Not exact matches
CO2 emissions from the agricultural sector represent 21 - 25 percent
of total CO2 emissions, due to
fossil fuels used on farms, shifting patterns
of cultivation and chiefly, deforestation.
His calculations, based on 2008 figures for the concentration
of CO2 in the atmosphere, show that even assuming a lower estimate
of forest carbon content,
total and equivalent CO2 would level out at 476 parts per million, even if we stopped all
fossil fuel use immediately.
All too often, this fact is
used to suggest that the
total greenhouse gas emissions
of burping cows far outweighs the
total emissions from burning
fossil fuels.
The third is
total energy consumption and the
use of non-renewable energy sources (
fossil fuels) to drive our
total numbers and per capita consumption rates.
Category
of emissions Warming (°C)
Fossil fuel CO2 0.5 Land -
use CO2 0.25 Methane 0.25 Nitrous Oxide 0.09 Aerosols − 0.4
Total warming 0.7
, contributed 50 %
of the amount
of total GHGs / CO2 from
using fossil fuels for energy over that same period.
According to the CDIAC,
fossil fuel combustion plus cement manufacture have accounted for about 8.4 PgC / year, with Cement Manufacture representing about 4.5 %
of that
total, and recent land
use changes have accounted for about 0.9 PgC / year.
Obviously, the melting and recasting
of several thousand bottles required the
use of a lot
of fossil fuel; transport over the round trip
of several hundred kilometres to the bottle factory would add to the
total.
If the country's economy grows enough then the target could be hit, provided industry becomes more efficient in its
use of fossil fuel produced power, even if
total carbon emissions actually rise.
Given that humans are currently pulling 17 tW from the earth, as
fossil fuels, and
using another 30 tW for energy from food, our current needs are already a big proportion
of the
total «free energy» available.
Over the same time period, humans have consumed roughly 15 %
of ALL the
fossil fuel resources that WERE EVER on our planet (based on WEC estimates
of inferred possible
total fossil fuel resources today and CDIAC estimates
of fossil fuel use to date).
biomass the
total quantity
of living matter in a particular habitat; plant and organic waste materials
used as
fuel and feedstock in place
of fossil fuels
In the IRENA scenario,
total fossil fuel use in 2050 would be lower, standing at a third
of today's level, though oil demand would still be at 45 %
of today's level.
It turns out that the maximum temperature rise associated with future
fossil fuel use is only 0.8 °C, less than half
of the
total.
If you add that to the emissions, then the measured increase in the atmosphere is about 45 %
of the
total emissions (
fossil fuels + land
use changes), while without land
use changes the increase is about 55 %
of the emissions (
fossil fuels only).
Finally, we
use the in situ estimates
of CO2ff mole fraction to infer
total fossil fuel CO2 emissions from the Sacramento region,
using a mass balance approach.
Once one deducts the small amount
of oil and gas going into non-combustion end
uses, the inferred possible
total fossil fuel resources on this planet represent 2,873 Gt
of carbon, which would generate 10,536 Gt CO2 when combusted.
Does your model fit not only Mauna Loa but Law Dome as well
using as input only
total annual emissions
of CO2 from
fossil fuel, cement production and land
use changes?
From these
total inferred
fossil fuel resources on our planet we can calculate the amount
of CO2 generated (deducting 20 - 25 %
of oil and gas
used for «non-combustion»
uses, such as petrochemicals, fertilizers, etc.).
If the goal is to rapidly replace
fossil fuel use with wind, solar and hydropower, then the achievement
of the goal will take longer and be more expensive — and will likely result in a large cost in terms
of lives lost and
total environmental pollution.
Using one
of the IPCC's simpler climate models, Rutledge forecasts that
total CO2 emissions from
fossil fuel will be lower than any
of the IPCC scenarios.
In addition, I have shown you that the
total future GH warming from the principal GHG, CO2, is constrained by carbon content
of all remaining
fossil fuels on Earth to an absolute asymptotic maximum
of around 2C, which could theoretically occur in 200 to 300 years, in the unlikely event that all
fossil fuels get 100 %
used up by then
He will explain why conservation and even substantial reduction in our
total energy
use will be needed as we transition to solar and wind, in place
of fossil fuels.
The correct
total for CDIAC's estimate
of fossil fuel and land
use changes is only 41.5 GtC, not 75.45!
The red numbers and arrows show the additional fluxes caused by human activities averaged over 2000 - 2009, which include emissions due to the burning
of fossil fuels, cement production and land
use change (in
total about 9 PgC / year).
The report says that 83 percent
of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions consisted
of carbon dioxide from the
use of fossil fuels including coal, petroleum, and natural gas, while 8.6 percent consisted
of methane and 6.1 percent came from nitrous oxide.
Combining my previous method
of projecting
total fossil fuel use and the trends in Figure 3, I came up with this...
If you also include the value
of avoided
fossil fuel use in this calculation, the
total GHG abatement cost
of the whole system would come out even lower (i.e. around $ 10 / t CO2 - equivalent).
CFACT energy policy advisor Marita Noon reveals how Hillary Clinton has positioned herself on both sides
of the fracking issue — but her campaign for President emphasizes an end to all
uses of fossil fuels and a
total reliance on so - called «renewable» energy.
Figure 1 - Fraction
of the
total human emissions (
fossil fuel burning & land
use change) that remain in the: a) atmosphere, b) land vegetation and soil, c) the oceans.
The CO2 emissions from meeting this energy demand
using mainly
fossil fuels account for around 80 %
of total global emissions (IEA, 2006b).
For example, the global average effect
of any change in albedo from
using solar power would be rather small in comparison to mitigation
of climate change if that solar power is
used (to displace
fossil fuels) for a sufficient time period (example: if a 10 % efficient PV panel with zero albedo (reflectivity for solar (SW) radiation) covered ground with an albedo
of 25 — 30 %, the ratio
of total increased heating to electricity generation would be similar to that
of many
fuel - combusting or fission - powered power plants (setting aside inverter and grid efficiency, etc., but still it would be similar).
It shows
fuel shares
of total world energy supply, including the contribution
of fossil sources (oil, coal and gas), nuclear power (providing for about 16 %
of global electricity demand and 6.5 %
of all energy
use) and renewables (13 %
of total energy).
Thus, if we supplement considerably with solar, wind, water / tidal, some biofuels, etc... we will significantly improve the longevity
of fossil fuels we need while reducing their combustion by an amazing percentage
of total energy source
use.
The supply and demand model was
used to obtain future predictions for individual and
total fossil fuel productions for a number
of different scenarios, including CASE 1, CASE 2 and CASE 3 and STATIC, DYNAMIC and INDEPENDENTLY DYNAMIC supply and demand interaction options.
Although solar (mainly PV) is the largest single energy source by that time,
total carbon consumed through
fossil fuel use amounts to 800 billion tonnes carbon by the end
of the century, just a bit less than current proven reserves (900 billion tonnes as indicated above).
You will also find that «Electricity generators consumed 32 percent
of total U.S. energy
uses from
fossil fuels and emitted 40 percent
of the CO2 from
fossil fuel combustion in 2012.»
The utility operates eleven
fossil -
fuel generating plants, and
uses fossil fuels (mainly coal) to generate 80 - 85 percent
of its
total electrical output, with the bulk
of the remainder coming from nuclear power.