Unlike
traditional big donors who often reach their quota for a given candidate with a single check, small donors can contribute again and again, providing a financial consistency that's useful in a short campaign and priceless in a long one.
I'm exaggerating of course, but in many people's eyes, she clearly had the nomination sewed up: she'd locked - in
the traditional big donors and was already getting endorsements by the score from superdelegates - to - be.
Not exact matches
The
biggest critique that I have is that in resent political cycles there have been concerted efforts to bring in small
donors on the left while the right has relied mostly on the
traditional big money contributions.
But as the
big traditional donors attend their last $ 1000 - a-plate dinners, small
donors across the country should become every campaign's target, in part because a campaign can turn to them for money again and again.
Though the basic premise is filled with potential, offering a unique spin on the
traditional rom - com formula that takes a
big risk with its time - hopping narrative, the characters aren't very compelling (or likable, for that matter) apart from Travis Fimmel's socially awkward sperm
donor, who disappears around the 30 - minute mark never to be heard from again.
Commonly cited concerns include the potential for outsized influence of
big money
donors on the policy process relative to more
traditional voices in public education debates, such as teachers and other education practitioners.