In what ways do teachers and students benefit from this partnership, this change in
their traditional classroom relationship?
Not exact matches
The aim wasn't to deliver full courses online, rather to complement the
traditional school structure and
classroom teaching built on face - to - face
relationships.
Study examines the
relationship between pedagogy and
classroom control in
traditional and progressivist teaching practices.
Giroux caricatures the
traditional classroom as one where «students sit in rows staring at the back of each others» heads and at the teacher who faces them in symbolic, authoritarian fashion»; «events are governed by a rigid time schedule imposed by a system of bells and reinforced by cues from teachers»; we «glorify the teacher as the expert [and] dispenser of knowledge»; «social
relationships... are based upon power relations inextricably linked to the teacher's allotment of grades»; and tracking «alienates students from schooling.»
Because the studios foster direct and conversational
relationships, they help avoid the passivity and isolation associated with
traditional classrooms.
Students experiencing various levels of abusive
relationships resulting in assignment to an RTC, do not lend themselves to a
traditional seven hour school day in a
classroom.
Special education and regular education faculty / staff roles and
relationships will change, as will the
traditional rules under which «things» happen within the
classroom, campus, and district.
All the
traditional and high - tech resources of education — from whiteboards to the Internet and even to
classrooms themselves — are best understood as different kinds of interfaces for
relationships that support learning.
It is based on more than a decade of research into the ways that
classroom power
relationships and
traditional teaching methods have failed to support indigenous learners.