Financial cuts have significantly decreased access to the legal process through
traditional court litigation.
In increasing numbers, employers, health care organizations and other businesses utilize arbitration as an alternative to
traditional court litigation to resolve their disputes.
In an effort to compare
traditional court litigation to increasingly popular methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in technology - related disputes, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) commissioned the International Survey On Dispute Resolution In Technology...
Not exact matches
As a
litigation lawyer, Michael Böhme's focus lies on the institutions of
traditional dispute resolution and in particular the
courts.
Arbitrations typically result in cost savings relative to full
litigation in the
traditional court system.
In
traditional litigation two lawyers (or teams of lawyers) hash out the divorce in a
court of law.
In her dissent, Chief Judge Prost argued that the AIA post-grant trial mechanism was a «new,
court - like proceeding -LSB-,]» and thus the construction standard that applies in
traditional litigation matters should apply.
Christopher specialises in
litigation and dispute resolution primarily in construction law; his experience includes
traditional High
Court litigation, arbitration as well as construction - focused adjudication.
Looking beyond that headline, however, the decision signals a balance between the federal
courts»
traditional role in patent
litigation, including ruling on the validity and unenforceability of issued patents, and the PTAB's administrative role in reviewing challenged patents.
Over the past decade or so,
courts have begun to favour many different approaches as alternatives to the
traditional model of
litigation.
Many people hire a trial lawyer and go the
traditional litigation route to fight it out in
court.
The
Court noted that public interest
litigation can change the
traditional rules around costs because it imports other important policy objectives.
Juriansz, J.A. wrote in his dissenting judgment that unlike the «
traditional» approach to
litigation, Rule 48.14 gives the
Court the right and duty to manage its own docket.
Arbitration agreements provide greater confidentiality, cost - savings and efficiency in resolving employee claims, when compared to
traditional court - based
litigation.
In
traditional patent
litigation, a patent was drafted to perform in district
court.
Courts are beginning to move from
court - connected ADR proceedings to facilitating internet - based negotiation, mediation and arbitration either as stand - alone approaches or to augment more
traditional, formal means of
litigation.
Some barristers, and some solicitors are rising to the challenge by designing packages to provide help to litigants ranging from advice on discrete aspects of
litigation bundled into defined «bite - sized» parcels to the full
traditional «on the
court record» service.
In addition to
traditional construction
litigation, our team provides expertise across the full range of
litigation undertaken in the modern Technology & Construction
Court.
The theme for Forum 2012, «Revitalizing
Courts with Enhanced Technology and Thought - Provoking Reforms: The Modernization Challenge», is designed to challenge attendees with leading edge sessions, including Enhancing Access to Justice Using Technology and Going Beyond Technology: Revisiting Fundamental Assumptions About
Traditional Litigation.
We have been less accustomed in Britain to dwell on the relationship of law and politics but we are seeing in public reaction (or at any rate the reaction of sections of the media) to the current
litigation over the triggering of Brexit that the
traditional detachment of our own
courts from the political battleground is not immune from challenge.
This course surveys the most common types of alternative dispute resolution processes: negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and
court - annexed and governmental - agency ADR - all of which have gained wide - spread use as alternatives to
traditional litigation.
Since the matter is being negotiated outside the
court system, the privacy of the husband and wife are upheld, as it is not subject to the same public record as a
traditional divorce
litigation.
As my law practice does not offer mediation services, but only «
traditional» divorce, I am more likely to encounter people who have the more difficult problems that require some
litigation of various issues in
court.
Unlike
traditional litigation, any agreement that is reached may not need to be filed with the clerk of the
court, helping private lives stay out of the public record.
In most cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the
traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the
court.
Mediation is an alternative to
traditional divorce
litigation that allows couples to come to an amicable resolution without going to
court.
The
traditional Family
Court system, which is based on
litigation with attorneys for each parent, tries to help families with children to resolve child - sharing disputes, but with mixed results.
Many divorcing couples, unwed parents of children and others involved in family disputes often find the no -
court process known as Collaborative Law a welcome alternative to the often destructive and damaging aspects of resolving disputes or marital breakups through the
traditional model of contested
litigation.
Anyone who has gone through the
traditional divorce
litigation process can probably relate and understand why the Florida
court system is known as an adversarial system.
In cooperative and collaborative divorce practice, the
traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of
litigation and
court hearings, is replaced by an approach that settles cases mindfully, practically, and respectfully.
This is in contrast to the
traditional litigation approach which requires your attorney to file your case with the
court, prepare for appearing in
court, and follow the
court - imposed rules and schedules.
Divorce mediation is typically much faster than a
traditional court proceeding: by avoiding potentially dozens of hours in the courtroom, couples can greatly reduce the cost of divorce as well as the stress of
litigation, without sacrificing the enforceability of a legally binding agreement.
Unlike the
traditional litigation approach where each party is represented by an attorney and the matter proceeds through the
courts, mediation allows the parties to work together with the help of a trained professional, to discuss their issues and to arrive at an agreement that works best for both of them and for their family.
Traditional divorce proceedings involve
litigation and
court proceedings.
In Collaborative Practice, the
traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of
litigation and
court intervention, is replaced by an approach that settles cases respectfully.
In
traditional litigation two lawyers (or teams of lawyers) hash out the divorce in a
court of law.
Of course, I will talk with them about
traditional litigation, which is the
court battle that often comes to mind when people think about divorce.
Collaborative Divorce is a means of resolving divorce, custody, and financial issues as an out - of -
court alternative to
litigation and
traditional mediation.
Many people hire a trial lawyer and go the
traditional litigation route to fight it out in
court.
Collaborative divorce presents a progressive and practical alternative to
traditional divorce
litigation and focuses on finding fair solutions that accommodate the wishes of both parties without going to
court.
Unlike in
traditional litigation, the spouses in a collaborative divorce are able to set the pace of the process and are not tied to the schedule of the
court.
Unlike
traditional litigation, the spouses in a collaborative divorce are able to set the pace of the process and are not tied to the schedule of the
court.