It is an enduring
tradition for humans to create self - portraits.
Celebrating the 4th of July is a great American
tradition for us humans.
Not exact matches
«Part of it is the nature of working with creative people that are looking
for an outlet to express it not just in their work, but as a way of showing affection
for their co-workers and having fun,» explains Bluebeam's Chief
Human Capital Officer, Tracy Heverly, about the
tradition.
Eve Tushnet has written beautifully on a vision of friendship
for gay Catholics, encouraging them to recover a fundamental aspect of the Catholic
tradition of
human ecology that has been missing in modern times.
The Catholic
tradition — even the wise Pope Benedict — still seems to put too much stress upon caritas, virtue, justice, and good intentions, and not nearly enough on methods
for defeating
human sin in all its devious and persistent forms.
Third, it was the
tradition of Christian humanism which led the White Rose to see the essence of the anti-humanism of the Nazis in their disregard
for the sanctity of individual
human life.
The Baptist
tradition, as shaped by American revivalism in the Great Awakenings, has generally leaned toward Arminianism, a modified version of predestination proposed by Jacob Arminius (d. 1609) that allowed a greater role
for human cooperation in salvation.
Understanding this new perspective on church is as difficult today as it was in the days of Jesus
for Jews to understand a different perspective on Sabbath, but the basic principles seem to be the same: Church, just like Sabbath, is not supposed to be a bunch of
human traditions which have become legalistic laws by which to judge one another's spiritual maturity.
Each of the three will denote the good
for a
human individual.1 Because of its long association with the liberal
tradition, «interest» is so often used to mean an individual's private happiness that the phrase «private view of interest» may seem redundant.
Such cultural pluralism is consistent with the requirements of
human nature
for a determinate social matrix, and it provides
for continued enrichment of the life of mankind through a variety of contrasting
traditions.
A third, a physician in New York City, praised the Catholic
tradition for its emphasis on
human dignity and social justice, but added: «I am troubled by the fact that I find greater acceptance of myself as a whole person in my professional community as a physician, than I do in the official hierarchy of the church of my family, my childhood, and my life.»
Knowledge which depends on
human experience and
traditions related to the Prophet concerning such matters are not the basis
for Islamic legislation.
I write from the standpoint of a Church of England parish priest and many of my examples are from that
tradition, but I recognize that the Church of England is one church amongst many churches, just as Christianity is one religion amongst many world religions which are slowly learning to share with each other their spiritual treasures and to work together
for peace, the relief of
human need and the preservation of the planet.
We have also become aware that the anthropocentrism that characterizes much of the Judeo - Christian
tradition has often fed a sensibility insensitive to our proper place in the universe.2 The ecological crisis, epitomized in the possibility of a nuclear holocaust, has brought home to many the need
for a new mode of consciousness on the part of
human beings,
for what Rosemary Ruether calls a «conversion» to the earth, a cosmocentric sensibility (Ruether, 89).3
suffering, true sociality, as qualities of the divine, along with radical differences (as we shall see) in the meanings ascribed to creation, the universe,
human freedom, and in the arguments
for the existence of God, those inclined to think that any view that is intimately connected with theological
traditions must have been disposed of by this time should also beware lest they commit a non sequitur.
In the Judeo - Christian
tradition, the church has never separated its message of salvation from its concern
for concrete service to
human beings, including the healing of sickness.
For some Christians within the North American evangelical
tradition, the work of racial reconciliation can be boiled down to the idea that there is only one race, the
human race.
The Primary Purpose of Sex and Marriage: Procreation Holloway's rooting of the purpose of sex in the Incarnation is a unique argument in favour of the conclusion articulated by the
tradition and by many contemporary orthodox Catholic scholars, namely, that the «primary reason
for the existence of sex in
human nature in the intention of God is
for children».
On the other hand, there is no God of a religious
tradition cut off from critical reflection so that «it is wrong
for religion's advocate to confound the object of this affirmation with the modalities of the affirmation; it is wrong
for him to believe that the transcendence of the divine mystery is extended to the materiality of the expressions that it takes on in
human consciousness; with greater reason it is wrong
for him to consider that his problematic is canonized by this transcendence.
The
traditions themselves have allowed a place
for common
human experience.
In opposition to the blatant violation of
human rights everywhere in the world, perhaps the faithful of all religious
traditions will join together to do the will of God
for the sake of all humanity.
Still, such theorists also continue, as did Kant himself, the modern natural law
tradition, at least in the following way: The duties prescribed by nonteleological liberalism are defined in terms of rights that are prior to any inclusive good; that is, these rights are separated from, and respect
for them overrides, any inclusive telos
humans might pursue.
Appraisal, he tells us, involves discerning (1) the ontological features of the
human, especially in its relation to the divine, (2) what is «enduring, true and real» about the
tradition, (3) what this truth implies
for concrete «choices, styles, patterns and obligations» of life, and (4) the connection between these different levels of truth in the
tradition and concrete situations that we confront in our everyday life.
Furthermore, despite the emphasis by such theologians as Augustine, Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, and Reinhold Niebuhr (with whom Schlesinger enjoyed a personal association) on the need to distinguish between divine and
human authority, it is a gross distortion of all of their views
for Schlesinger to impute to them the kind of relativism which makes the existence of God and the reality of revelation (the basis of all western religious
traditions) so utterly irrelevant
for public life.
Thus support
for human rights in the Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities follows a pattern: each group believes that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other human rights standards established through international law derive authority from the teachings of its own religious tradi
human rights in the Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities follows a pattern: each group believes that the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and other human rights standards established through international law derive authority from the teachings of its own religious tradi
Human Rights and other
human rights standards established through international law derive authority from the teachings of its own religious tradi
human rights standards established through international law derive authority from the teachings of its own religious
tradition.
