Sentences with phrase «trade publishers because»

I believe this is an existential challenge facing general trade publishers because it relates directly to the value publishers deliver authors and readers.

Some have even been cherry picked by trade publishers because of their success.

You can afford to sell for a bit less than a trade publisher because you control the costs.

Not exact matches

US based publishers have been unable to market their textbooks and print books to the Philippines because of sanctions imposed by the United States Trade Representatives 301 Report.

The publishers will have to adjust again, like they have done so many times before (paperback / trade paperback, ebooks as we speak, the printing press) but they are well placed to slide in because, after all, they have the lion's share of personnel, technologies and connections to have their work placed in the higher echelons.

The bottom line is that Amazon's eBook market is not yet big enough to cover the losses the top selling indie / self - pubbed authors lose out on by not being widely distributed in physical book stores in the U.S. Of course, this disadvantage is mitigated over time because once the trade publishers stop pushing their new releases, these books» sales typically decline, but indie / self - pubbed authors can keep their market pushes going indefinitely, and they can publish new books more frequently than once a year.

Because when I think about what other thing of value that libraries have that could potentially be traded to publishers in order to get an equivalent set of value back from them in the way of ebook rights, I keep coming back to one thing:

It's a trade - off, because traditional publishers offer great things as well.

From what I've heard from textbook publishers, digital editions are NOT going to be cheaper than print counterparts (unlike with trade books, for example) because the high cost of the textbook is supposedly in the paying of the authors.

The filing says that big - six publishers, through their contracts with Amazon that allow for Amazon's proprietary DRM on their ebooks, «unreasonably restrain trade and commerce in the market for ebooks» in violation of the Sherman Act,» and claims «consumers have been injured because they have been deprived of choice and also denied the benefits of innovation and competition resulting from the foreclosure of independent brick - and - mortar bookstores.»

As self - published books took off and began commanding a growing share of the book trade every quarter, publishers were able to weather the storm mostly because of increased profitability as more of their business moved to Amazon.

He talks of going to the major trade shows — Frankfurt Book Fair, London Book Fair, BookExpo America — and not taking a booth or stand because he and Elcock had to stay on the move, handling up to 16 meetings per day, trying to talk publishers into signing on to the BitLit concept and providing ebooks.

The publisher I chose was perfect because they produce titles for the trade, educational, and scientific markets.

But this also means I'll be forgoing the traditional distribution relationship because traditional publishers also have sales reps who would be preselling my books into trade accounts.

ePub is currently tipped to be the next big ebook format, if only because it's backed by a loose consortium of publishers, writers, and programmers, who are tied together in the IDPF, or what is known as a «stardards and trade organization for the digital publishing industry».

Even so you can follow the logic through from April 2013 until today, in many ways that makes sense because the impact of the kind of policies highlighted here would be more dramatic on publishers in the key Christmas Trading period than at any other time:

He was close to tears because he published with one of the biggest vanity publishers in India, and it was associated with one of the biggest trade publishing companies.

*** I have advised the publishers that they may proceed against you through the Federal Trade Commission in Washington calling upon you to there defend yourself against the charge of «unfair competition,» because of your simulation of their title, or that they can proceed against you, the producers of your film, its distributors and exhibitors in court for an injunction restraining you from use of the title, «The Illiterate Digest.»