Sentences with phrase «trade secret misappropriation as»

Morgan identified data security and privacy, government investigations, counterfeit merchandise, design patents, and trade secret misappropriation as hot - spots for 2013.

Not exact matches

In addition, Mr. Morley filed a subsequent lawsuit containing allegations that the formation of Square and the development of our card reader and decoding technologies constituted, among other things, breach of an alleged oral joint venture, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as other related claims.

A video of Kalanick aggressively berating one of his own drivers swiftly followed, as did a lawsuit from Google driverless car sister company Waymo for trade - secret misappropriation.

By submitting User Materials to or using the Site, you represent that you have the full legal right to provide the User Materials, that such User Materials will not: (a) divulge any protected health information or infringe any intellectual property rights of any person or entity or any rights of publicity, personality, or privacy of any person or entity, including without limitation as a result of your failure to obtain consent to post personally identifying or otherwise private information about a person or which impersonates another person; (b) violate any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; (c) be defamatory, libelous or trade libelous, unlawfully threatening, or unlawfully harassing or embarrassing; (d) be obscene, child pornographic, or indecent; (e) violate any community or Internet standard; (f) contain any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, or other computer programming routines that damage, detrimentally interfere with, surreptitiously intercept, or expropriate any system, data or personal information, or that facilitate or enable such or that are intended to do any of the foregoing; (g) result in product liability, tort, breach of contract, personal injury, death, or property damage; (h) constitute misappropriation of any trade secret or know - how; or (i) constitute disclosure of any confidential information owned by any third party.

The suit seeks compensatory, punitive, and other damages as well as royalties for the misappropriation of trade secrets.

The misappropriation of trade secrets occurs when trade secrets are acquired through breach of a confidential relationship or by other improper means, such as theft, wiretapping, or even espionage.

The Houston and Dallas attorneys at Deans & Lyons, LLP have handled lawsuits involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in federal and state courts as well as before arbitration panels.

As lawyers who have handled extensive lawsuits involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets (at both the state and federal level), our legal team stands ready to handle your case.

Ms. Michaud's litigation and arbitration practice primarily includes cross-border contract and business torts disputes, consumer class actions (state and federal statutory violations and data privacy concerns), intellectual property disputes, trade secret misappropriation, competition, as well as other statutory and common law claims.

He has extensive experience navigating and litigating disputes alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and violations of restrictive covenants by former employees and competitors, as well as claims of patent infringement, false advertising and other acts of unfair competition.

In addition to RICO violations, the suit claims violations of laws barring computer hacking and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as the tort of trespass.

Our team handles all types of intellectual property disputes, including cases involving patent and trademark infringement, as well as lawsuits involving the misappropriation of trade secrets.

Attorney McGuigan began his career as a private investigator and conducted investigations into trade secret misappropriation cases across the United States, and most notably a case involving the theft of trade secrets in Mexico City.

J. Christopher Fox, II (Business Litigation)-- Fox is a partner whose practice encompasses a broad range of commercial disputes, including contractual issues arising in the financial services arena, matters relating to restrictive covenants and unfair competition claims, and litigation of patent and trademark infringement claims, as well as defense and prosecution of claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

The UTSA, enacted in almost the entire U.S., except for the states of New York, North Carolina, and Massachusetts, is designed to protect trade secrets from misappropriation by enabling injunctive relief and damages against parties that obtained your idea through improper means, such as espionage or theft.

John has represented and currently represents Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Taiwanese companies in litigation, particularly patent and trade secret misappropriation cases, such as HTC, Goodix, ASUS, SK Hynix, and Largan Precision, as well as U.S. companies such as Verizon, Monolithic Power Systems, T - Mobile, Intel and Microsoft.

For this reason, a party seeking judicial relief for the misappropriation of trade secrets needs to consider differences in statutes of limitation, attorney's fees and other available damage relief and make a decision as to whether to file suit in state or federal court.

Business tort claims include legal disputes focused on misappropriation of trade secrets, for instance, as well as conversion of property, negligent misrepresentation of facts, and tortious interference with contract or business relationships.

As a litigator she handles cases involving trademark and copyright infringement, domain names, trade secret misappropriation, right of publicity, defamation, and commercial disputes.

In the past ten years, Mr. Altieri has both brought and defended numerous actions on behalf of employers, including several injunctive proceedings annually, on such issues as misappropriation of trade secrets, non-compete agreements, and breach of fiduciary duty.

Obtained judgment on the pleadings as to the trade secret misappropriation and declaratory judgment counterclaims.

Some of our notable entertainment and media attorneys are: John Quinn, General Counsel of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who has also represented entertainment and media clients in a number of high profile cases; Kathleen Sullivan, the former Dean of Stanford Law School, First Amendment scholar, and nationally renowned appellate advocate, who heads the firm's appellate practice group; Bob Raskopf, an expert in the sports, entertainment and media bars in New York, who is perhaps best known for his work on behalf of professional sports leagues and teams, newspapers and publishers; Claude Stern, who has represented a broad array of leading software developers, videogame manufacturers, online publishers and other media clients in all forms of intellectual property litigation, including copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, and licensing disputes; Bruce Van Dalsem, who has tried and resolved disputes for studios, producers and performing artists in the film, television, music and finance businesses, securing a top five verdict in California based on the misappropriation of a film library; Gary Gans, an expert litigator in motion picture financing, production and distribution disputes, as well as copyright and idea theft cases, who has been named in 2012 by The Hollywood Reporter as one of America's «Top Entertainment Attorneys;» Jeff McFarland, who has litigated entertainment related cases for more than 20 years, including cases involving motion picture and television series profits, video game licenses, idea theft and the «seven year rule;» and Michael Williams, who represents a satellite exhibitor and other media clients in trademark, copyright, patent, antitrust and other commercial litigation.

Our lawyers have extensive knowledge of the issues at the heart of the entertainment and media businesses and have tried and arbitrated many high stakes cases involving claims in diverse, but sometimes related, areas such as breach of contract, copyright, trademark, idea theft, misappropriation of trade secrets, patent, right of publicity, defamation, free speech, and unfair competition.

HouseCanary has been awarded a $ 706.2 million jury verdict against Amrock, formerly known as Title Source, in a misappropriation of trade secret and breach of contract case, according to a release from Susman Godfrey LLP, the firm representing HouseCanary.

The court also found that the trial court had properly dismissed the misappropriation of trade secrets allegations, as the disclosure of the «Letter of Intent» by Nelson to Duemeland did not constitute misappropriation of a trade secret because there was no evidence that Duemeland had made any attempt to obtain the letter from Nelson.

Bertsch brought a lawsuit against Duemeland, alleging that his remarks to Nelson constituted defamation and also alleging tortious interference with a business relationship as well as misappropriation of trade secrets.