Present - day mass redistribution increases
the total ocean mass and, on average, causes the ocean bottom to subside elastically.
Not exact matches
«The
total amount of water there is nearly the same as the
mass of all the world's
ocean water.»
The objective of our study was to quantify the consistency of near - global and regional integrals of
ocean heat content and steric sea level (from in situ temperature and salinity data),
total sea level (from satellite altimeter data) and
ocean mass (from satellite gravimetry data) from an Argo perspective.
That may be true on a
total mass basis, however, the comparison of the water
mass versus the
mass of only the top crust, that part that is visible for example, down a few kilometers, say to the depth of the deepest part of the
ocean — water would be a significantly higher proportion of the
mass than you have stipulated.
I would suggest that a new proxy for heat being stored (or lost) from the Earth climate system be developed based on
Total System Enthalpy, using a combination of moist enthalpy in the troposphere (after Pielke Sr.), ocean heat content, and total ice mass on the pl
Total System Enthalpy, using a combination of moist enthalpy in the troposphere (after Pielke Sr.),
ocean heat content, and
total ice mass on the pl
total ice
mass on the planet.
Sea level change - Sea level can change, both globally and locally, due to (i) changes in the shape of the
ocean basins, (ii) changes in the
total mass of water and (iii) changes in water density.
Because about halve the added CO2 as
mass remains in the atmosphere, the
total mass increases, which pushes more CO2 into the
oceans and vegetation.
I got a most probable value of 1.55 C / doubling, a 17 % to 83 % range of 1.41 C to 3.27 C / doubling, and a 5 % to 95 % range of 1.18 C to 6.2 C / doubling... not far from your values (but I assumed a little higher
total heat accumulation, including deep
ocean uptake equal to 10 % of the 0 - 2000M value, and some additonal heat for ice melt and land
mass warming).
-- If undersea volcanoes emit sufficient amounts of acids (in the enormous carbonate buffer
masses of the deep
oceans), then the pH of the
oceans could lower somewhat, but that would show up in a lower
total carbon (DIC: CO2 + - bi-carbonates) content of the
oceans as they release CO2 to the atmosphere.
The half life time of the accumulation in
mass of CO2 in the atmosphere is entirely different of the half life time of the accumulation in % in the atmosphere of the emissions, which is governed by the
total carbon cycles between air and
oceans / vegetation.
-- d13C / d14C levels don't prove that humans are the sole cause of the increase in the atmosphere, but they prove that the deep
oceans are not the cause of the increase... — I did use your Segalstad example to show the difference between accumulation in % (the red dye) and the accumulation is
mass (the extra inflow), all other variables being constant in
total result.