We represent clients in all aspects of intellectual property litigation,
including trade secret litigation, patent litigation, and copyright, trademark and false advertising litigation.
Defense judgment and award of attorneys» fees
in trade secret litigation involving alleged misappropriation of financial institution software product.
Previously with Nixon Peabody, Mungovan focuses on litigation involving private investment funds and fund sponsors, as well
as trade secrets litigation, government investigations, and other matters.
She also contributed to an English language handbook
on trade secret litigation in the United States created for the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China.
Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale
trade secret litigation lawyer who has extensive experience dealing with discovery issues and disputes, including the trade secret privilege.
The group handles the full range of patent, trademark, copyright and
trade secret litigation throughout the United States for large and small businesses, universities, and individuals.
Our team includes trial lawyers experienced in prosecuting and defending all types of intellectual property disputes, including patent, trademark, copyright and
trade secret litigation matters.
Companies in the U.S own an estimated $ 5 trillion in trade secerts and about $ 3 billion is lost due to theft every year The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 went into effect in May While it's still early to interpret how it will
affect trade secret litigation, some things are clear, especially that federal court dockets will see an incr......
Through our technical knowledge and litigation expertise in federal and state courts, the US International Trade Commission and national and international arbitration forums, we provide our clients with the right blend of talent for the modern era of high - stakes, high -
tech trade secrets litigation.
And when companies find themselves
facing trade secret litigation in federal or state courts, our deep bench of commercial, employment, and intellectual property litigators provide effective, forceful representation.
As technologies continue to evolve, the need for a more delicate adjudication model for
trade secret litigation became obvious, including the need for procedural solutions.
As a result, in addition to posts about recent and noteworthy legal decisions, this blog will also speak to practical litigation issues that frequently
accompany trade secret litigation, consider larger societal and technological trends that affect this area, and, finally and perhaps most importantly, speak to administrative and human resources issues that also arise in this context and that need to be considered to protect trade secrets.
Paul focuses on defense work for a variety of industries, including retail, technology, manufacturing, and transportation related to a wide range of employment disputes, including discrimination and harassment, independent contractors and the sharing economy, wrongful termination and whistleblower complaints, as well
as trade secret litigation.
He has represented clients in a variety of intellectual property matters, including patent, trademark and
trade secret litigation throughout the United States, as well as multijurisdictional matters.
While it's still early to interpret how it will
affect trade secret litigation, some things are clear, especially that federal court dockets will see an increase in more private trade secrets cases.
Substantial settlement in favor of a financial institution
in trade secret litigation involving misappropriation of computer source code by software developer.
Trade Secret Litigation: advise and represent plaintiffs across various industries seeking to protect proprietary information from competitors and former employees; represent defendants accused of trade secret misappropriation.
Concentrating on litigation, including business disputes, breach of contract actions, officer and director liability, securities litigation, professional liability,
trade secret litigation, elder abuse actions, and select personal injury matters.
Prosecuting and defending IP infringement claims, including trademark, copyright, patent (including patent trolls), and
trade secret litigation, in both State and Federal Courts throughout the United States and in front of the USPTO.
Mr. Howland was formerly a partner in the intellectual property practice at Jones Day, where he spent more than 15 years representing clients in patent and
trade secret litigation in federal courts around the country and before the International Trade Commission on matters involving: ◾ Semiconductor manufacturing ◾ Analog and digital circuits ◾ Microprocessor, memory, and network architectures ◾ Wireless communications ◾ Software ◾ Payment systems, encryption, and network security
As an IP and business litigation law firm,
our trade secret litigation attorneys can assist with advising on trade secret litigation legal issues.
Mr. Quarmby's practice covers a variety of areas, including general commercial, patent, trademark, and
trade secret litigation.
Zhu's recent representative litigation matters include representing a U.S. client in a patent enforcement action against several Germany - and China - based companies; representing a China - based company in computer software and
trade secret litigation in the U.S.; representing a U.S. company in a patent infringement and trade secret litigation matters in China; and representing a U.S. client in a patent infringement case in China against several companies in China.
Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale trade secret lawyer who represents businesses in
trade secret litigation.
Our global footprint, experience in many forums and expertise across a diverse array of technologies and industries position
our trade secrets litigation lawyers to handle the enforcement or defense of trade secrets claims of any stripe.
Our IP litigators frequently collaborate with Eversheds Sutherland colleagues in the employment litigation practice to provide comprehensive advice and representation in
trade secret litigation.
He is particularly experienced in intellectual property disputes involving copyright infringement, trademark infringement, unfair competition and
trade secret litigation, patent infringement and domain name disputes.
«News and updates on non-competition agreements, restrictive covenants, unfair competition, and
trade secret litigation in Delaware.»
Lisa focuses her practice in the area of complex commercial and business litigation, representing clients in state and federal courts in a variety of disputes, including Uniform Commercial Code litigation,
trade secret litigation, class action defense, business torts, unfair competition, false advertising and Lanham Act claims, breach of contract and promissory estoppel actions, product liability defense, title insurance policy and closing protection letter claims, and bankruptcy litigation.
He advises clients on patent litigation and
trade secret litigation, as well as general commercial litigation.
Zach Wolfe is a trial lawyer with over 20 years of experience in business litigation matters, focusing recently on non-compete and
trade secret litigation.
Within the civil and commercial litigation arena, we vigorously protect our clients» interests in business and corporate disputes, intellectual property and
trade secrets litigation, real estate disputes and other contentious matters.
«The Advantages of Using a Patent Litigation Specialist v. a General Trial Attorney in Patent and
Trade Secret Litigation»
Christian & Small's attorneys have tried, arbitrated, mediated and handled appeals of virtually every type of commercial dispute including contracts, business torts, securities, shareholder disputes, antitrust, intellectual property, and
trade secret litigation.
Our Charlottesville business litigation attorneys handle claims involving breach of contract,
trade secrets litigation, antitrust claims, intellectual property infringement claims, and business torts including civil conspiracy, fiduciary duty breaches, conversion, misappropriation of trade secrets, fraud, and tortious interference.