The
application which was made by the author's estate in respect of the
trade mark registration described the yell as «consisting of five distinct phases, namely sustain, followed by ululation, followed by sustain, but at a higher frequency, followed by ululation, followed by sustain and the starting frequency».
Specifically, the firm took issue with
Trade Mark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1 Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 y
Trade Mark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1 Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ye
Mark Direct's website claiming that it was the «UK's No. 1
Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 y
Trade Mark Service», «the UK's leading trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ye
Mark Service», «the UK's leading
trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 y
trade mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site which stated: «We file and register more UK trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ye
mark advice and registration company» and «the no. 1 firm in the UK», as well as a statement on the site
which stated: «We file and register more UK
trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 y
trade mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 ye
mark applications than any other firm as we have done in each of the last 3 years.
We've been gathering data for our very own inhouse database of
trade mark applications filed with Russian Patent Office, and while doing manual double checking of all entries for consistency, I've been making notes of
trade marks which catched my attention — these being mostly by foreign applicants and attempts to infringe on well known -LSB-...]