You seem to indicate their's smart money on illinois, alabama and baylor, yet the percentage of
total money wagered vs ticket percentage is higher on all 3 of the opponents at William Hill.What do you make of this?
Not exact matches
This reverse line movement can easily be explained by our
money percentages, which indicate that Illinois has received 67 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Auburn is actually receiving 78 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This two - point line move can also be explained by our
money percentages, which show that Penn State is receiving 73 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This reverse line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Notre Dame is receiving 70 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Washington State is actually receiving 82 % of
total dollars
wagered.
In addition to our public betting percentages, we now offer real
money percentages, which reflect the percentage of
total dollars
wagered at one of the sharper offshore sportsbooks.
And at the time of publication, the ticket count on the
total was exactly even, but the majority of the
money wagered was on the under.
Surprisingly the Bears are a popular pick in terms of tickets and
money wagered at William Hill, and they're also a popular Over pick at CRIS in terms of their win
total.
It does look like sharp
money likes the Under though — the
total has dropped from 7.5 to 7 since opening, and 75 % of the
money wagered has come in on the Under.
We opened this with a
total of 45 and were flooded with over
money at a ratio of eight
wagers on the over for every one accepted on the under.
This can be explained by our
money percentages, which show that 75 % of
total dollars
wagered have taken the Bears as home favorites.
It's interesting to see that although the White Sox are receiving 62 % of tickets, they're only receiving 49 % of
total dollars
wagered according to our newly added
money percentages.
Since adding our
money percentages several months ago, we theorized that teams being ignored by most bettors but receiving a majority of
total dollars
wagered would be highly profitable.
This can easily be explained by our
money percentages, which show that 90 % of
total dollars
wagered have taken the under.
This line movement can be partially explained by our
money percentages, which show that New Mexico is actually receiving 96 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Illinois is receiving 66 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This can be explained by our
money percentages, which show that 76 % of
total dollars
wagered have backed the Lions.
Early public
money hammered the home favorite, with the Blue Devils receiving 80 % of spread bets and 88 % of
total dollars
wagered.
There's far less
money wagered on the
total than there is on the moneyline, but you can still extract value in games with extremely one - sided public betting.
This lack of line movement can likely be explained by our
money percentages, which indicate that Maryland has received 51 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Iowa State is receiving 82 % of
total dollars
wagered.
This reverse line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Mississippi State is receiving 62 % of
total dollars
wagered.
We display the percentage of
wagers and
money on the spread, moneyline and over / under, plus the
total number of bets placed on each sporting event.
That two - point swing can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Indiana is actually receiving 79 % of
total dollars
wagered.
We are also proud to announce that in addition to our public betting percentages, we now offer real
money percentages, which reflect the percentage of
total dollars
wagered at one of the sharper offshore sportsbooks.
This reverse line movement would indicate that even though more bettors are taking Team B, more
total dollars have been
wagered on Team A. Reverse line movement is a sure sign that smart
money, or large
wagers made by wise guys or betting syndicates, has come in on Team A.
These ticket percentages provide valuable information, but last January we started offering real
money percentages, which reflect the percentage of
total dollars
wagered.
62 % tickets on Carolina, 70 % of
total dollars
wagered on Seattle (Excellent indicator of sharp
money on Seattle)
The ticket and
money count are split very equally with 60 % of bettors taking LSU and 52 % of
total dollars
wagered on Florida.
A few months ago we added
money percentages to our site which allows us to track the
total amount of dollars
wagered at one of the largest offshore sportsbooks.
In addition to receiving 81 % of spread bets, the Panthers have received 76 % of
total dollars
wagered according to our newly added
money percentages.
Although we would prefer to see a higher percentage of
money wagered on the Chargers, it's encouraging to see that the Broncos are receiving a higher percentage of tickets than
total dollars.
This line movement can be easily explained by our
money percentages, which show that Kansas State is actually receiving 72 % of
total dollars
wagered.
It's also interesting to see that the betting trends at William Hill don't necessarily validate our sharp
money indicators, as the Packers are receiving 83 % of tickets and 82 % of
total dollars
wagered.
There's far less
money wagered on the
total than there is on the moneyline, but you can extract value in games with extremely one - sided public betting.
That's because the value derived from betting against the public is directly correlated with the volume of bets being placed, and there's roughly three times more
money wagered on the moneyline as opposed to the
total.
However, our
money percentages indicate that 85 % of
total dollars
wagered have backed the Rams.
In addition to receiving 72 % of spread bets, the Thunder have received 91 % of
total dollars
wagered according to our newly added
money percentages.
This can easily be explained by our
money percentages, which indicate the «Hawks are receiving 71 % of
total dollars
wagered.
Square Plays Analysis looks at the day's most lopsided games in terms of the
total amount of
money being
wagered on one team.
However, our
money percentages reveal that 56 % of dollars
wagered have actually taken the under, revealing why this
total has dropped from an opener of 153.5 down to 151.
Percentage of
Money Wagers vs. Percentage of
Total Bets
Consider also that the
total amount of
money wagered on bingo across New York in 1980 was $ 223 million.