In my post here on 19 September, I railed on about the fork in the road of advocacy — one towards mediation, the other
towards traditional court advocacy.
Not exact matches
From one direction,
traditional white banners hang from posts tipped with gold spheres, and photos of every past winner greet you as you walk up a brick path
towards the main
courts.
However, considering
traditional statutory interpretation in discerning Parliamentary intention was reluctant to go beyond the four corners of the document, the now ubiquitous use of Hansard to elucidate on such intention shows how far the
court has and can move from tradition
towards modernity.
The goal of these
courts is diversion of targeted offenders away from the
traditional criminal justice system and
towards clinical treatments and pro-social outcomes.
The Collaborative Law model removes the
court which is inherent in the
traditional model, offers support and legal expertise not present in the mediation model, and fully supports the concept of both parties working
towards a solution initiated by the do - it - yourself model.