Sentences with phrase «trades job results»

Were you looking for system - trades job results?

Not exact matches

A joint study estimated bilateral trade will increase by about 20 per cent, resulting in a $ 12 billion boost to the Canadian economy and the creation of about 80,000 new jobs.

A report put out by the Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (CITAC) found that about 200,000 Americans, in every U.S. state, lost their jobs in 2002 as a result of higher steel prices, representing some $ 4 billion in lost wages.

The Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition found that 200,000 workers in U.S. manufacturing lost their jobs as a result of the tariffs.

The OECD further suggests that a halving of trade barriers across the G20 would result in a 0.3 - to 3.3 - per - cent boost in jobs for low - skilled workers (the impact varies by country) and a 0.9 - to 3.9 - per - cent expansion in higher - skilled employment opportunities.

In particular, President Trump insisted that the free trade agreement caused millions of jobs to be sucked down to Mexico, resulting in a $ 63 billion trade deficit with the US's southern neighbor.

A report by a trade consulting firm released this month found that industries that consume a lot of steel and aluminum, including manufacturing and construction, could shed nearly 100,000 jobs as a result of the tariffs.

Canada is forecasting 25,000 new jobs by 2030 resulting from a free trade agreement with China, our second largest trading partner.

The resulting report suggested that a free trade agreement between Canada and China would increase Canadian exports by some $ 7.7 billion by 2030, supporting 25,000 new Canadian jobs.

Cohn believes that the tariffs could result in trade wars and cost more jobs than they save; while Navarro and others such as US Trade Rep. Robert Lighthizer and US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross think they could be an effective way to reduce the US trade deficit and revive beleaguered industtrade wars and cost more jobs than they save; while Navarro and others such as US Trade Rep. Robert Lighthizer and US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross think they could be an effective way to reduce the US trade deficit and revive beleaguered industTrade Rep. Robert Lighthizer and US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross think they could be an effective way to reduce the US trade deficit and revive beleaguered industtrade deficit and revive beleaguered industries.

This administration does care about the suffering that results for workers who lose their jobs and it does care about the weakening of environmental protection that is entailed in free trade.

At the time, the Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition found that 200,000 jobs had been lost as a result of the tariffs, a number that exceeded the total number of people working in steel manufacturing at the time.

We recognize current trade policies have failed and resulted in the export of our manufacturing job base which sustains America's middle class.

The result of that, he said ahead of a speech to the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) tonight, would be less trade, less economic growth and fewer jobs.

Since its founding, the Reform Party has fought against disastrous trade deals that result in the outsourcing of American jobs.

Opponents of the deal equate TPP with the North American Free Trade Agreement signed with Mexico and Canada in the 1990s, which resulted in the outsourcing of American jobs.

Due to my full - time job until recently I've been trading US stocks on weekly timeframe for obvious reasons with good results.

Readers who actually want a thorough and careful account of the pros and cons of I - 732 from a policy point of view should read the three detailed articles by the Sightline Institute here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/01/pros-cons-carbonwa-carbon-tax-swap-ballot-initiative-732/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/02/does-initiative-732-carbon-tax-have-a-budget-hole/ http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/03/weighing-critiques-of-carbonwa-i-732/ Readers who are interested in the messy political conflict over the initiative might start with a couple of Patrick Mazza's articles: http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/11/can-wa-state-climate-policy-train-wreck.html http://cascadiaplanet.blogspot.com/2015/12/wa-climate-initiative-conflict-on-road.html If you want to know why the Alliance's proposal won't do much for low - income families facing higher energy costs as a result of a carbon fee (though it would produce a lot of union trade jobs by funding State infrastructure spending) start here: http://www.sightline.org/2016/08/16/green-stamps-a-climate-equity-proposal-for-the-pacific-northwest/

It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap - and - trade schemes.

If domestic cap - and - trade legislation were passed, it could result in a loss of 1.9 million American jobs in 2012 and 2.5 million American jobs by 2025.

Whereas the Senate strongly believes that the proposals under negotiation, because of the disparity of treatment between Annex I Parties and Developing Countries and the level of required emission reductions, could result in serious harm to the United States economy, including significant job loss, trade disadvantages, increased energy and consumer costs, or any combination thereof; and

In North Carolina alone, we lost hundreds of thousands of jobs as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

A study by Trade Partnership Worldwide, a consulting group, found the resulting higher steel prices cost 200,000 Americans their jobs, representing $ 4 billion in lost wages.

If trade wars do begin, it could kill jobs, wage levels, and investment, resulting in a slide.