Not exact matches
And plenty of «no - excuses» charter
schools are known for their
tough discipline policies — which, yes, sometimes result in a high number of students leaving.
A get -
tough attitude prevailed among educators in the 1980s and 1990s, but research shows that zero - tolerance
policies don't make
schools safer and lead to disproportionate
discipline for students of color.
Restorative justice has replaced zero - tolerance
discipline policies in
schools around the country following evidence that
tough discipline in
schools sends primarily poor and minority students into the hands of the justice system.
Recently, Chicago's two major newspapers made it very clear that charter
schools can be very problematic and do not provide better academic results to justify additional millions of dollars that could be directed towards struggling neighborhood public
schools («Chicago's Noble charter
school network has
tough discipline policy; critics say too many students are being expelled,» Chicago Tribune, 4/7/14; «Charter
schools show little difference in
school performance,» Chicago Sun - Times, 4/7/14).
Recently, Chicago's two major newspapers made it very clear that charter
schools can be very problematic and do not provide better academic results to justify additional millions of dollars that could be directed towards struggling neighborhood public
schools («Chicago's Noble charter
school network has
tough discipline policy; critics say too many students are being expelled,»
High
school students and parents of color began to document the increasing use of a get -
tough approach to
discipline in
schools and coined the phrase «
school - to - prison pipeline» to describe the cycle of harsh
discipline and justice system involvement that they saw.8 These activists were soon joined by a small group of academics and civil rights advocates, who produced and disseminated research on the racially discriminatory impact of zero - tolerance
school disciplinary
policies on children.9