Portfolio managers have the flexibility to respond, with discretion, to market events and operate outside the confines
of traditional benchmark indices.
The company is well - known for using proprietary algorithms to evaluate the creditworthiness of an applicant, instead of relying solely on
traditional benchmarks such as credit score and income.
To that end, states seem to be using the SQSS indicator as an opportunity to innovate and collaborate to develop methods of assessing school quality and student success that go
beyond traditional benchmarks.
Franklin Liberty ETF portfolio managers have the opportunity to respond to market events, navigate through various market environments and invest outside the confines of
traditional benchmark index products.
Though some think active stock - picking is the way to go, since the goal there is to
outperform traditional benchmarks, Kirzner is still a big believer in his strategy, which is essentially investing on cruise control.
Our aim is to provide our clients with «value added» (excess) returns over and
above traditional benchmarks, while at the same time taking on less risk than the overall market.
Traditional benchmarks like the S&P 500 or Russell 1000 may work fine for actively managed large - cap stock funds, but they'll likely fail to do the job for target - date funds.
An absolute return strategy is independent
of traditional benchmarks such as the S&P 500 Index or the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, which gives it the freedom to invest in a wide variety of securities as well as a variety of strategies to hedge specific types of risk.
For instance, according to Standard and Poor's article Looking
Beyond Traditional Benchmarks To Add Value In Emerging Markets, traditional market capitalization weighted emerging market indices like the MSCI Emerging Market Index have a heavier concentration to the more mature economies like South Korea.
Franklin Liberty ETF portfolio managers have the opportunity to respond to market events, navigate through various market environments and invest outside the confines of
traditional benchmark index products
Hybrid indexes may be on the rise but
the traditional benchmarks — the Standard & Poor's 500 index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average index or the Barclays Bond index — still dominate.
IOM's rationale: «new benchmarks... are needed to complement
the traditional benchmarks for academic success that focus on individual accomplishments and products (e.g. publications, new grants).»
And the government is said to be planning to scrap
the traditional benchmark on which secondary schools in England are measured - the number of pupils getting five good GCSEs (grades A * to C), including maths and English.
Hyundai obviously chose
the traditional benchmarks in this category — the Honda Civic and the Toyota Corolla — when it was looking at competitive products.
With the rapid erosion of traditional publishing,
the traditional benchmarks of career success have eroded, too.
The traditional benchmark for comparison, as others have mentioned, is the rate of return (including dividends) from the Standard and Poors 500 Index.
Unconstrained to
a traditional benchmark, this Fund is one of the industry's longest - running absolute return strategies.
For investors allocating their fixed - income portfolios, that means it is time to consider investing opportunities outside of
traditional benchmarks.
Traditional benchmarks, such as the S&P 500 and Russell 3000, weight companies according to their stock - market value.
DFA very actively researches historical market data, and seeks to increase returns relative to
traditional benchmarks, by keeping costs low through their proprietary and flexible trading methods.
Portfolio managers of the Franklin Liberty active ETFs have the opportunity to respond with discretion to market events and operate outside the confines of
traditional benchmark indices.
«In exchange for less upside when all is going great, the stocks in these indexes tend not to explore any correction depths to the same degree as
traditional benchmarks,» says Rebetez.
The funds» returns are compared against the S&P / TSX Composite Index,
the traditional benchmark for Canadian equity funds.