Sentences with phrase «trace gases due»

That's precise enough to ensure detection of small increases in trace gases due to large, distributed sources such as cities.

Not exact matches

What they are attempting to sell you is runaway global warming due to a trace gas.

I also think you integrate over enough local / regional climate changes you can get an effect over a large area, but not global in reach and not due to a trace gas in the atmosphere.

The present warming is almost entirely due to increases in man - made greenhouse gases, mainly CO2 but also methane and other trace gases.

Change in spectrum from 1970 to 1996 due to trace greenhouse gases.

The following graph is the change in the earth's radiative spectrum from 1970 to 1996 due to trace GHG gases.

But that too could have been due to a trace gas.

Am I correct in assuming that for every external photon, coming or going, that contributes to the heating or cooling a local region of the atmosphere by interacting with CO2 molecules, there may be 60 to 100 other photons having that same effect by interacting with gaseous water, free H2O molecules, due to the relative abundance of these two trace gases in the atmosphere?

Spector Am I correct in assuming that for every external photon, coming or going, that contributes to the heating or cooling a local region of the atmosphere by interacting with CO2 molecules, there may be 60 to 100 other photons having that same effect by interacting with gaseous water, free H2O molecules, due to the relative abundance of these two trace gases in the atmosphere?

You seem to be arguing that this extra 33K is solely due to the behaviour of the trace greenhouse gases.

While stirring the small campfire looking over the nearly mile - high drop off Notch Peak I was dumbstruck thinking about the ignorance of something as mundane and consequential as station siting, over time, and the 1996 discovery of the PDO / AMDO could have possibly been misinterpreted by a supposedly scientific community as due to a trace gas which has merely paced normal abrupt climate change.

This absorption is due to trace gases which make up only a very small part of the atmosphere.

There are climate doomsday proponents and alleged «experts» who fear that Earth is warming so fast that it will soon reach hothouse Venus - like temperatures, primarily due to humans continuing global emissions of CO2, a trace greenhouse gas.

But it was cold this winter and C02 is plant food and only a trace gas and the greenhouse effect has been disproved anyway and even if the greenhouse effect does exist, C02 has negligible impact compared to water vapour and our only source of heat is the sun so it must be the sun, unless it is due to the C02 from volcanoes, but C02 follows warming so it can't be the C02 and the medieval warm period was warmer anyway and all the temperature reconstructions that show this not to be true are produced by corrupt scientists being paid by corrupt governments that have colluded to create an excuse to form a one world unelected social - ist government and even if the scientists are not that corrupt, although the e-mails prove they are, they have still got it wrong as the climate sensitivity is not as high as they think it is because it is basically the planets orbits and cosmic rays so we can say for a fact that the warming that probably does not exist is definatley not due to humans and even if it was the evidence is not sufficient to make drastic changes to the economy and increase taxes so that the politicians and scientists and business leaders get rich and leave us all poor — do they think we are stupid or something?