It was clear that the Yamal data differed from Hantemirov and Shiyatov because it produced
totally wrong results because the Hantemirov and Shiyatov data had no hockey stick shape.
Thus we have a totally unjustified equation out of nowhere and we get
totally wrong results.
I soon figured out what's the most likely nature of the error that may have led to such
totally wrong results, and then I found that they have, indeed, made an explicit error of exactly that nature.
Then we have a plurality of variable null hypotheses: «a wide null hypotheses may be modified», «split the null hypothesis into a large set of alternative hypotheses», «using one fixed null hypothesis for every step gives in this case
totally wrong results».
Not exact matches
Even though using binary signals sounds like a great idea, especially if you are
totally new to the trading market, it could be catastrophic
results if you go with the
wrong system.
Don't get me
wrong, I
totally get where you are going, however, MOST of those scientists «believed» in god because to not do so would
result in death..
Bourbon Black Forest Cupcakes may seem hard to put togeyher but you are
wrong, and the
result is
totally worth the efort.
Why would not you do this «objective» analysis by yourself and show us the
results, if you are so sure that the AMO camp is so
totally wrong?
Obviously, we can not guarantee
results or promise we'll cure you, no doctor ever should — that's
totally unethical and just plain
wrong.
Operating cost for electric cars is $ 0.50 to $ 0.75 per mile versus $ 0.10 for gasoline powered cars once battery replacement costs are included By 2020, Chinese PER CAPITA emissions will be higher than America's Does not believe that the 0.6 degree temperature rise to date is the West's «fault,» but does believe that China is the future problem Whatever U.S. does about emissions reduction and what people do as individuals is
totally trivial in face of the fact that China is adding huge amounts of coal fired generating capacity The most meaningful emissions reduction strategy today would be to convert China from coal to natural gas The claim that there are more frequent or more intense hurricanes and tornadoes as a
result of AGW is not scientifically supported We can reduce emissions, but it is important that we do the RIGHT things (and NOT the
WRONG ones) Not worried about «peak oil;» coal can be converted to liquid fuel
First I remind that
results obtained from the equations of the paper are empirically
totally wrong, and that the assumptions related to horizontal dependence are contradictory.
@PP: A paper is
totally wrong when it's main
results are empirically seriously
wrong and when those
results are consequences of an explicit error in the theory.
An outstanding example of someone getting it
totally wrong is the case of a prominent economist who wrote a submission to a parliamentary committee claiming that it would take more than 3000 years for a wind farm to «pay back» the carbon dioxide emissions
resulting from the manufacturing of the concrete used in the turbine's footings.
Only positive
results are acceptable and seen as successful, even if they're
totally wrong.