Sentences with phrase «trading at no added cost»

Depending on each investor's contributing tier, they might be eligible for the Free Forever program where ICO investors can enjoy unlimited trading at no added cost.

Not exact matches

I like to add an additional 2 or 3 pips to cover my trading costs when adjusting my stop loss (see the image above), although it's not really necessary if you're planning to scale out at TP # 1.

At Trimark, trading costs were a super-low 0.05 % typically (many high turnover funds can add 2.0 — 3.0 % in costs).

Adding the trading costs to the weighted average MER of the portfolio at 22 basis points brings the total expense to less than 30 basis points (0.30 %).

If you are making monthly or bi-weekly investments to an from your paycheck, your trading costs might add up to much more than that: 26 paycheck - deduction - style purchases at $ 5 each would run you an extra $ 130 per year.

My conclusion was that TFG trades at a discount because of it's egregious fee structure a — i.e. if you have the same underlying risk on two bonds and someone «steals» 20 % of your coupon then that bond should naturally trade at a discount... I chose to invest in CIFU as it consistently pays out 50 % of all free cash as dividend and reinvests the other 50 % in similar asset and its running at much lower cost base and REALLY is a pure play (i.e. no Asset Management assets)-- adding to that ISA eligible and CIFU stands out from my perspective.

Trading stocks online sometimes starts at a certain price and if you buy multiple shares then the costs can add up and if the stocks don't increase or they suddenly hit the floor then you can lose your entire investment.

You can now choose both Ultra Combos at the cost of reduced damage for each, a balanced trade - off that adds some great uncertainty.

While most cost - estimating has focused on GDPs, trade and other such figures, Larsen's work is different in that it gauges the effect of climate change by adding up all the dollars of adapting to a warmer world, one bridge and one building at a time.

But we don't even have to argue semantics — it's downright misleading for Everley to term cap and trade an «energy tax» because cap and trade would not institute an added cost for all energy production across the board, as he (and the whole fleet of Republicans out there employing this language at the moment) would like you to believe.

Beyond dispute is that consumers» savings at the pump will far outweigh the cost of the technologies required to meet the new standards with enough left over, in fact, to offset the added price at the pump associated with the cap - and - trade program contained in the House and Senate climate bills.