Sentences with phrase «trading bigger cap»

I will go with 5 positions with 20 % allocation if I am trading bigger cap stocks.

Not exact matches

Responding to Tory charges that the NDP's proposed cap - and - trade system would wind up raising gas prices by 10 cents per litre, Jack Layton blamed Stephen Harper «s subsidies to big oil companies and support for the harmonized sales tax in Ontario for higher gas prices.

Sell this market for trade, for shortfalls in big cap stocks, for insecurity stemming from President Trump's caginess or erratic behavior, depending upon your orientation.

The raids follow moves by the finance ministry to identify ways to tax the market that has become as big as the nation's small - cap Kosdaq index in terms of daily trading volume.

The issue figures to feature prominently in the next federal election, with Liberal Leader Stà © phane Dion arguing the benefits of a carbon tax, while NDP Leader Jack Layton makes the case that cap - and - trade would do a better job of putting the costs on big polluters rather than on low - income families.

Penny stocks trade under different rules to small cap stocks, which trade according to the same rules that govern big caps.

There was no salary cap difference with that trade, so it was indeed to get bigger for whatever reason.

You only trade him if you get a boatload of valuable picks... As for his money, the salary cap goes up 9 million next year, and roughly 10 the year after, beside Carr how many big money guys are you picturing still on the team, this is gonna be a alot of 2018 - 2019 draft pick on the team, better hope we draft well, but I bet we keep Mack, unless somebody wants to blow the Raiders away with an offer.

«Charlie Crist has repeatedly joined with big government liberals on major economic issues facing America today, from taxes to spending to cap - and - trade,» Chocola said.

The bigger question, according to political analysts, is whether Christie's action places a long - term chill on prospects for cap and trade in other states.

This week, House Democrats are beginning their push for a cap - and - trade scheme that makes big promises, but amounts to little more than a national energy tax that will destroy countless jobs and raise energy prices on families and small businesses already struggling during this recession.

That, in itself, is also a big statement, because many companies who support cap and trade in theory also want many or most of the permits gratis.

«There are a huge number of industries and people who do not want us to move to the world beyond fossil fuels - these are the biggest fans of cap - and - trade,» he wrote in a May 2009 letter to carbon traders.

In his campaign last fall, President Barack Obama called for a «cap and trade» plan that would auction off carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions allowances to big carbon polluters.

I oppose «cap and trade» and other big government schemes because they will destroy jobs while likely having minimal impact on the climate.»

«The fact that oil prices are so low right now makes all this a much less big deal,» Lucas Davis, an associate professor at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, said about cap and trade.

Value stocks» outperformance is even more pronounced for small and mid cap companies, because they tend to trade at even bigger discounts due to illiquidity and lack of analyst coverage, as well as being able to achieve higher growth rates than larger companies.

But its market cap is trading at nearly 13x the estimated 2012 revenues, which feels a lot more comfortable to investors who are betting on big growth ahead.

I think this is a very important macro-econ measure, but there is a big problem in that it only captures publicly traded mkt cap, and over long periods, the public / private structure of the economy changes.

In addition to small cap and big cap value funds I also lightened up on GM & GMAC junk bonds and added to my investment grade bonds by buying AAA and AA exchange traded debt issues that were mainly utilities and financial companies.

Gates hammered on points reported here for many years: that without a big, and sustained, boost in spending on basic research and development on energy frontiers, the chances of triggering an energy revolution are nil; that while the private sector and venture capital investors are vital for transforming breakthroughs into marketable products or services, they will not invest in the long - haul inquiry that's required to generate game - changing breakthroughs; that a 1 or 2 percent tax on carbon - emitting fuels could generate a large, steady stream of money for invigorating the innovation pipeline; that a declining emissions cap and credit trading system --- if it could survive America's polarized politics --- would have to raise energy costs far beyond what would be politically tenable to generate a similar scale of transformational activity.

Many greens, including me, had big problems with Waxman - Markey, the failed cap and trade bill that would have finally priced carbon but also given a lifeline to the coal industry.

Cap and trade easily activates strong values - based opposition from right - leaning Americans and can be efficiently folded into a larger narrative about big government.

The uniformity in outlook among Republicans and the divide among Democrats, in combination with the 60 votes needed in the Senate to pass legislation, again underscores the mobilization challenge in regards to a «big bill» strategy such as cap and trade as discussed earlier.

