Sentences with phrase «traditional divorce»

In truth, even in traditional divorce litigation, parties rarely get the satisfaction of a judge telling them they are right.

Unfortunately, the emotional divorce is typically either ignored or exploited in traditional divorce litigation, making the whole experience much more expensive and stressful for parties who are already often in crisis.

One of the best parts of the Collaborative Process is the primary use of coaches (and not attorneys, as in the case of traditional divorce) to resolve parenting disputes.

What this means more specifically is that they have chosen to not work with traditional divorce cases.

Like a joint petition, a summary dissolution allows the couple to avoid many of the procedures involved with traditional divorce proceedings, including a trial.

Traditional divorce lawyers are focused on the divorce process.

Collaborative professionals around the country and, indeed, around the world are getting the word out that there is a better alternative to traditional divorce court battles: Collaborative Divorce.

Unlike traditional divorce litigation, matrimonial arbitration is conducted in private, between the spouses, their attorneys and the arbitrator.

There are other important differences between traditional divorce attorneys and Collaborative Divorce attorneys.

The right professional will guide you through the Collaborative process in such a way that you fully benefit from all that makes it different from traditional divorce.

We can assist you through the most difficult situations that occur in traditional divorce proceedings.

Just because you use traditional divorce litigation to start your case, that doesn't mean that you have to go all the way to trial.

Whereas traditional divorce often involves exchanging demands and accusations, the Collaborative approach proceeds on the basis of mutual cooperation and problem solving.

Although the couple remains married following an order of judicial separation, the court does issue the same types of orders found in a more traditional divorce case.

Divorce mediators, in contrast, explain that mediators can effectively address the power imbalance between such traditional divorcing spouses and that the mediation process can result in a fair settlement.

In many circumstances, the adversarial nature of traditional divorce lawsuits can make the situation even worse.

This may be because collaborative attorneys, unlike traditional divorce trial lawyers, have an incentive to help the spouses get along.

Traditional divorce requires that each party retains separate attorneys.

If you have reason to believe that a collaborative divorce might not work for you, then it may be best to pursue traditional divorce litigation.

With the help of a great divorce mediator, you and your family can navigate the new changes to the tax laws while saving time and money by avoiding traditional divorce litigation.

Traditional divorces rarely end after the divorce is legally finalized.

We all know about traditional divorce where it is a battle between parties and their lawyers to see who can win in the eyes of the judge.

In Collaborative Divorce, you each have your own Family Lawyers helping you sort out your needs, just as in traditional divorce.

Collaborative professionals around the country and, indeed, around the world are getting the word out that there is a better alternative to traditional divorce court battles: Collaborative Divorce.

It's also typically far less expensive than traditional divorce proceedings.

During the first half of my time in practice, I saw first - hand the costly (both financial and emotional), disadvantages to traditional divorce litigation.

In Collaborative Divorce the combativeness of litigation is replaced by a cooperative process that gives families resources unavailable in traditional divorce models.

Unlike traditional divorce methods, which can result in long, ugly battles and large legal bills, divorce mediation enables you and your spouse to create an effective separation agreement and present it to the court after as few as 3 or 4 mediation sessions.

For traditional divorce litigation, these longer waits mean higher costs for you.

Nancy Lugo, pro bono manager of Bay Area Volunteer Lawyers Program, believes the collaborative process sets up clients to move forward in a way traditional divorce does not.

Equitable Mediation took traditional divorce mediation and flipped it on its head.

In traditional divorce mediation, the divorcing couple reaches their own agreements in mediated sessions, settling such issues as child custody, parenting plans, child support, spousal support (alimony), and the division of retirement benefits and other property.

Explains the collaborative divorce practice in terms familiar to professionals who practice or have been educated and trained in more traditional divorce practice and are interested in representing one side of a dispute in a less adversarial manner.

Explore how traditional divorce litigation resembles the «Prisoner's Dilemma» and how a collaborative law attorney can ensure you avoid this in your divorce.

The typical traditional divorce case in Oregon goes to final trial eight to twelve months after it is filed with the court.

Our attorneys, who have more than 125 years of combined experience, excel at traditional divorce litigation, but have also helped establish our firm as one of the leading collaborative divorce and divorce mediation firms in the area.

What used to be called simply «divorce» is now being labeled traditional divorce as purportedly new methods of resolving divorce disputes are increasingly being promoted, through marketing efforts which are surfacing throughout the media.

New York is one of many U.S. states with a no - fault divorce law that allows certain divorce cases to be managed faster and more easily than traditional divorce filings.

Non-adversarial in nature, the goal of collaborative law is to minimize the conflict that is prevalent in so many traditional divorces.

Traditional divorce defines spouses as adversaries, courtrooms as battlefields, and lawyers as gladiators.

Journey Beyond Divorce was created after witnessing firsthand how ineffectual and limited traditional divorce therapy can be.

The Collaborative Divorce model was developed in the early 1990s by attorneys, mental health professionals and financial planning experts whose experience with traditional divorce led them to the conclusion that family law litigation is injurious to families and especially to children.

Previous posts have talked at length about how collaborative divorce tends to the always - present emotional divorce in ways that divorce litigation (or even traditional divorce negotiation) does not do.

Fewer and fewer clients adopt the divorce is war mentality that characterized traditional divorce and family law processes.

Therefore, in answer to my first question, «Is there a power imbalance between traditional divorcing spouses?

Epona Law and Mediation offers an alternative to the costly, adversarial process of traditional divorce.

Collaborative attorneys make the following commitments which are very different than the approach of traditional divorce attorneys: