Figure 1 - Fraction of
the total human emissions (fossil fuel burning & land use change) that remain in the: a) atmosphere, b) land vegetation and soil, c) the oceans.
The budget is an upper limit on
total human emissions, from the beginning of the industrial revolution until the day we stop burning carbon.
«What Salby does not explain is this:
total human emissions of CO2 from fossil - fuel burning are far larger than total CO2 increase.
For example, a 10 % increase in plant photosynthesis alone would cancel out
the total human emissions.
Since 1958 the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 comes very close to an equally steady 40 % of what the CDIAC says
the total human emissions of CO2 come to.
The article said «However, while the volcano emitted roughly 2 × 106 metric tons SO2, annual emissions from cars were 30 x 106 tons (out of
a total human emission of ~ 131 × 106 tons).
Not exact matches
Exxon has argued against all the other shareholder proposals as well, including a «policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity»; a policy articulating Exxon's «respect for and commitment to the
human right to water»; «a report discussing possible long term risks to the company's finances and operations posed by the environmental, social and economic challenges associated with the oil sands»; a report of «known and potential environmental impacts» and «policy options» to address the impacts of the company's «fracturing operations»; a report of recommendations on how Exxon can become an «environmentally sustainable energy company»; and adoption of «quantitative goals... for reducing
total greenhouse gas
emissions.»
Jacobson explains that
total anthropogenic, or
human - created, carbon dioxide
emissions, excluding biomass burning, now stand at more than 39 billion tons annually.
But while wildfires are estimated to contribute about 18 percent of the
total PM2.5
emissions in the U.S., many questions remain on how these
emissions will affect
human populations, including how overall air quality will be affected, how these levels will change under climate change, and which regions are to most likely to be impacted.
Currently, agriculture accounts for 10 - 12 percent of the
total human - caused greenhouse gas
emissions globally.
The researchers looked at a
total of 34 different global climate model outputs, encompassing different degrees of atmospheric sensitivity to greenhouse gases and different levels of
human emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
The carbon entity data allows for the differentiation between carbon
emissions, produced and marketed by each of the 90 major multi-national and state - owned coal, oil and gas companies (and their predecessors), and the
total human attribution on climate change impacts.
Forests and other land vegetation currently remove up to 30 percent of
human carbon dioxide
emissions from the atmosphere during photosynthesis, but thanks to this latest study, experts now know that we have tropical forests to thank for a great deal of this work - absorbing a whopping 1.4 billion metric tons of CO2 out of a
total total global absorption of 2.5 billion metric tons.
It shows the number of articles along the y - axis, the
total number of citations along the x-axis, color codes whether an individual is one of the «concerned signers» who signed any of 20 declarations affirming the mainstream view of
human impact on climate and the need to limit greenhouse
emissions, was one of the 619 contributing authors to IPCC AR4 wg1 (2007), «non-signer» who is one of the non-AR4-wg1 authors on climate who signed neither statement a statement of concern nor skepticism, or one of the 495 individuals who signed any of 16 declaration skeptical of mainstream climate science or of the need for GHG cuts.
By comparison,
total human greenhouse gas
emissions (including CO2) since 1750 amount to some 350 billion tons.
«Unfortunately, if we add up
human emissions from the pre-industrial age to the present, then around 2000 gigatonnes out of the 5000
total have already been released into the atmosphere — so the situation is worrying,» explains Finnish Meteorological Institute researcher Antti - Ilari Partanen, who is currently carrying out research at Concordia University and was involved in the study.
Agriculture and land use change contributed about 1/3 of
total human greenhouse gas
emissions in the past decade, through crop cultivation, animal production, and deforestation.
The thing though with these low - sulfur fuels, the study also found, is that while they do reduce
total particle
emissions, the particles that do remain tend to remain in the air longer... Which is where they post a threat to
human health and affect climate.
You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand his very clear explanation of what he means by it --(a) large enough positive feedback (s) that it (or they) exceeds the
total amount of CO2 equivalent of all
human ghg
emissions.
The earth is not a greenhouse and the IPCC itself says that
human contribution to CO2 levels amount to 4 % of the
total from all
emissions.
For this reason, even a
total cessation of anthropogenic
emissions would result in almost no significant temperature reduction for centuries, which is why I used the term «irreversible on
human timescales» to describe the effect.
In addition to the plots of temperature segements, the chart includes dark grey columns representing the
total of
human CO2
emissions (gigatons) prior to the event, and then subsequent to the Super El Niño.
For policy - makers, the speed of climate change over the coming decades matters as much as the
total long - term change, since this rate of change will determine whether
human societies and natural ecosystems will be able to adapt fast enough to survive.New results indicate a warming rate of about 2.5 C per century over the coming decades (assuming no attempt is made to reduce GHG
emissions).
