Acting on a motion for summary judgment filed by Hueston Hennigan, U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick held that although courts «sparingly grant summary judgment in
trademark cases because they are so fact - intensive,» the evidence here tilted so heavily in favor of the defendants as to make summary judgment appropriate.
Not exact matches
Oh, and in
case you were wondering, the
trademark «X» marking this bread didn't come about
because it was invented by straight edge warriors.
And Jones Day's selection of
trademark as the subject matter of its strike suit is no surprise,
because the biannual AIPLA economic survey has consistently shown that
trademark cases typically cost hundreds of thousands of dollars just to reach the summary judgment stage.
In
case the
trademark isn't approved
because it is already in use by some other company, I could just change it to Hoogas Woogas or something like that.
The same court had stayed a design rights - based
case against multiple Samsung phones
because of doubts that Apple's asserted Community designs would be upheld at the end of a revocation proceeding before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, an EU agency in charge of Community (= Eu - wide)
trademark and design registration.