Thanks to the work of these guys, it assumes that «cap and trade» and «environmental studies» and «the U.N.» are all understood as signifiers for «big government radical» — it doesn't even have to say anything outright negative or untrue.

2) I would argue that even before discussing strategic errors related to compromise around specific areas of legislation, we need to consider whether a «big bill» approach such as cap and trade — that required technically complex deals with almost every relevant special interest and industry sector in the country — was ever even politically possible or sustainable if it did manage to pass.

In nearly 100 pages, he explores who had the biggest advantage — in money and media spin — in the fight over a cap - and - trade climate bill, along with cultural issues, like the deep liberal tilt among scientists, that flavor how such battles are waged.

Moreover, conservative groups could efficiently fold cap and trade legislation into a larger meta - narrative opposing big government, taxes, «socialism» and «Obamacare.»

Clearly, the EU and China are doing far better than the U.S. Note that I am not a big believer in the likelihood of carbon taxes or a cap and trade system bringing enough renewables online quickly enough to save the climate just due to investors reactions to higher energy prices.

It's telling that USCAP represents some of the biggest polluters and the companies that have the most to potentially gain economically from carbon cap - and - trade systems.

jeremy, the amount of skeptics» funding from oil companies is a tired nostrum; the big money is to be made from the trillions to be siphoned from cap and trade offsets, carbon taxes to be collected, academic «research» grants to co2 warriors, etc. not to mention al gore's recently closed (filled!)

«Cap and trade» or a «carbon tax» to mitigate catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)(aka «climate change») is the biggest hole in the ground ever conceived in which to bury our wealth and starve the poor.

Probably the biggest grievance environmental justice advocates had with AB 398, according to Bill Magavern, policy director of the Coalition for Clean Air, is a specific provision that prohibits California's Air Resources Board and local air districts from directly regulating carbon emissions by sources that are also subject to the state's cap - and - trade program.

Arbitrarily adjusting the allowance bank because it is «too» big is unusual for cap and trade programs.

That's why so many big companies support cap - and - trade.

Linking other national or regional cap - and - trade emissions trading systems to the EU ETS can create a bigger market, potentially lowering the aggregate cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

But cap and trade applies to California's biggest and most notorious polluters.

Many utilities and big oil companies spent millions pushing cap and trade.

Frontline communities denounce Gov. Brown and Big Oil's cap - and - trade deal for perpetuating ongoing environmental injustices with too many giveaways to industry.

Moreover, just as the cap - and - trade debate set off a flurry of industry efforts to shape the system to their interests, so too will a big technology push; the only change will be in the set of supplicants.

The report is critical of cap and trade schemes, like the one the federal government is seeking to introduce, as well as big compensation to polluters.

As your Michigan House colleague Congressman Dingell says «cap and trade is a tax, and it's a great big one.»

«Nobody in this country realizes that cap - and - trade is a tax, and a great big one,» Rep. John Dingell (D - Mich.)

As both the House and the Senate grapple with proposed carbon - cutting measures — carbon taxes and «cap - and - trade» schemes for big CO2 emitters such as coal - fired power plants; increased Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars, SUVs, and trucks; and mandatory set - asides for clean renewable energy in the mix of energy generation options — emissions from aircraft seem, at least for the time being, to have gone over the heads of most policymakers engaged in the rush to cut carbon emissions.

Both the Sierra Club and 350.org eschewed the inside - the - Beltway focus and top - down political strategy of big mainstream environmental groups, as exemplified by the cap - and - trade campaign.

Democrats and special interest groups representing big labor and big business are screwing the taxpayers and consumers out of trillions, yet «Cap & Trade» won't impact the climate at all.

Cap and trade, once a cornerstone national energy policy among Democrats and moderate Republicans, has become a target of conservatives, who call it cap and tax and say it's emblematic of the Obama administration's «big government» approaCap and trade, once a cornerstone national energy policy among Democrats and moderate Republicans, has become a target of conservatives, who call it cap and tax and say it's emblematic of the Obama administration's «big government» approacap and tax and say it's emblematic of the Obama administration's «big government» approach.

In this case, a new, big government law enforcing «cap & trade» policies would be all the guarantee he needs to make his energy investments a winner.

Probably the biggest shortcomings in the bill are not the cap - and - trade portion but all the other sections, particularly those dealing with agriculture and biofuels.

As far as I can tell, Cap and Trade doesn't touch the 33 % of emissions that come from the transportation sector because CaT is targeted at big industry and utilities.