Sentences with phrase «totally erroneous»

«But it is totally erroneous to say that UV contributes to warming.

But, that does not give a pass to the totally erroneous proof that pi = 4.

That a few people make baseless claims is of zero value, when they can not justify these claims and when these claims lead to some strong results that are totally erroneous by contradicting very well j' known facts.

■ We have learned that the atmospheric CO2 levels as measured at Mauna Loa are totally erroneous — the mere product of a cottage industry of fabricating data by a father and then his son.

You screwed up the implementation of that very suitable filter, so any further reference to impulse response of F3 in that context is also totally erroneous.

Wagathon: We have learned that the atmospheric CO2 levels as measured at Mauna Loa — the site of an active volcano — are totally erroneous: the mere product of a cottage industry (a business of fabricating data that was passed on by a father to his son).

We have learned that the atmospheric CO2 levels as measured at Mauna Loa — the site of an active volcano — are totally erroneous: the mere product of a cottage industry (a business of fabricating data that was passed on by a father to his son).

My reading of the situation and of the works of the artists I want to talk about might be totally erroneous, or blurred by my own preoccupations, nevertheless.

What one person or even a vet says about a breed may be totally erroneous.

You can always dispute totally erroneous charges.

This is a totally erroneous statement and shows an obvious lack of information.

The study has a more serious message too: it's easy to be fooled into believing a plausible - looking habitat analysis, even when the data is totally erroneous.

Not exact matches

A lot of my skepticism on this subject comes from the fact that I read stuff in the papers back when I was playing that supposedly shed light on the mood in our locker room, but was totally made up and erroneous.

Your comments are erroneous, hysterical, sensationalist, ignorant and totally cruel.

But I do not go off and sulk, I simply point out where you have misrepresented me and continue calculating exactly how and why your claimed mK result is erroneous and totally unfounded.

The only thing they add is an explicitly erroneous equation that leads immediately to totally unphysical results.

Anyone old enough to have witnessed the flame wars in the late 80s and early 90s, as AOL newbies flooded the newsgroups (a precursor to the blogs of today) and totally misunderstood the oldtimer's online culture, would appreciate that jumping to conclusions on what an email is really saying leads to a high rate of erroneous conclusions (and starts yet another flame war, but that's another millienium ago now).