-; — & estimates for aver global temps by 21st century's end go from 2 * C to 6 * C to 10 * C; — & increased sea level estimates go from 10 - 20 cm to 50 - 60 cm to 1M — 2M -LCB- which would totally submerge the Maldives & partially so Bangladesh -RCB-; — predictions of the total melting of the Himalayan Ice caps by 2050, near total melting of Greenland's ice sheet & partial melting of Antarctica's ice sheet before the 21st century's end; — massive crop failures; — more intense & frequent hurricane -LCB- ala Katrina -RCB- for much longer seasonal durations, etc, etc, etc... — IMO That's Sounds pretty damned CATASTROPHIC toTerm]- HOWEVER - When Jim Hansen, the IPCC & Al Gore, et - al - go from predicting 450 — 500 ppm CO2 to 800 — 1000ppm by the end of the 21st century -LCB- said to the be highest atmospheric CO2 content in 20 — 30 Million YRS -RCB-; — & estimates for aver global temps by 21st century's end go from 2 * C to 6 * C to 10 * C; — & increased sea level estimates go from 10 - 20 cm to 50 - 60 cm to 1M — 2M -LCB- which would totally submerge the Maldives & partially so Bangladesh -RCB-; — predictions of the total melting of the Himalayan Ice caps by 2050, near total melting of Greenland's ice sheet & partial melting of Antarctica's ice sheet before the 21st century's end; — massive crop failures; — more intense & frequent hurricane -LCB- ala Katrina -RCB- for much longer seasonal durations, etc, etc, etc... — IMO That's Sounds pretty damned CATASTROPHIC to ME!

It also requires the added assumption that long - term changes in solar total radiation can exceed by two and a half times what has been observed in recent measurements from space.

We also show that the new dataset is consistent with long - term changes in total column water vapor over the tropical oceans, lending support to its long - term accuracy.

And the long term impact is, of course, a total and utter change in the dominant flora and fauna inhabiting the Earth, a probable major shift in plate tectonics, and a change in atmospheric chemistry that lasted at least several hundreds of years.

It is much better to think in terms of change in the total non-equilibrium system.