Founded in Brazil in 1961, the 8,000 - member religion mixes
traditional Christianity with indigenous beliefs.
Two unorthodox theological currents confronted
traditional Christianity — one convinced of God's living reality, the other preaching his obituary.
While it is quite possible that the tried and true methods of
traditional Christianity are exactly what Jesus wanted for the church 1900 years ago, or 1500 years ago, or 500 years ago, or even 50 years ago, what Jesus wants for the church may be very different today.
Mormonism has a different understanding of the nature of Jesus Christ than that of
traditional Christianity (as expressed in the Nicene Creed).
The answer is not obscure:
traditional Christianity awaits them, complete with adoration of Christ as God, obedience to Christ as Lord, dependence on Christ as Savior, humble confession of sin and a serious effort to live Christ's life of self - sacrifice, detachment from the world, righteousness, holiness and purity of thought, word and deed.
The problem is that sticking with the tried and true methods of
traditional Christianity may in fact be sinful!
Christians need have no alarm about this, for the other - worldly concern with a supernatural unseen heaven, which has dominated
traditional Christianity, is really foreign to the witness of both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
The Christ who lives on is not the bodily exalted Jesus of
traditional Christianity who was raised from the dead on Easter morning.
This thought of possibly leading the church into sin so terrifies people that they attempt to change nothing, and stick instead with the tried and true methods of
traditional Christianity.
The new cultural forces which have emanated from the west and which are causing the decay of
traditional Christianity also threaten the future of the other great post-Axial traditions.
The implications of such a view may be much more disturbing to
traditional Christianity, but they must not be confused with those of an earlier mechanistic naturalism.
I even suggested to him that evening that with his creative capacity he might develop a view going beyond both reincarnation and
traditional Christianity to some form of fulfillment implicit in the Christian faith, but not yet brought to light.
Traditional Christianity understood not primarily as a system of ideas but as a shared way of life with caritas at its center, and the historical effects of the manifold failures to enact caritas from the Middle Ages to the present, is one of the book's major themes.
Critics say it represents a break from
traditional Christianity, which they say holds that heaven and hell are very real places.
I am basically an atheist / agnostic, but I have lived among Mormons and although I think their theology is even weirder than
traditional Christianity, I think their sense of community is closer to the communal life of early Christians than any other traditional Christian group.
Satan used Protestantism to attack belief in
traditional Christianity, and Protestantism's children to attack all belief in God.
Since the advent of formal experimental methodology science has, sadly, been widely perceived as a threat to
traditional Christianity.
It has challenged the validity of
traditional Christianity at many points, but at the same time it is out of Christendom that the new world has emerged.
These are merely part of the «etiological myth» to account for death produced by
a traditional Christianity influenced by Jewish and Greek cultural concerns, by scholasticism, by the «personal preoccupations» ofAugustine (and Luther), and continued by Anselm, Aquinas and the Council of Trent (p88).
Nor is he alone in this, for it has been very much a part of
traditional Christianity as commonly taught, preached, and understood.
Has anyone ever thought that
the traditional Christianity as you call it may very well be incorrect?
The hard left has made it clear that it regards
traditional Christianity as a backward religion that should be made to submit to the continually escalating demands of leftist «social justice.»
7 - 10; the criticism of
traditional Christianity including that of the Reformers in Volume II, chaps.
For
traditional Christianity (and for all traditional religions) moral rights and wrongs reflect cosmic truths.
While Osteen described the Mormon faith as «not
traditional Christianity,» he said he believes Mormons fall under the Christian tent.
Certainly there are some distinct differences between modern secular culture and the state of Christendom out of which it has come, just as there are great differences between
traditional Christianity and the Judaism out of which it emerged, and of which it claimed to be the fulfilment.
They are promoting their chosen ideology and attempting to undermine
traditional Christianity.
With
traditional Christianity gone as a source for coherence, what else was there?
Jefferson's «self - evident» truths were deistic ones: The pursuit of happiness is understood to be what God intended for humans from the creation, in contrast to
traditional Christianity's understanding of the pre-eminent importance of glorifying God.
To reformers it seemed that colleges had to be freed from clerical control, and hence usually from
traditional Christianity, in order to achieve something that we take for granted — the emergence of higher education as a separate profession, distinct from the role of clergy.
American radical theology, or the death - of - God movement, is generally seen as a negation of
traditional Christianity in the name of honesty and modernity.
It is of course the fault of
traditional Christianity that it has too often forgotten how radical the canonical Gospels are.
Each verse has a dozen or so understandings and applications within
traditional Christianity.
While Osteen said Mormonism is «not
traditional Christianity,» he believes Mormons fall under the Christian tent.
A more beautiful vision To found inter-faith dialogue upon a human nature which is profoundly fulfilled by obeying commands of God, which, moreover, are universal norms, is (again) to play more on the ground of
traditional Christianity.
One consequence of the decline of
traditional Christianity has been the substitution of pastors and confessors with the «agony aunts» of the newspapers and magazines.
Traditional Christianity subjugates women and makes them property of men.
Traditional Christianity has always maintained a healthy respect for non-belief.
For example, as George Grant and David Schindler have shown, technology brings with it a different view of reality from that of
traditional Christianity.
Many of them propose significant reforms and reformulations of
traditional Christianity — reforms that find few followers.
The seriousness of this destruction must be emphasized in view of the devaluation of bodies, especially women's bodies, in
traditional Christianity.
He argues that the credibility of
traditional Christianity is based not on the fact that the divine text is preserved from human mediations but from the contrary fact.
In order to prove that proposition, one would have to show that in earlier eras, before the time of Nietzsche, Darwin, Feuerbach, and Marx, when
traditional Christianity had a stronger hold on the Western mind, wars were fought more prudently and humanely.
I don't think he ever compared the «Mormonism» to «
Traditional Christianity.»
If you do nt feel that what Mormons believe is «
Traditional Christianity» so be it.
Traditional Christianity forbids these things but the early Protestants allowed all of these arrangements.
As much as he'd like to compare it to
traditional Christianity, Mormonism can't be reconciled to it.
He admitted that his approach would «satisfy neither the liberals in politics and religion, nor the political radicals nor the devotees of
traditional Christianity.»
Test 1: «Differences between the LDS Church and most of
traditional Christianity include... a doctrine of «exaltation» which includes the ability of humans to become gods and goddesses in the afterlife.»
In antiquity in particular, the vivid belief in a Second Coming was
traditional Christianity.