The Navajo Nation sued the company in 2012 over
trademark violations for selling items such as the Navajo Hipster Panty.
Not exact matches
Filing a
trademark violation case
for using the world «Fortune» which they knew was owned by Time Magazine, and not them, was just a way to take advantage of the system by someone with more money that the poor defendant had.
Entrants agree to release and hold harmless the Bloggin» Mamas, Heather Lopez Enterprises, LLC, Florida Prepaid, Moore Communications, Twitter, and any other organizations responsible
for sponsoring, fulfilling, administering, advertising or promoting this giveaway, and their respective parent, subsidiaries, and affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors, members, employees, agents and subcontractors (collectively the «Released Parties») from and against any and all claims, expenses, and liability, including but not limited to negligence and damages of any kind to persons and property, including but not limited to invasion of privacy (under appropriation, intrusion, public disclosure of private facts, false light in the public eye or other legal theory), defamation, slander, libel,
violation of right of publicity, infringement of
trademark, copyright or other intellectual property rights, property damage, or death or personal injury arising out of or relating to a participant's entry, creation of an entry or submission of an entry, participation in this giveaway, acceptance or use or misuse of prize.
25.6.3 in any matter that involves any of the foregoing claims,
for resolution or decision of any question of fact or law required to resolve such claim, including, but not limited to, questions required to decide or rule with respect to the infringement, misappropriation, validity, enforceability or ownership of any copyright, patent, trade secret,
trademark, service mark or trade dress or with respect to any remedy or relief at law or in equity
for any such infringement or misappropriation or
for any
violation of such Sections 1201 and / or 1202.
Copying or downloading these materials (other than your own)
for anything other than your personal use is a
violation of these General Terms of Use and may be a
violation of copyright and
trademark laws.
They can also nix books
for things like copyright or
trademark violations, excessive use of brands (which they likely mean from outside the world in question), and «poor customer experience» (which means badly made ebooks, but could be broadly interpreted).
Without the prior written consent of the owner, modification of the materials, use of the materials on any other web site or networked computer environment, or use of the materials
for any purpose other than personal, non-commercial use is a
violation of the copyrights,
trademarks, and other proprietary rights, and is prohibited.
However, the report they filed had no evidence of a registry number or status
for its
trademark and the accusations of
trademark violation were proven to be spurious.
In the case of celebrities, the use of likeness without consent may be a
violation of
trademark rights, so if it doubt, it is a good idea to seek permission with a Release
for Use of Likeness.
One can't be arrested
for most copyright
violations, patent infringement,
trademark infringement, violating food labelling laws, failure of an agency to promulgate regulations in time, etc..
My guess is that an ISP and an app would be the same market
for trademark purposes and that there could be a
violation of
trademark claim filed.
Nobody is going to look
for copyright
violations or
trademark infringement on your behalf.
Mr. Kaplan has successfully represented various insurers in a multitude of complex coverage disputes, including disputes stemming from claims
for directors and officers liability, professional liability, environmental contamination, disparagement of competitor's products,
violation of false claims act statutes, construction defects,
trademark, copyright and patent infringement, and
violation of constitutional rights.
Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome
for a high - end beauty products company in a
trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank
for alleged
violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.
YESCO asserts claims
for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference with economic relationships, and
trademark in
violation of the Lanham Act.
So, from what you're saying, if I were to get tv shows from any public streaming web site, may it be legal or not, I won't be liable
for copyright infringement or
trademark violation?
Defending the Republic of Guyana and its state - owned sugar corporation in a lawsuit brought by U.S. and Canadian companies in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of New York over alleged
trademark violations and libel.
Modification of the materials or use of the materials
for any other purpose is a
violation of California Legal Research, Inc.'s copyright,
trademark, service mark, trade dress and other proprietary rights.
In case of
violation / infringement of any IPR such as
trademark infringement by any employee / representative or any third party infringing upon the IPR of the Company, the Compliance Team of the Company would first investigate the matter in association with its Advocates and make recommendations to the Director / CFO
for resolution of such
violation / infringement including need
for any legal course of action.
Modification or use of the Material or any other content on this Site
for any purpose not permitted by these Terms may be a
violation of the Copyrights and / or
Trademarks protected by law and these Terms and is prohibited.
The development company raised counterclaims
for cybersquatting,
trademark infringement, false designation, and
violation of the state consumer fraud law.
NAR received a $ 500,000 judgment from an Illinois federal court
for a website operator's willful
violations of NAR's
trademark rights.
Immediate Businesss Action Needed
for these Agents: - remember over 3.5 Million is at stake here folks -
trademark violations if you do or do not transfer to a new RE / MAX office - Small Claims court broker of record challenges against you - Small Claims court agent challenges against brokerage - Google SEO on your name and business - Your urls and email addresses - Termination cost or refunds from former brokerage - fraud if brokerage failed to forward your Remax ad or regional fees to head office - breach of independent contractor agreement over your rights to use the remax brand over the full term of your independent agreement - etc etc