For instance, in writings such as Judaism and
Human Rights (Norton, 1972), edited by Milton Konvitz, Jews argue that human rights are rooted in the Jewish tradi
Human Rights (Norton, 1972), edited by Milton Konvitz, Jews argue that
human rights are rooted in the Jewish tradi
human rights are rooted in the Jewish
tradition.
«Through our church here, we carry on the
tradition like fellowship groups
for the elderly... we also have a debt advice service... we also work with victims of
human trafficking.»
And yet, even this limitation is not without its usefulness,
for it can surely lead to the appreciative evaluation of other, non-Western expressions of the meaning and destiny of
human existence without thereby relinquishing insights to be gained by attention to Christian history and
tradition.
He states that he advanced beyond his contemporaries and was zealous
for his father's
traditions (1.14), thus describing his experience of Judaism in
human, not divine terms.
22 and God's concern
for human suffering has a strong biblical
tradition behind it (Patrick Miller Jr..
Today, Christians of integrity are thrown back upon the never reducible testimony of Scripture,
Tradition and the divine Spirit — a testimony that defies possession, but also manifests an exceptional trust in the insight, imagination, reasonableness and spiritual courage of ordinary
human beings when they are modest enough to ask
for what they do not and can not possess.
For example, there is the left - leaning «progressive»
tradition that locates
human dignity and progress as its central affirmations.
Second, we must use the vast ethical and conceptual resources of the Judeo - Christian
tradition to develop a God - centered ecological ethic which accounts
for the sacredness of the earth without losing sight of
human worth and justice.
Nevertheless, the classical humanistic
tradition, with its emphasis on the common distinctive qualities of man, provides stronger support
for the democratic ideal of
human equality than does evolutionary naturalism, with its concern
for the continuity of man with the lower forms of life.
Faith presupposes a context of certain practices and even bodily transformation»
for our flesh is redeemed by Christ's own flesh» and can not be considered a general feature of
human nature that finds diverse expression in all the great religious
traditions.
See Between Man and Man (London: Regan Paul 1947), p. 89) Such communication by a teacher who has a deep feeling
for a religious
tradition often leads students to an encounter with the meanings which speak to
human needs from that
tradition.
Still, this commitment is sufficiently prominent in the
tradition to provide contemporary Buddhists with a basis
for protest against the economic theory that the only value of animals is the price
humans will pay
for them and against the factory farming that this theory supports.
Tradition has assumed a new significance
for Protestants in a period dominated by the historical understanding of
human life.
On balance, Berger's theoretical perspective has provided a modern apologetic
for the value of religion, arguing not from theological
tradition but from the secular premises of social science that
humans can not live by the bread of everyday reality alone.
Is it a problem, a defeat
for our religion or do we discover that the interrelationship of people of different religious
traditions is of benefit
for our life as
human beings in this global village?
In the philosophic
tradition it is the idealists rather than the naturalists who have made the fullest place
for this insight into the essentially social character of
human existence, though contemporary naturalism as in Mead, Dewey, and Wieman has achieved a similar perspective.
In your excellent editorial article, you write: «There has been a long -
tradition within Catholic catechesis
for making a rational case
for the immortal nature of men... She (the Catholic Church) needs to make a renewed case
for her teaching concerning the
human soul.
For the central assertion of the Christian
tradition is that the eternal Reality, invisible to
human eyes, has made Himself known to men through material mediation.
In Christian Scripture and
tradition, then, we find an ethic of care
for strangers that renders precarious the protection of daughters; an ethic of chastity — laden with innuendos of pleasure, lust and pride — that renders precarious the moral standing and
human rights of women; and an ethic of Christian duty that renders precarious the basic safety of wives.
If the constitutive assertion of this witness, however expressed or implied, is specifically christological, in that it is the assertion, in some terms or other, of the decisive significance of Jesus
for human existence, the metaphysical implications of this assertion are specifically theological in that they all either are or clearly imply assertions about the strictly ultimate reality that in theistic religious
traditions is termed «God.»
And if the desire
for a final justice is part of our
human longing, so too is that longing
for something more, whatever it might be, that Kass and the Western
tradition have long sought.
If sufficiently original,
human response may shape the common culture inherited by our fellows,
for every
tradition blindly received originally had its purpose and justification, however feeble that might have been.
From the perspective of James Madison's observations about factions and freedom in Federalist No. 10,
for example, the respect
for tradition and the flourishing of faith is not a glitch but a feature of a free society, which encourages the development of a variety of
human types.
I have suggested elsewhere that value - free technology, the military - industrial complex, and narrow nationalism might be modern examples of such principalities and powers.9 Hendrikus Berkhof suggests that
human traditions, astrology, fixed religious rules, clans, public opinion, race, class, state, and Volk are among the powers.10 Walter Wink sees the powers as the inner aspects of institutions, their «spirituality,» the inner spirit or driving force that animates, legitimates, and regulates their outward manifestations.11 They are «the invisible forces that determine
human existence «12 When such things dehumanize
human life, thwart and distort the
human spirit, block God's gift of shalom, the followers of Jesus are rallied
for a new kind of holy war.
By the following century Lutheran theology had returned to the medieval
tradition in which it was thought that the souls of the departed already live in blessedness with Christ in a bodiless condition, and where,
for this reason, the significance of the general resurrection was considerably lessened.56 It was left to extremist Christian groups, such as the Anabaptists, to affirm the doctrine of soul - sleep and to describe
human destiny solely in terms of a fleshly resurrection at the end - time.