As the developed nations already have a financial set of problems, it should be relatively easy to manipulate some progress
towards less carbon dioxide production without trying to squeeze out false economic arguments.
Public policy can't make Texas more densely populated (in the short or even medium run) or cooler, but it could promote public transportation, increase gasoline and electricity prices, and shift electricity production
towards less carbon intensive alternatives to coal.
Carbon taxes like those suggested in the «Stern Report» to the UK Government, about $ 100 / metric tonne of carbon dioxide (equivalent to 88 US cents / gallon of gasoline and so on throughout the system) would accelerate whatever technology, economic forces, and lifestyle decisions might choose as paths
towards a less carbon intensive lifestyle.
Not exact matches
Commenting on the report, Professor Tim Benton of the University of Leeds said: «The biggest intervention people could make
towards reducing their
carbon footprints would not be to abandon cars, but to eat significantly
less red meat.»
The analysis clearly shows that the research is biased
towards countries that are wealthier, better educated, more stable and
less corrupt, emit the most
carbon, and are
less vulnerable to climate change.
We are in the race
towards a low -
carbon, prosperous and healthy future, being chased by a poorer and
less secure one.