Sentences with phrase «traditional divorce cases»

It CAN be done without the damage that is often seen in traditional divorce cases, and Margaret is a wonderful asset to this belief and this profession.

What this means more specifically is that they have chosen to not work with traditional divorce cases.

Some of the family law practice areas in addition to traditional divorce cases that are handled at our firm include:

From unique areas of the law, such as collaborative divorce, adoptions, and gestational and donor agreements to traditional divorce cases involving complex property division, our Austin family lawyers are dedicated to helping clients throughout Texas.

In a traditional divorce case, this would have taken months of pleadings, court hearings, potentially mediation and thousands of dollars to accomplish what we accomplished in two hours.

In a traditional divorce case, this would have taken months of pleadings, court hearings, potentially mediation and thousands of dollars to accomplish what we accomplished in two hours.

The typical traditional divorce case in Oregon goes to final trial eight to twelve months after it is filed with the court.

Although the couple remains married following an order of judicial separation, the court does issue the same types of orders found in a more traditional divorce case.

Barrington Illinois family law attorneys can represent individual clients during the collaborative process, just as they would in any traditional divorce case.

Unlike in a traditional divorce case, where each spouse may hire and pay for his or her own financial advisor to work exclusively with that party, a financial professional in a Collaborative Divorce is completely neutral.

Not exact matches

Crosby estimates that divorce professionals spend only 20 percent of the time on a Wevorce case that they would spend on a traditional divorce.

In Matthew 19:4 — 5, Jesus encourages a traditional path, but does not discourage alternatives, except in the case of divorce.

In Matthew 19: 4 - 5, Jesus encourages a traditional path, but does not discourage alternatives, except in the case of divorce.

With divorce and family law attorneys practicing in both Washington State and Oregon, we excel at providing counsel and representation in traditional cases, as well as cutting - edge family law matters like LGBT family law, international family law, and high - asset divorce.

In traditional divorce, since each spouse is zealously represented by their respective attorneys, it is no surprise that these proceedings are quite costly due to the extensive time involved in building a case for one's positions, often with the assistance of one or more forensic accountants or business appraisers.

It was another shining example of why Collaborative Divorce is such a great thing for clients that are willing to work with one another to resolve their case with less stress and pain than in a traditional «old - school» divorcDivorce is such a great thing for clients that are willing to work with one another to resolve their case with less stress and pain than in a traditional «old - school» divorcedivorce case.

We are experienced in traditional litigation, negotiated settlements, and the collaborative divorce method, and we will work with you to determine which approach best fits your case.

Uniquely, I am also able to offer a range of family law services from traditional representation to private divorce mediation, where appropriate, and even offer convenient online bundled services for those cases where you might otherwise be able to represent yourself, but need help with pleadings and document preparation and review.

A traditional contested divorce is a case in which the parties can not agree and must go to trial.

In the Gust case, a district court divorce decree required ex-husband to pay traditional spousal support in the amount of $ 1,400 monthly — as long as he was also paying child support for his young son.

He works with both traditional divorces, and large cases that require complex business valuation, framing of assets, net disposable income, taxation and all aspects of complicated financial matters involved in such cases.

Accordingly, most collaboratively - trained attorneys in the area, even those who have been practicing traditional court - based divorce for decades, have had 0, 1, or 2 collaborative cases.

It was another shining example of why Collaborative Divorce is such a great thing for clients that are willing to work with one another to resolve their case with less stress and pain than in a traditional «old - school» divorcDivorce is such a great thing for clients that are willing to work with one another to resolve their case with less stress and pain than in a traditional «old - school» divorcedivorce case.

For that reason, I am in the process of shifting my practice from a traditional law firm, to a firm that handles only collaborative divorce cases.

It is easily estimated that discovery alone in the traditional adversarial litigated divorce can cost more than $ 20,000 in a fairly routine case.

Although some states have moved away from traditional fault grounds, adultery may still affect certain aspects of a divorce, such as spousal support, property division, and in extreme cases, child custody determinations.

