Maybe they should return to elite - run
totalitarianism regimes, which have suited them so well in the past.
Not exact matches
Mussolini may have modified Italian fascism, but the softening of its
totalitarianism did not necessarily mean a turn to democratic rule, as a myriad of exiles and opponents of the
regime revealed only too well.
In 2007, on the hundredth anniversary of Pius X's anti-Modernist encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Peter Steinfels used his column in the New York Times to suggest that the encyclical was a «revival of the battle against liberalism that the papacy and much of the church had been waging throughout the nineteenth century — and tragically the purge the encyclical started crippled those very elements in European Catholicism that might have resisted the Church's sympathy for authoritarian
regimes after World War I, when liberal parliamentary governments were besieged by rising
totalitarianism.»
Under the political
regimes of the political
totalitarianism and absolutism as well as colonialism and imperialism in the West, and ancient despotism and imperialism in the oriental civilizations, the people suffered severely and political sovereignty completely.
Lear's is a concrete court of 20th - century
totalitarianism — a high - Stalinist aesthetic — with the withering old dictator losing his iron grip not only on the
regime, but also his senses.
Wolf goes on to make a persuasive case that America came close to
totalitarianism under the Bush / Cheney
regime.
Right after the fall of the Communist
regime in Romania, Geta Brătescu declared Aesop a symbol of «everything that stood against
totalitarianism.»
But sure, this is a substandard form / degree of
totalitarianism relative to the mass murder byf
regimes in the USSR, China and Nazi Germany.