Sentences with phrase «traditional divorce court»

But, if the traditional divorce court process has been making you miserable, chances are it has also been just as devastating to your spouse, and so he or she may be open to trying something different.

Collaborative professionals around the country and, indeed, around the world are getting the word out that there is a better alternative to traditional divorce court battles: Collaborative Divorce.

Collaborative divorce is a peaceful and private alternative to the traditional divorce court battles that tear apart families and bank accounts.

However, it is a reasonable alternative to the traditional divorce court battles and has the potential to save spouses a great deal of money.

The spouses then proceed as «opposing parties» in the traditional divorce court route.

Not exact matches

In traditional litigation two lawyers (or teams of lawyers) hash out the divorce in a court of law.

The length of time needed for a collaborative divorce is often substantially less than that of the traditional divorce process, where the parties are at the mercy of the court's schedule.

The traditional divorce process could last for years, not only in waiting for the court's availability but also in completing the tedious process of document sharing and compilation.

In a traditional divorce case, this would have taken months of pleadings, court hearings, potentially mediation and thousands of dollars to accomplish what we accomplished in two hours.

- In a traditional divorce, the court process often causes hostility and conflict within a family and places the...

Such is the traditional viewpoint in Virginia courts that deters equality between mothers and fathers, and places families on a trajectory of constant conflict after divorce.

Along with it being much more cooperative and positive than going to court, a collaborative divorce can take less time and cost less money than a traditional divorce.

In the Gust case, a district court divorce decree required ex-husband to pay traditional spousal support in the amount of $ 1,400 monthly — as long as he was also paying child support for his young son.

Furthermore, a mediated divorce is usually much less expensive and takes considerably less time to complete than a traditional divorce settled in court.

Accordingly, most collaboratively - trained attorneys in the area, even those who have been practicing traditional court - based divorce for decades, have had 0, 1, or 2 collaborative cases.

But you don't need to go through a traditional court battle if divorce is on the horizon.

More and more people are deciding that they want to avoid the traditional adversarial divorce court system and instead handle their family law matter privately and respectfully via the collaborative process.

In a traditional divorce setting, especially those that reach a trial in court, the clients have virtually no say in the outcome as they have given that power to the court.

In a traditional divorce, Psychologists are used as expert witnesses to perform Custody Evaluations and then provide a written report or testify in court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the children.

Posted in business life insurance, court ordered life insurance, DUI, insurance, International Business insurance, life insurance Tagged bank required life insurance, business life insurance, CEO, court ordered life insurance, divorce settlement, DUI, high limit life insurance, insurance, key man life insurance, life insurance, life insurance underwriters, Lloyds of London, needing life insurance now, traditional life insurance

Although certain state eligibility requirements must first be met, uncontested divorces typically can be finalized faster that traditional divorces, as the parties do not need to litigate their issues in court.

Collaborative Divorce can be more cost - effective than traditional divorces, as there are no expensive and time - consuming motions and papers to file before the court.

Rather than a traditional divorce that may be resolved by a judge in a courtroom, you can stay in control of your family's future by settling out of court.

- In a traditional divorce, the court process often causes hostility and conflict within a family and places the...

In a traditional court - based divorce, each party hires his or her own forensic account to value the company.

Since the matter is being negotiated outside the court system, the privacy of the husband and wife are upheld, as it is not subject to the same public record as a traditional divorce litigation.

In a traditional divorce case, this would have taken months of pleadings, court hearings, potentially mediation and thousands of dollars to accomplish what we accomplished in two hours.

Moguly Media's recently published bestselling book aims to educate divorcing couples on Collaborative Divorce — the contemporary alternative to traditional family court dDivorce — the contemporary alternative to traditional family court divorcedivorce.

This is in stark contrast to traditional divorce, where the adversarial court system pits husband versus wife, mother versus father, ultimately to be judged by a stranger appointed or elected to a government position.

Traditional, contested divorce proceedings may involve several heated trips to court, often requiring substantial legal fees and the intimidation of having to testify before a judge.

As my law practice does not offer mediation services, but only «traditional» divorce, I am more likely to encounter people who have the more difficult problems that require some litigation of various issues in court.

Collaborative Divorce is different from a traditional court battle.

Most people, including even «traditional» divorce litigators like me, are fond of saying it is best to resolve differences and settle divorces «out of court.»

The typical traditional divorce case in Oregon goes to final trial eight to twelve months after it is filed with the court.

There's just no room for that in the traditional divorce proceeding, she adds, explaining courts are not equipped to deal with emotions or to offer custom solutions for a couple facing divorce.

Perhaps you are ready for a divorce but are unsure of whether to approach the matter using the traditional court - based solution or whether you should turn to the new growing phenomenon of Collaborative Ddivorce but are unsure of whether to approach the matter using the traditional court - based solution or whether you should turn to the new growing phenomenon of Collaborative DivorceDivorce.

In a traditional divorce, Psychologists are used as expert witnesses to perform Custody Evaluations and then provide a written report or testify in court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the children.

The Collaborative Law Rule of Professional Conduct holds collaborative attorneys to a higher standard than traditional divorce lawyers, while the Collaborative Family Law Rule of Procedure, among other things, specifies when collaborative cases begin and end and defines the interaction between the courts and the collaborative process.

Although the couple remains married following an order of judicial separation, the court does issue the same types of orders found in a more traditional divorce case.

Many couples who have come to parting think that because the well of their marriage is so polluted by anger, strife and bitterness — in short, that because conflict has poisoned the marriage at its roots — a collaborative divorce can not work and traditional court battle is their only way out.

In most cases, divorcing spouses resolve the issues in dispute through mediation, the collaborative divorce process, through the traditional litigation model before trial, negotiation between attorneys, and sometimes with the assistance of the court.

In addition, since the courts are not involved, then the number and volume of disclosures required are typically less than would be needed in a traditional divorce, where boxes and boxes of documents can be produced.

If you can't do that, you probably need lawyers and the traditional court divorce process.

I was representing a wife in a traditional court divorce case.

«How To Divorce Without Court While A Team of Professionals Works To Help You Preserve Your Interest, Save Money, and Protect Your Children» FREE Divorce Guide: Learn about a new approach to divorce that puts a team of experts to work for you for less than the cost of a traditional adversarial dDivorce Without Court While A Team of Professionals Works To Help You Preserve Your Interest, Save Money, and Protect Your Children» FREE Divorce Guide: Learn about a new approach to divorce that puts a team of experts to work for you for less than the cost of a traditional adversarial dDivorce Guide: Learn about a new approach to divorce that puts a team of experts to work for you for less than the cost of a traditional adversarial ddivorce that puts a team of experts to work for you for less than the cost of a traditional adversarial divorcedivorce.

Mediation is an alternative to traditional divorce litigation that allows couples to come to an amicable resolution without going to court.

In a traditional (non-mediated) divorce, lawyers give legal advice, draft court papers, and negotiate or litigate the terms of the divorce.

And while not every traditional divorce ends in an all out war, there is always the threat of court when negotiations break down.

If you are facing a separation or a divorce and don't want to go through the traditional court process, call 705-928-3218 or visit www.kawarthacollaborative.com.

Many divorcing couples, unwed parents of children and others involved in family disputes often find the no - court process known as Collaborative Law a welcome alternative to the often destructive and damaging aspects of resolving disputes or marital breakups through the traditional model of contested litigation.