Sentences with phrase «trade between member states»

(f) does not constitute a barrier to or discrimination in trade between the Member States and does not distort competition between them;

The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market: all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal market, and in particular those which: (a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions; (b) limit or control production, markets, technical development, or investment; (c) share markets or sources of supply; (d) apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; (e) make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

Article 82 prohibits abuse of a dominant position by an undertaking (s) that may affect trade between member states.

This is in line with the Court's consistent jurisprudence that includes actual as well as potential effects, whether or on trade between Member States (or on the free movement of goods) in the scope of EU law.

[8] It is interesting to note as well, in this respect, that the GC found that the Commission should have given more indications as to how such a scheme would have conferred an advantage to the investors — and not to the shipyards or shipping companies — that would be liable to distort competition and to affect trade between Member States within the meaning of Article 107 TFUE (para. 200 of the judgment).

«[The] application to products from other Member States of national provisions restricting or prohibiting certain selling arrangements is not such as to hinder directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade between Member States within the meaning of the Dassonville judgment (Case 8/74 [1974] ECR 837), so long as those provisions apply to all relevant traders operating within the national territory and so long as they affect in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and of those from other Member States» (Keck, para. 16)(emphasis added).

Such measures shall be proportionate and may not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.

However, a measure, be it a grant, interest or tax relief, guarantee, government holding or the provision of goods and services on preferential terms, is characterised as State aid when it is the result of an intervention by the State, leading to a possible distortion of competition and one which is likely to affect trade between Member States.

He also concludes, after recalling the basic principles stemming from the relevant case law, that the supply obligation is likely to distort competition and affect trade between Member States.

This creates an incentive for horse - trading between the member states.

Not exact matches

The organization's primary function is to promote cultural, strategic and trade alliances between the member states and has been expanding its focus over recent years to touch more on trade and politics.

The first two rounds of talks between the United States, Canada and Mexico — the member countries of the North American Free Trade Agreement — on reforming the agreement have so far been relatively uneventful, even if they are still at an early stage.

Trade group Specialised Nutrition Europe (SNE) says the objections could derail the result of two years of «intense discussions» between the European Commission, members state experts and stakeholders.

An unusual bipartisan coalition of 19 of New York's 27 House members came together in opposition to the Trans - Pacific Partnership, a trade deal between the U.S. and 11 Pacific Rim countries, saying the agreement would destroy manufacturing jobs in the state just like earlier trade deals did.

This agreement should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services between Britain and the EU's member states.

President Akufo - Addo and Jeremy Corbyn also discussed issues bordering on the deepening of democracy amongst member states of the Commonwealth, the worsening humanitarian crises in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Syria, United Nations Reforms, in particular reform of the UN Security Council, BREXIT, an increase in trade co-operation between Ghana and the UK, and migration.

Member states will allocate emissions credits, much like was done in the European Union's carbon trading program, and trade between one another.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

[1] BILL C - 30, An Act to implement the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union and its Member States and to provide for certain other measures (October 31, 2016); currently at Senate review stage; recent government commentators have suggested the Bill is expected to be passed by late Spring 2017 (per European Union Chamber of Commerce in Canada February 23, 2017 seminar in Toronto).

Comprehensive trade deals between the EU and other countries must be approved by all member states in the EU, judges at the European Court of Justice have ruled.

[1] Government of Canada, «Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada & the European Union and its Member States,» Section 6 (i), accessed online: < http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/jii-iic.aspx?lang=eng >.

The battle between the US and the EU is still being fought and the Article 29 Working Party (made up of member states» data protection agencies) are doggedly committed to protecting the personal data of EU citizens, even if this delays transatlantic trade.

Second, the Court has ruled in Achmea on a bilateral investment agreement between two EU Member States and CETA is a Free Trade Agreement between the EU and all 28 Member States as one party and a third country as the other.

Bill C - 30, An Act to implement the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union and its Member States, was introduced on Oct. 31.