The corporation has been antagonistic
toward global warming science, and according to a new report (there's a PDF of the full report there) from the Union of Concerned Scientists, it has funneled nearly $ 16 million to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.
The corporation has been antagonistic
toward global warming science, and according to a new report (there's a PDF of the full report there)
Not exact matches
Journalists dealing with
global warming and similar issues would do well to focus on the points of deep consensus, generate stories containing voices that illuminate instead of confuse, convey the complex without putting readers (or editors) to sleep, and cast
science in its role as a signpost pointing
toward possible futures, not as a font of crystalline answers.
Climate
Science Watch: Climate Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate
Science Watch: Climate
Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate
Science Watch is a non-profit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate
science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate
science and related research in government policymaking,
toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by
global warming and climate change.
Gray's crusade against
global warming «hysteria» began in the early 1990s, when he saw enormous sums of federal research money going
toward computer modeling rather than his kind of
science, the old - fashioned stuff based on direct observation.
For instance, climate
science and climate politics have moved unexpectedly quickly
toward a broad understanding that we need to keep total human - caused
global warming as far as possible below 2 °C (3.6 °F)-- and ideally to no more than 1.5 °C.
A valuable post from Joanne Nova investigating the «monopolistic» funding of research into the
science of man - made
global warming, versus the non-existent resources directed
toward the study of natural climate change.
We consider his web site a prominent and monotonous source of misinformation and misrepresentation of the
science and physical evidence that relates to the human contribution
toward Climate Change, also called Anthropogenic
Global Warming or «AGW».
In a May 10, 2016, article, Almost Everything You Know About Climate Change Solutions Is Outdated, Part 1, Joe Romm says climate
science and climate politics have moved unexpectedly quickly
toward a broad understanding that we need to keep total human - caused
global warming as far as possible below 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F)-- and ideally to no more than 1.5 degrees C.