Thus
human emissions increase the
total CO2 content of the atmosphere, no matter if the emitted molecules are captured in other reservoirs (oceans, biosphere) sooner or later...
To better determine the fate of the species in the face of climate change, the researchers analyzed a
total of 34 different global climate models, taking into account atmospheric sensitivity to greenhouse gases and different levels of
human greenhouse gas
emissions.
It ignores two real physical constraints on
human CO2
emissions (plus resulting warming) in the future: — changes in
human population growth rates —
total carbon contained in remaining fossil fuel reserves
Assuming that
human CO2
emissions are going to continue at the same exponential rate we have seen in the past would get us to 1040 ppmv (Vaughan Pratt's Figure 7), a level that is most likely not even possible to reach because of the constraint in
total fossil fuel availability).
The fact is however that
human emissions today are less than 4 % of
total CO2
emissions, the remaining 96 % + being natural
emissions from the biosphere.
I am also troubled that the discussion of climate change is so focused on carbon
emissions instead of understanding the impact of the
total human footprint.
Human - caused
emissions of (CO2) constitute a very minor part of
total CO2
emissions, which have been shown not to have significant effects on temperatures.
«We estimate that black carbon, with a
total climate forcing of +1.1 W m − 2, is the second most important
human emission in terms of its climate forcing in the present - day atmosphere; only carbon dioxide is estimated to have a greater forcing.»
Again, as a hard sceptic, I would agree that maybe a quarter was due to
human CO2
emissions (remember, nearly half of the
total warming had occurred by 1945).
CDIAC data tell us that the global
human CO2
emissions from 1998 through 2012 were around 430 GtCO2, roughly 31 % of the
TOTAL cumulated
human CO2
emissions of 1380 GtCO2.
Thus all three variables: yearly
human emissions, increase in the atmosphere and sink capacity increased linearly over time, leading to exponential increases of
total emissions,
total increase in the atmosphere and
total sinks over the whole period.
But the
total yearly absorption is only halve the amount of
human emissions.
As has been discussed at this site previously, no matter how much people (or certain climate scientists) fear additional atmospheric CO2,
humans are not going to lower their
total emissions for several decades.
The current
total of 300 GtC
human emissions adds less than 1 % to the carbon reservoir in the deep oceans, and ultimately that is all what returns if everything is back in equilibrium.
The immediate comparison to be made is with Tom Qurik's graph above which is not differenced but simply plots the yearly values of
human emissions [ACO2] against annual variations in
total atmospheric CO2 [TACO2].
Yet according to official climate models, even if the U.S. enacted an immediate and
total ban on all
human emissions of greenhouse gases, the difference in global temperature by the year 2050 would be a mere five one - hundredths of a degree Celsius.
An upper limit that could ever be reached (assuming the increase is caused by
human emissions) would seem to be based on the
total amount of fossil fuels remaining on our planet.
Do the fit yourself, all you need are the
total levels of atmospheric carbon (about 750 Gt in 2006) and the
human emissions since 1750 and fit the line shape of Keelings curves using as many boxes as you want.
In Part 1 we established that the «
total never to be exceeded» atmospheric CO2 level from
human emissions is 1,065 ppmv, and that this level is projected to occur 150 to 200 years from today.
Total anthropogenic GHG
emissions were the highest in
human history from 2000 to 2010 and reached 49 (± 4.5) GtCO2eq / yr in 2010.»
The region locks up more than 100 billion tons of carbon — more than 11 years» worth of
total greenhouse gas
emissions from
human activities; plays an important role in global weather circulation patterns, including delivering rainfall to Central America, the United States, and southern South America; supports perhaps a third of terrestrial biodiversity; and is home to the bulk of the world's remaining indigenous people still living in traditional ways.
This year's temperatures now appear set to exceed 1998's values by around 0.35 C — or about one - third of the entire warming
total seen since large - scale
human greenhouse gas
emissions began during the late 19th century.
If the slight cooling trend continues for another few more years (say to a
total of 20 + years) despite unabated
human GHG
emissions, we will have falsified the CAGW hypothesis of IPCC.
But the sector is also responsible for the
emissions that come from the use of their products — in
total, around 44 percent emitted by
human activity in the United States.
The carbon entity data allows for the differentiation between carbon
emissions, produced and marketed by each of the 90 major multi-national and state - owned coal, oil and gas companies (and their predecessors), and the
total human attribution on climate change impacts.
Concentration numbers are pretty accurate, but we really do not know what percentage of the
total is from
human emissions.
Of the world's
total carbon dioxide
emissions only a small fraction comes from the activities of
human beings, but it is that small fraction that might threaten the equilibrium between the much greater flows.