It said «Scenario A assumes continued exponential trace gas growth, scenario B assumes a reduced linear linear (sic) growth of trace gases, and scenario C assumes a rapid curtailment of
trace gas emissions such that the net climate forcing ceases to increase after the year 2000»
Not exact matches
With
such emissions and temperature tendency, other
trace greenhouse
gases including methane and nitrous oxide would be expected to increase, adding to the effect of CO2.
The current approach that is generally pursued assumes essentially that past climate variability is indistinguishable from a stochastic red - noise process... Given
such a null hypothesis, the official consensus of IPCC (1995) tilts towards a global warming effect of recent
trace -
gas emissions, which exceeds the cooling effect of anthropogenic aerosol
emissions.»
But Kyllo was not followed by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Tessling, [2004] 3 SCR 432 where Justice Ian Binnie, writing for a unanimous court, at para. 51, agreed with Justice John Paul Stevens, speaking for the minority in Kyllo, that, ``...» public officials should not have to avert their senses or their equipment from detecting
emissions in the public domain
such as excessive heat,
traces of smoke, suspicious odors, odorless
gasses, airborne particulars, or radioactive
emissions, any of which could identify hazards to the community.»