Your case could also be suitable for collaborative divorce, a relatively new legal approach that combines the best aspects of mediation and traditional litigation — but also enables you to settle your case outside of the courtroom with the assistance of specially trained attorneys and neutral counselors and financial experts, if needed.

Less Contentious — It goes without saying that because of the format of a collaborative divorce case, and by virtue of the fact that the parties are working together to reach a resolution that is in everyone's best interest rather than holding key facts back and worrying about what the next legal filing will be, a collaborative case is much less contentious than a traditional divorce.

The Collaborative Law Rule of Professional Conduct holds collaborative attorneys to a higher standard than traditional divorce lawyers, while the Collaborative Family Law Rule of Procedure, among other things, specifies when collaborative cases begin and end and defines the interaction between the courts and the collaborative process.

In most cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the court.

In those cases in which mediation, collaborative divorce, or other alternative means of dispute resolution are not viable alternatives, spouses will litigate their divorce in the traditional manner.

I was representing a wife in a traditional court divorce case.

Accordingly, most collaboratively - trained attorneys in the area, even those who have been practicing traditional court - based divorce for decades, have had 0, 1, or 2 collaborative cases.

Though the film has been controversial among family law professionals, as it is said to focus on the extreme of family law cases, there is an answer to the traditional courtroom divorce industry as portrayed in Divorce Corp.: collaborative law, which is now offered throughout Fdivorce industry as portrayed in Divorce Corp.: collaborative law, which is now offered throughout FDivorce Corp.: collaborative law, which is now offered throughout Florida.

This firm specializes in alternative dispute resolution in divorce cases, as well as traditional litigation.

This systems view has gradually replaced the traditional linear view of causality and it is particularly appropriate and useful in understanding the divorce process and the dynamics in child custody disputes, when escalation of the family system's dysfunction by the legal system's procedures is all too often the case the disputing families.

For years, couples had to go through the traditional court system to get a divorce or, at least, plead their case to do so.

The Traditional Divorce Settlement model looks different in different cases but tends to be more pared down than Collaborative Divorce, usually because the parties have a very uncomplicated financial estate, they do not have children together, there are no potentially problematic emotional / relational issues at play between the parties, or some combination of all three.

In cooperative and collaborative divorce practice, the traditional approach of bargaining from a specific position, backed by threats of litigation and court hearings, is replaced by an approach that settles cases mindfully, practically, and respectfully.

Before assuming you have no choice other than a traditional court - based divorce, it makes sense to consider a less adversarial method of resolving your case outside of the courtroom, such as divorce mediation or collaborative divorce.

Since the attorney disqualification agreement appears to be a requirement of the collaborative law process, in the off chance that the case does not settle in collaborative mediation, if there is no disqualification agreement, the parties are free to continue using their attorneys in the traditional litigation divorce process, which would not be an option with collaborative law.

The lawyer can also help them make some of the most important decisions of the case, especially in the beginning, so the person can decide whether they want a traditional or collaborative divorce and which assets they want to fight over as well as which ones they are willing to surrender.

Unfortunately this is often the case, particularly if the method to obtain the divorce is the traditional litigation method.

It is an exciting time as «Next Generation Divorce» is an active and professional group of Attorneys, Mental Health Professionals and Financial Professionals that have been collaboratively trained to help remove court cases from the traditional Court system.

If you put work into your settlement from the very beginning of your case then you increase the chance that the divorce process will take less time, be more amicable, and be more cost - efficient than a traditional litigation approach to divorce.

As a founder of our local collaborative practice group and a matrimonial attorney since the early 1980's, I regard collaborative practice as the answer to my dreams of a better way for handling matrimonial cases, and also a tacit acknowledgement that our traditional legal system has left much to be desired in the way of accommodating the real world of emotions and personal needs of divorcing people.

The fact is that very few divorce cases ever go to court; however, when you hire a divorce attorney using the traditional process, your attorney will proceed with your case as if it were going to court.

However, divorce cases resolved through the collaborative process sometimes (though not always) cost less than traditional litigated cases, because the parties and their lawyers do not hire their own sets of financial or mental - health experts: often, one neutral financial advisor takes part, for example.

«How is a Collaborative Divorce settlement different from a settlement in a traditional case?»